Which of the Cross-Industry KITs shall be Automotive Specific?

[matbmoser]

Hi Tractus-X Community,

Maybe that is a good topic for our first office hour in Thursday.

Currently our Automotive Specific KITs are set to 0 (because all of them are at the cross industry kits):

https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/Kits/industry?id=automotive

And Catena-X continues with their KITs: https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/Kits/dataspace?name=Catena-X

Now is only the question we have 13 KITs that can be used from my perspective by any other Industries (Cross-Industries):

Which from this ones shall be automotive from the ones listed here https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/Kits/cross-industry ?

PR

#1387

[mhellmeier]

In my opinion, all KITs are too closely linked to the automotive industry, and to be honest, no KIT is cross-industry ready.

To give an example:
Currently, the Connector KIT is listed as a Dataspace Foundation KIT for cross-Industry usage.

When closer reviewing the KIT itself, it is highly framed to the automotive industry. The vision statement mentions:

Sharing data along the automotive supply chain

or

companies along the automotive value chain

Also, the Use Case part mentions

Value creation along the automotive value chain

Furthermore, there are specific pages, such as "Policies in Catena-X", that are entirely focused on Catena-X and the automotive industry, rather than being cross-industry.
Also, the KIT is linked to specific Catena-X standards, like CX-0018, which are also automotive standards and not cross-industry standards.