|
| 1 | +# [Problem 3653: XOR After Range Multiplication Queries I](https://leetcode.com/problems/xor-after-range-multiplication-queries-i/description/?envType=daily-question) |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Initial thoughts (stream-of-consciousness) |
| 4 | +The problem describes applying q queries; each query multiplies elements in nums over an arithmetic progression of indices: starting at l, then l+k, l+2k, ... up to r, with multiplication by v modulo MOD = 1e9+7. After all queries we must return the XOR of all elements. |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +Given constraints n, q ≤ 1000, a straightforward simulation of each query by iterating the affected indices is feasible (worst-case about n * q = 1e6 element updates), which is fast in Python. The multiplication is modular, but XOR is done on the final modular values. Possible alternative approaches like grouping by residue classes or precomputing multiplicative effects per index are unnecessary given small bounds. |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +I should be careful with index stepping and using modulo at every multiplication (to avoid overflow). Also confirm indices are 0-based (examples show 0-based). |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +## Refining the problem, round 2 thoughts |
| 11 | +- Edge cases: k can be up to n, meaning a single index per query; l may equal r. v can be large but we always reduce modulo MOD. |
| 12 | +- Complexity: simulation yields O(sum over queries of number of affected indices) ≤ O(n * q) = 1e6 operations — perfectly acceptable. |
| 13 | +- Memory: we modify nums in-place so O(1) extra besides input. |
| 14 | +- Implementation detail: use Python's range(l, r+1, k) to iterate indices efficiently. |
| 15 | +- After processing all queries, compute XOR by iterating nums once O(n). |
| 16 | +- No tricky numeric interaction between XOR and modulo beyond doing modulo on each update. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +## Attempted solution(s) |
| 19 | +```python |
| 20 | +from typing import List |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +class Solution: |
| 23 | + def xorAfterQueries(self, nums: List[int], queries: List[List[int]]) -> int: |
| 24 | + MOD = 10**9 + 7 |
| 25 | + n = len(nums) |
| 26 | + for l, r, k, v in queries: |
| 27 | + # iterate indices l, l+k, l+2k, ... <= r |
| 28 | + # Python's range handles step and end-exclusive, so use r+1 |
| 29 | + for idx in range(l, r + 1, k): |
| 30 | + nums[idx] = (nums[idx] * v) % MOD |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + # compute XOR of all elements |
| 33 | + res = 0 |
| 34 | + for x in nums: |
| 35 | + res ^= x |
| 36 | + return res |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +# Example usage: |
| 39 | +if __name__ == "__main__": |
| 40 | + sol = Solution() |
| 41 | + print(sol.xorAfterQueries([1,1,1], [[0,2,1,4]])) # expected 4 |
| 42 | + print(sol.xorAfterQueries([2,3,1,5,4], [[1,4,2,3],[0,2,1,2]])) # expected 31 |
| 43 | +``` |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +- Notes: |
| 46 | + - Approach: Direct simulation of each query by stepping through affected indices with range(l, r+1, k) and applying modular multiplication. |
| 47 | + - Time complexity: O(n * q) in the worst case (≤ 1e6 updates given constraints). |
| 48 | + - Space complexity: O(1) extra space (modifies nums in-place; output uses constant extra memory). |
| 49 | + - Implementation details: Use modulo 10^9+7 on each multiplication to keep values within bounds; XOR is performed on the modular values as required. |
0 commit comments