fix: Correctly type getMissingResultsUrl query as string#1781
Merged
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docsearch canceled.
|
francoischalifour
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2023
francoischalifour
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! I think that's fine to release as a minor as it was not intended.
Member
|
oops thanks! indeed it was also provided in #1735 and not intended D: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
({ query: string }) => string;was being interpreted as a prop rename, which doesn't make sense in the context of an interface, so I've corrected it to what I assume was the intended outcome wherequeryis of typestring, rather than being inferred asany.NOTE: Technically this is a breaking change as
querywas being inferred with typeany, so consumers that were using it as such may need to change their code. On the other hand, I doubt many consumers are using this value as if it were anything but astring, so IMO a patch fix is also valid in this case. I'll leave this decision to the maintainers.