Commit 6089e2e
committed
Remove unused loops in deferred checks
Summary
--
While reviewing #23473, I noticed that the `while` loops in our deferred checks
for `for` loops and lambdas would only be used if we pushed additional deferred
scopes to the `Checker` while running lint rule code. This should actually be
impossible given that the rules only receive a `&Checker` (as shown by the
immutable re-borrow), and none of our tests fail when removing the loops.
I guess it doesn't hurt to have the loops either since they only run once, but
it did serve to confuse me today.
I assume, but didn't fully confirm, that this used to be interleaved with the
visiting phase, at which point additional deferred scopes could have still been
added in the middle of this.
Test Plan
--
Existing tests1 parent cb2035a commit 6089e2e
2 files changed
Lines changed: 50 additions & 50 deletions
Lines changed: 34 additions & 34 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
6 | 6 | | |
7 | 7 | | |
8 | 8 | | |
9 | | - | |
10 | | - | |
11 | | - | |
12 | | - | |
| 9 | + | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | + | |
13 | 12 | | |
14 | | - | |
15 | | - | |
16 | | - | |
17 | | - | |
18 | | - | |
19 | | - | |
20 | | - | |
21 | | - | |
22 | | - | |
23 | | - | |
24 | | - | |
25 | | - | |
26 | | - | |
27 | | - | |
28 | | - | |
29 | | - | |
30 | | - | |
31 | | - | |
32 | | - | |
33 | | - | |
34 | | - | |
35 | | - | |
36 | | - | |
37 | | - | |
38 | | - | |
39 | | - | |
40 | | - | |
41 | | - | |
42 | | - | |
43 | | - | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | + | |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | + | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | + | |
| 29 | + | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | + | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | + | |
| 34 | + | |
| 35 | + | |
| 36 | + | |
| 37 | + | |
| 38 | + | |
| 39 | + | |
| 40 | + | |
| 41 | + | |
| 42 | + | |
| 43 | + | |
44 | 44 | | |
45 | 45 | | |
46 | 46 | | |
Lines changed: 16 additions & 16 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
6 | 6 | | |
7 | 7 | | |
8 | 8 | | |
9 | | - | |
10 | | - | |
11 | | - | |
12 | | - | |
| 9 | + | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | + | |
13 | 12 | | |
14 | | - | |
15 | | - | |
16 | | - | |
| 13 | + | |
17 | 14 | | |
18 | | - | |
19 | | - | |
20 | | - | |
21 | | - | |
22 | | - | |
23 | | - | |
24 | | - | |
25 | | - | |
26 | | - | |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | + | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
27 | 27 | | |
28 | 28 | | |
29 | 29 | | |
0 commit comments