Skip to content

Use correct 64bit full multiplication for MinGW on ARM64#1057

Merged
grisumbras merged 1 commit intoboostorg:developfrom
vejbomar:fast-float-update
Oct 22, 2024
Merged

Use correct 64bit full multiplication for MinGW on ARM64#1057
grisumbras merged 1 commit intoboostorg:developfrom
vejbomar:fast-float-update

Conversation

@vejbomar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Update fast_float code from charconv to use correct 64bit full multiplication for MinGW on ARM64.

PR that did the same in charconv: boostorg/charconv#230

@cppalliance-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

An automated preview of the documentation is available at https://1057.jsondocs.prtest.cppalliance.org/libs/json/doc/html/index.html

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.41%. Comparing base (5bdbb23) to head (b6c916f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1057   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    93.41%   93.41%           
========================================
  Files           91       91           
  Lines         8667     8667           
========================================
  Hits          8096     8096           
  Misses         571      571           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...detail/charconv/detail/fast_float/float_common.hpp 62.19% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5bdbb23...b6c916f. Read the comment docs.

@cppalliance-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@grisumbras grisumbras merged commit b6c916f into boostorg:develop Oct 22, 2024
@grisumbras
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thank you for your contribution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants