fix: skip descriptor validation for nestable at-rules#362
Merged
nzakas merged 2 commits intoJan 15, 2026
Conversation
1 task
Tanujkanti4441
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2026
Tanujkanti4441
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks!
Would like another member to review.
Merged
1 task
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request?
The
no-invalid-at-rulesrule was incorrectly treating properties inside nestable at-rules (like@media,@supports,@layer, etc.) as descriptors.What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Added a check to skip descriptor validation entirely when a declaration appears inside a nestable at-rule, since these at-rules don't have descriptors and should allow properties directly.
Related Issues
Closes #255
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?