In this document you can learn basics of how you should use Git in Airflow project. It explains branching model and stresses that we are using rebase workflow. It also explains how to sync your fork with the main repository.
Airflow documentation, helper scripts (dev/sync_fork.sh), release tooling and
agent instructions (AGENTS.md) all assume the following two remote names, and
you should configure your local checkout to match:
upstream— the canonicalapache/airflowrepository (where you fetch from).origin— your personal fork ofapache/airflow(where you push branches for PRs).
Always push PR branches to origin; don't push to upstream (the branch
protection on apache/airflow will reject it anyway). Working on dedicated
branches is recommended, though developing directly on your fork's main is
tolerated — see Contribution Workflow.
If your existing checkout uses different names (for example apache for the
Apache remote, or origin pointing at apache/airflow with your fork under
another name), rename them to match the convention. Common migrations:
# Case 1: upstream is currently named "apache"
git remote rename apache upstream
# Case 2: "origin" points at apache/airflow and your fork is named "fork"
git remote rename origin upstream
git remote rename fork origin
# Case 3: upstream is missing entirely
git remote add upstream https://github.com/apache/airflow.git
# ... or via SSH:
git remote add upstream git@github.com:apache/airflow.gitThen confirm with git remote -v. Ad-hoc remote names still work for one-off
commands, but the helper scripts and documented workflows below all assume
upstream / origin.
All new development in Airflow happens in the main branch which is now Airflow 3. All PRs should target that branch.
We also have a v2-10-test branch that is used to test 2.10.x series of Airflow 2 and where maintainers
cherry-pick selected commits from the main branch.
For Contributors:
All bug fixes after 2.10.0 release will target Airflow 3. We will make the best effort to make them available in 2.10.x,
but if somebody wants to guarantee that a fix is included in 2.10.x, they need to raise the PR explicitly to the v2-10-test branch too.
For Committers:
When merging bugfix PRs to the main branch, the committers should also try to cherry-pick it to v2-10-test branch.
If there are merge conflicts, the committer should add a comment on the original PR, informing the author and asking them
to raise a separate PR against v2-10-test branch. If this doesn't happen, there is no guarantee that the PR will be part of 2.10.x
Cherry-picking is done with the -x flag. In the future, this can happen automatically with the help of a bot and appropriate
label on a PR.
Once the v2-10-test branch stabilizes, the v2-10-stable branch is synchronized with v2-10-test.
The v2-10-stable branches are used to release 2.10.x releases.
The general approach is that cherry-picking a commit that has already had a PR and unit tests run
against main is done to v2-10-test branch, and PRs from contributors towards 2.0 should target
v2-10-test branch.
The v2-10-test branch and v2-10-stable ones are merged just before the release and that's the
time when they converge.
The production images are released in DockerHub from:
- main branch for development
3.*.*,3.*.*rc*releases from thev3-*-stablebranch when we prepare release candidates and final releases.2.*.*,2.*.*rc*releases from thev2-*-stablebranch when we prepare release candidates and final releases.
The Airflow Helm Chart follows a different branch model from Airflow core, because the chart's major version cadence is independent of Airflow's:
main— development branch for the next Airflow Helm Chart 2.x major release. This is where deprecations are removed, restructurings land, and a number of optional features are being extracted from the core chart into separate kustomizable overlays (users will compose them on top of the rendered chart withkustomizeinstead of toggling them via ever-growingvalues.yamlkeys). PRs with new features, refactorings, or breaking changes for the chart should targetmain.chart/v1-2x-test— maintenance branch for the 1.2x.x release line. This branch is strictly for bug-fixes, doc-fixes, and deprecation warnings that give 1.2x.x users notice before features are removed in 2.x. No new features, no restructurings, and no overlay extractions land here.1.2x.xchart releases are cut from this branch.
The full workflow — which PRs target which branch, which commits are cherry-picked across, milestones, and the umbrella refurbish project — is documented in dev/README_HELM_CHART2_DEV.md. Read it before opening a chart PR. The current 2.0 scope and chart release schedule live on the Release Plan wiki page, which is the source of truth as the plan evolves.
When you have your fork, you should periodically synchronize the main of your fork with the
Apache Airflow main. In order to do that you can git pull --rebase to your local git repository from
the upstream remote and push the main (often with --force to your fork). There is also an easy
way to sync your fork in GitHub's web UI with the Fetch upstream feature.
This will force-push the main branch from apache/airflow to the main branch
in your fork. Note that in case you modified the main in your fork, you might loose those changes.
If you also backport to the current release branch (for example v3-2-test) you usually
want to keep more than one branch of your fork in sync with upstream. The
dev/sync_fork.sh helper does that in one go — it fetches upstream and force-pushes
each listed branch from upstream/<branch> directly to origin/<branch> without
touching your local working tree or checked-out branch.
Warning
The script uses git push --force and will overwrite the listed branches
on your fork. By default it targets main and the current release branch
(currently v3-2-test). Any commits you have on those branches in your fork
that are not in upstream will be lost. If you keep work on those branches,
commit it to a different branch first.
Assumes your remotes are named upstream (for apache/airflow) and origin
(for your fork). Override with the UPSTREAM_REMOTE and ORIGIN_REMOTE
environment variables if yours are named differently.
# Sync the default branches (main and the current release branch)
./dev/sync_fork.sh
# Sync only main
./dev/sync_fork.sh main
# Sync a specific set of branches
./dev/sync_fork.sh main v3-2-test v3-1-testA lot of people are unfamiliar with the rebase workflow in Git, but we think it is an excellent workflow, providing a better alternative to the merge workflow. We've therefore written a short guide for those who would like to learn it.
Rebasing is a good practice recommended to follow for all code changes.
As of February 2022, GitHub introduced the capability of "Update with Rebase" which make it easy to perform
rebase straight in the GitHub UI, so in cases when there are no conflicts, rebasing to latest version
of main can be done very easily following the instructions
in the GitHub blog
However, when you have conflicts, sometimes you will have to perform rebase manually, and resolve the conflicts, and remainder of the section describes how to approach it.
As opposed to the merge workflow, the rebase workflow allows us to clearly separate your changes from the changes of others. It puts the responsibility of rebasing on the author of the change. It also produces a "single-line" series of commits on the main branch. This makes it easier to understand what was going on and to find reasons for problems (it is especially useful for "bisecting" when looking for a commit that introduced some bugs).
First of all, we suggest you read about the rebase workflow here: Merging vs. rebasing. This is an excellent article that describes all the ins/outs of the rebase workflow. I recommend keeping it for future reference.
The goal of rebasing your PR on top of upstream/main is to "transplant" your change on top of
the latest changes that are merged by others. It also allows you to fix all the conflicts
that arise as a result of other people changing the same files as you and merging the changes to upstream/main.
Here is how rebase looks in practice (you can find a summary below these detailed steps):
You first need to add the Apache project remote to your git repository. This is only necessary once, so if it's not the first time you are following this tutorial you can skip this step. Per the Git remote naming conventions we add it as
upstream:- If you use ssh:
git remote add upstream git@github.com:apache/airflow.git - If you use https:
git remote add upstream https://github.com/apache/airflow.git
- If you use ssh:
You then need to make sure that you have the latest main fetched from the
upstreamrepository. You can do this viagit fetch upstream(to fetch upstream remote)git fetch --all(to fetch all remotes)Assuming that your feature is in a branch in your repository called
my-branchyou can easily check what is the base commit you should rebase from viagit merge-base my-branch upstream/mainThis will print the HASH of the base commit which you should use to rebase your feature from. For example:
5abce471e0690c6b8d06ca25685b0845c5fd270f. Copy that HASH and go to the next step.Optionally, if you want better control you can also find this commit hash manually.
Run:
git logAnd find the first commit that you DO NOT want to "transplant".
Performing:
git rebase HASHWill "transplant" all commits after the commit with the HASH.
Providing that you weren't already working on your branch, check out your feature branch locally via
git checkout my-branchCommit your code change
git add .git commitIf you encounter error "Please tell me who you are .git", run the below commands to set up.
git config user.name "someone"git config user.email "someone@someplace.com"You can add the
--globalflag to avoid setting it for every cloned repo.Rebase
git rebase HASH --onto upstream/mainFor example:
git rebase 5abce471e0690c6b8d06ca25685b0845c5fd270f --onto upstream/mainRebasing is a good practice recommended to follow for all code changes.
If you have no conflicts - that's cool. You rebased. You can now run
git push --force-with-leaseto push your changes to your repository. That should trigger the build in our CI if you have a Pull Request (PR) opened alreadyWhen you have conflicts with
uv.lockwhen rebasing, simply delete theuv.lockfile and runuv lockto regenerate it. This is the recommended way to solve conflicts inuv.lockfile.While rebasing you might have conflicts. Read carefully what git tells you when it prints information about the conflicts. You need to solve the conflicts manually. This is sometimes the most difficult part and requires deliberately correcting your code and looking at what has changed since you developed your changes
There are various tools that can help you with this. You can use:
git mergetoolYou can configure different merge tools with it. You can also use IntelliJ/PyCharm's excellent merge tool. When you open a project in PyCharm which has conflicts, you can go to VCS > Git > Resolve Conflicts and there you have a very intuitive and helpful merge tool. For more information, see Resolve conflicts.
After you've solved your conflict run
git rebase --continueAnd go to either point 6 or 7, depending on whether you have more commits that cause conflicts in your PR (rebasing applies each commit from your PR one-by-one).
Useful when you understand the flow but don't remember the steps and want a quick reference.
git fetch --all
git add .
git commit
git merge-base my-branch upstream/main
git checkout my-branch
git rebase HASH --onto upstream/main
git push --force-with-leaseNow, once you know it all you can read more about how Airflow repository is a monorepo containing both Airflow package and more than 80 providers and how to develop providers.
