Conversation
It makes more sense, and is not completely impossible to find on OSX anymore.
find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i 's/vcs.prefix+"\/sample_data\//vcs.sample_data+"\//' find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i 's/os.path.join(vcs.prefix,"sample_data",/os.path.join(vcs.sample_data,/' find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i 's/os.path.join( vcs.prefix, "sample_data",/os.path.join( vcs.sample_data,/' find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i "s/os.path.join(vcs.prefix,'sample_data',/os.path.join(vcs.sample_data,/" find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i "s/os.path.join(vcs.prefix, 'sample_data\//os.path.join(vcs.sample_data, '/" find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i 's/os.path.join(vcs.prefix, "sample_data\//os.path.join(vcs.sample_data, "/' find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i "s/cdat_info.get_prefix()+'\/sample_data\//cdat_info.get_sampledata_path()+'\//" find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i 's/cdat_info.get_prefix()+"\/sample_data\//cdat_info.get_sampledata_path()+"\//' find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i "s/cdat_info.get_prefix() + '\/sample_data\//cdat_info.get_sampledata_path() + '\//" find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i "s/os.path.join (cdat_info.get_prefix(),'sample_data\/' +/os.path.join (cdat_info.get_sampledata_path(),/" find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i "s/cdms.__path__\[0\],'..','..','..','..','sample_data',/vcs.sample_data,/" find Packages testing -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i "s/cdms2.__path__\[0\],'..','..','..','..','sample_data',/vcs.sample_data,/"
…e-data-location-updated
|
@aashish24 I would not stick the path into vcs.sample_data |
|
I see you actually have such function in cdat_info. Perfect! Can you please use it accross the whole repo? So it is consistent. |
|
@doutriaux1 The path is Changing |
|
also the changes in vcs_legacy are going to create a merge conflcit with PR #1369 which removes this directory all together. |
|
@remram44 I guess it's ok, I don't really mind it, just thinking about a new user trying to create a new test and copying from these, they would never know about the "proper" way. I can live with it though. Should I merge then (after I ran ctest on this of course). |
|
@doutriaux1 that is a good point. I think it would be better down the road to have something other than vcs managing the data path but for now I think vcs is Okay. One think I should mention that importing vcs (before build) is not ideal since it seems that it needs vtk and other modules imported as well which won't be found until build. |
fixed other tests to NOT use vcs to detect path of sample_data
Sample data location updated
3 participants
Updated branch for #1363.