Add updated checksums

[blimlim]

1. Summary:

What has changed?
The reproducibility checksums have been updated to match the current configuration. The checksums were generated my manually running the model-config-tests

Why was this done?
The checksums are out of date with the configuration, meaning that the reproducibility tests won't work properly.

2. Issues Addressed:

• Update dev-amip testing checksums #345

3. Dependencies (e.g. on payu, or model)

This change requires changes to (note pull request(s) where relevant):

• workflow manager (payu):
• model deployment (ACCESS-ESM1.6):
• model component or library dependency:
• input workflow:

4. Ad-hoc Testing

What ad-hoc testing was done? How are you convinced this change is correct (plots are good)?
No changes to actual model configuration

5. CI Testing

• !test repro has been run

6. Reproducibility

Is this reproducible with the previous commit? (If not, why not?)

• Yes
• No - !test repro commit has been run.

7. Performance

Has the model performance (say, throughput of model-years/wall-day) changed?

• Yes
• No
• N/A (if selected, please add a brief explanation why performance testing is not necessary for this PR)

No changes to configuration

If yes, provide the numbers from your testing. Is the performance better or worse?

8. Manifests

Have you changed the executable, the input files and/or the restart files?

• Yes
• No

If yes, have you updated the manifests?

• Yes
• No

To update the manifests, run payu setup (in a cloned copy of your feature branch) with reproducibility tests turned off:

manifest:
  reproduce:
    exe: false
    input: false
    restart: false
runlog:
  enable: false

Then commit the newly created manifest files (under manifests/) only to the branch for this PR.

9. Documentation

Is the documentation updated?

• Yes
• N/A

10. Merge Strategy

• Merge commit
• Rebase and merge
• Squash

[blimlim]

!test repro

[github-actions]

❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌

When comparing:

• 345-amip-checksums (checksums created using commit 11fdbc4), against
• dev-amip (checksums in commit d9516c2)

Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-esm1.6-configs/11fdbc4f0955598823d21bba8fc3938eccd1e97b, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/runs/59425606947.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/actions/runs/20701889623/artifacts/5019842316.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/tree/d9516c2f3b050ed1e0b5d6dd98735abef30f3c16/testing/checksum

Test summary:
❌ test_repro_historical
✅ test_repro_determinism

[blimlim]

!test repro commit

[github-actions]

❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌

When comparing:

• 345-amip-checksums (checksums created using commit 11fdbc4), against
• dev-amip (checksums in commit d9516c2)

🔧 The new checksums will be committed to this PR, if they differ from what is on this branch.

Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-esm1.6-configs/11fdbc4f0955598823d21bba8fc3938eccd1e97b, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/runs/59425802228.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/actions/runs/20701965497/artifacts/5019860350.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/tree/d9516c2f3b050ed1e0b5d6dd98735abef30f3c16/testing/checksum

Test summary:
❌ test_repro_historical
✅ test_repro_determinism