VMESS+Trojan PacketTunnel exceeds 15M limit

[gaoxiaowei]

I used the Trojan protocol + Speedtest APP to measure the speed, which exceeded the 15M limit after running for a period of time. This is an inevitable problem. Is there an optimization method for this problem? Thank you!

[gaoxiaowei]

H2+VMESS also have the same problem

[tc2024]

Which version supports vmess protocol？The current version（v0.3.1） does not support vmess protocol

[eycorsican]

Logs? Full config?

[eycorsican]

You may try the dev branch and building with the default-openssl feature, openssl may not as efficient as ring/rustls, but you got more tunable options.

[gaoxiaowei]

I have tested with the dev branch and there is no OOM issue with Trojan. H2 is not only slow, but also has OOM problem. The relevant logs are as follows

dev_h2_crash.log

Currently, using OpenSSL has a smaller memory footprint than RustTLS

By the way, using the master branch WS_TLS also causes OOM issues multiple times, which is relatively rare

thanks

[eycorsican]

tbh, I've never tried h2 in practice, I don't even know whether there are tunable parameters in h2.

[ghost]

You may try the dev branch and building with the default-openssl feature, openssl may not as efficient as ring/rustls, but you got more tunable options.

I tried as U say,openssl has better performance then rustls-tls,really!
maybe tls_performance_rustls_versus_openssl is not right ?Or just because U used 'local cert' ?

rustls is 15% quicker to send data.
rustls is 5% quicker to receive data.
rustls is 20-40% quicker to set up a client connection.
rustls is 10% quicker to set up a server connection.
rustls is 30-70% quicker to resume a client connection.
rustls is 10-20% quicker to resume a server connection.
rustls uses less than half the memory of OpenSSL.

[ghost]

You may try the dev branch and building with the default-openssl feature, openssl may not as efficient as ring/rustls, but you got more tunable options.

I tried as U say,openssl has better performance then rustls-tls,really!

maybe tls_performance_rustls_versus_openssl is not right ?Or just because U used 'local cert' ?

rustls is 15% quicker to send data.

rustls is 5% quicker to receive data.

rustls is 20-40% quicker to set up a client connection.

rustls is 10% quicker to set up a server connection.

rustls is 30-70% quicker to resume a client connection.

rustls is 10-20% quicker to resume a server connection.

rustls uses less than half the memory of OpenSSL.

老哥。最近我发现访问一些网站内存释放不是很及时。你说会不会和内存释放不及时有关