Version: 1.0
Last Updated: 2026-01-14
Status: Active
This document defines CreditNexus's vulnerability management process, including identification, assessment, remediation, and disclosure procedures.
-
Automated Security Scans:
- CI/CD security scanning (Bandit, Semgrep, pip-audit)
- Dependency vulnerability scanning (Dependabot, Safety)
- Secrets detection (detect-secrets)
- Weekly scheduled scans
-
Code Reviews:
- Pull request reviews
- Security-focused code reviews
- Architecture reviews
-
Penetration Testing:
- Annual penetration tests
- Red team exercises
- Bug bounty programs (if applicable)
-
Security Researchers:
- Responsible disclosure via security@creditnexus.com
- Bug bounty programs
- Security advisories
-
Vendor Advisories:
- Dependency vulnerability databases (CVE, GitHub Advisories)
- Vendor security bulletins
- Third-party security notifications
-
User Reports:
- Security concerns from users
- Suspicious activity reports
- Definition: Remote code execution, authentication bypass, or data breach
- Examples:
- SQL injection
- Remote code execution
- Authentication bypass
- Privilege escalation
- Sensitive data exposure
- Definition: Significant security impact, but requires specific conditions
- Examples:
- Cross-site scripting (XSS)
- CSRF with state-changing operations
- Insecure deserialization
- Insecure direct object references
- Definition: Moderate security impact
- Examples:
- Information disclosure
- Denial of service
- Weak cryptography
- Security misconfigurations
- Definition: Minimal security impact
- Examples:
- Informational disclosures
- Best practice violations
- Low-risk misconfigurations
-
Detection:
- Automated scan identifies vulnerability
- Security researcher reports vulnerability
- Internal review discovers issue
-
Initial Triage:
- Acknowledge receipt (within 24 hours)
- Assign unique vulnerability ID
- Classify severity
- Assign to security team
-
Technical Assessment:
- Verify vulnerability exists
- Assess exploitability
- Determine impact
- Identify affected systems/versions
-
Business Impact:
- Assess data at risk
- Estimate number of affected users
- Evaluate business impact
- Determine regulatory implications
-
Risk Rating:
- Calculate CVSS score (if applicable)
- Assign final severity
- Prioritize remediation
-
Fix Development:
- Develop security patch
- Code review
- Security review
- Testing
-
Deployment:
- Deploy to staging
- Verify fix effectiveness
- Deploy to production
- Monitor for issues
-
Verification:
- Verify vulnerability is fixed
- Test for regressions
- Confirm no new vulnerabilities introduced
-
Internal Disclosure:
- Notify security team
- Update vulnerability database
- Document remediation
-
External Disclosure:
- Security advisory (if public)
- Credit researcher (if applicable)
- Update changelog
- Public disclosure (if required)
- Acknowledgment: Within 24 hours
- Fix Development: Within 7 days
- Deployment: Within 14 days
- Target: 30 days maximum
- Acknowledgment: Within 48 hours
- Fix Development: Within 30 days
- Deployment: Within 60 days
- Target: 90 days maximum
- Acknowledgment: Within 1 week
- Fix Development: Within 90 days
- Deployment: Within 180 days
- Target: 6 months maximum
- Acknowledgment: Within 2 weeks
- Fix Development: As resources allow
- Deployment: Next release cycle
- Target: 12 months maximum
- Primary: GitHub Security Advisories
- Secondary: Internal vulnerability database
- Format: Structured vulnerability records
- Vulnerability ID: Unique identifier
- Title: Brief description
- Severity: Critical, High, Medium, Low
- CVSS Score: If applicable
- Discovery Date: When vulnerability was found
- Reported By: Who reported it
- Affected Systems: List of affected components
- Description: Detailed description
- Impact: Business and technical impact
- Remediation: Fix details
- Status: Open, In Progress, Fixed, Closed
- Timeline: Key dates and milestones
-
Reporting:
- Email: security@creditnexus.com
- Include: Description, steps to reproduce, impact assessment
- Do NOT: Exploit publicly, access user data, disrupt services
-
Our Commitment:
- Acknowledge within 24 hours
- Provide regular updates
- Credit in security advisories (if desired)
- Fair assessment and response
-
Recognition:
- Security Hall of Fame (if applicable)
- Credit in release notes
- Public acknowledgment (with permission)
-
Reporting:
- Create GitHub Security Advisory (private)
- Notify security team
- Document in vulnerability database
-
Process:
- Follow same lifecycle as external reports
- Internal tracking and remediation
- Public disclosure (if required)
-
Automated:
- Dependabot alerts
- pip-audit scans
- npm audit
- Safety checks
-
Manual:
- Review security advisories
- Monitor CVE database
- Vendor notifications
-
Critical/High:
- Update immediately
- Test thoroughly
- Deploy as hotfix (if needed)
-
Medium/Low:
- Update in next release
- Test in staging
- Deploy in regular release cycle
- Security Patches: Apply immediately
- Minor Updates: Include in next release
- Major Updates: Plan and test thoroughly
-
Static Analysis (SAST):
- Bandit (Python)
- Semgrep (Multi-language)
- Ruff security rules
- ESLint security plugin
-
Code Review:
- Security-focused reviews
- OWASP Top 10 checklist
- Secure coding guidelines
-
Dynamic Analysis (DAST):
- OWASP ZAP
- Penetration testing
- Runtime security testing
-
Fix Development:
- Follow secure coding practices
- Code review required
- Security review required
- Comprehensive testing
-
Deployment:
- Deploy to staging first
- Security verification
- Production deployment
- Post-deployment monitoring
-
Security Misconfigurations:
- Default credentials
- Unnecessary services enabled
- Weak encryption settings
- Improper access controls
-
Infrastructure:
- Unpatched systems
- Weak network security
- Insecure storage
- Missing security headers
-
Immediate:
- Fix critical misconfigurations
- Disable unnecessary services
- Update default settings
-
Ongoing:
- Regular configuration audits
- Security hardening
- Compliance checks
-
Vulnerability Metrics:
- Total vulnerabilities discovered
- By severity breakdown
- Mean time to fix (MTTF)
- Remediation rate
-
Process Metrics:
- Time to acknowledgment
- Time to fix
- Time to deployment
- False positive rate
- Monthly: Vulnerability summary report
- Quarterly: Trend analysis
- Annually: Comprehensive security assessment
- Monthly: Review vulnerability trends
- Quarterly: Assess process effectiveness
- Annually: Comprehensive process review
- Update scanning tools
- Enhance detection capabilities
- Improve remediation processes
- Streamline workflows
- SAST: Bandit, Semgrep
- SCA: pip-audit, Safety, npm audit
- Secrets: detect-secrets
- DAST: OWASP ZAP
- CVE: https://cve.mitre.org/
- GitHub Advisories: https://github.com/advisories
- Snyk: https://snyk.io/vuln/
- NVD: https://nvd.nist.gov/
- OWASP Top 10: https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/
- CWE: https://cwe.mitre.org/
- CVSS: https://www.first.org/cvss/
- Vulnerability Management: Required process
- Remediation Timelines: Documented and tracked
- Third-Party Risk: Assess vendor vulnerabilities
- Data Breach: Report vulnerabilities that could lead to breaches
- Security Measures: Document vulnerability management as security measure
- Email: security@creditnexus.com
- PGP Key: [If available]
- Response Time: Within 24 hours
- Security Team: [Email]
- DevOps Team: [Email]
- CTO: [Email]
Document Owner: Security Team
Review Date: Quarterly
Next Review: [Date]