Skip to content

Commit 14d1a1f

Browse files
jeremymanninggithub-actions[bot]
authored andcommitted
Auto-solve daily LeetCode problem using GPT-5-mini
1 parent a00dea3 commit 14d1a1f

File tree

1 file changed

+57
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+57
-0
lines changed

problems/85/gpt5-mini.md

Lines changed: 57 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
1+
# [Problem 85: Maximal Rectangle](https://leetcode.com/problems/maximal-rectangle/description/?envType=daily-question)
2+
3+
## Initial thoughts (stream-of-consciousness)
4+
I need the largest-area rectangle containing only '1's in a binary matrix. A brute-force approach would enumerate all possible rectangles and check if they're all '1's, but that's O((mn)^2) rectangles times O(mn) check — far too slow for m,n up to 200.
5+
6+
I recall a common trick: treat each row as the base of a histogram where the height at each column is the number of consecutive '1's up to that row. Then the problem reduces, for each row, to "largest rectangle in histogram" which can be solved in O(n) using a monotonic stack. So overall O(m * n) time. That seems promising.
7+
8+
I'll update heights row-by-row and compute largest-rectangle-in-histogram each time. Need to handle edge cases: empty matrix; rows or columns equal to 1; all zeros.
9+
10+
## Refining the problem, round 2 thoughts
11+
- For each row i, compute heights[j] = heights[j] + 1 if matrix[i][j] == '1' else 0.
12+
- Compute largest rectangle area from heights with the standard mono-decreasing stack using a sentinel (append a 0).
13+
- Complexity: for m rows and n columns, updating heights is O(n) per row, histogram algorithm is O(n) per row, total O(m*n). Space is O(n) for heights and stack.
14+
- Edge cases: if matrix is empty, return 0. If a row has all zeros, heights will reset to zero and histogram will yield 0 correctly.
15+
- Implementation detail: do not mutate heights length permanently; use a temporary heights_with_sentinel = heights + [0] when scanning with stack.
16+
17+
## Attempted solution(s)
18+
```python
19+
from typing import List
20+
21+
class Solution:
22+
def maximalRectangle(self, matrix: List[List[str]]) -> int:
23+
if not matrix or not matrix[0]:
24+
return 0
25+
26+
rows, cols = len(matrix), len(matrix[0])
27+
heights = [0] * cols
28+
max_area = 0
29+
30+
for r in range(rows):
31+
# update histogram heights for this row
32+
for c in range(cols):
33+
if matrix[r][c] == '1':
34+
heights[c] += 1
35+
else:
36+
heights[c] = 0
37+
38+
# compute largest rectangle in histogram heights
39+
# use a monotonic increasing stack of indices
40+
stack = []
41+
extended = heights + [0] # sentinel to flush stack at the end
42+
for i, h in enumerate(extended):
43+
while stack and extended[stack[-1]] > h:
44+
height = extended[stack.pop()]
45+
width = i if not stack else i - stack[-1] - 1
46+
area = height * width
47+
if area > max_area:
48+
max_area = area
49+
stack.append(i)
50+
51+
return max_area
52+
```
53+
- Notes:
54+
- Approach: treat each row as the base of a histogram of consecutive '1's above that row; for each histogram compute largest rectangle using a monotonic stack.
55+
- Time complexity: O(rows * cols) — each cell is processed a constant number of times.
56+
- Space complexity: O(cols) for the heights array and stack.
57+
- Implementation details: append a 0 sentinel to flush out remaining heights; widths are computed from popped index and current index with stack top as previous smaller index. Handles empty matrix and all-zero rows correctly.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)