[jest-get-type] Simplify checking for primitive

[Connormiha]

Summary

I just simplified checking for primitive type and improve performance.

Test plan

There were already tests, but I added some more

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #8416 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8416      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.32%   62.32%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         266      266              
  Lines       10734    10733       -1     
  Branches     2615     2614       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         6690     6689       -1     
  Misses       3461     3461              
  Partials      583      583

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/jest-get-type/src/index.ts	89.65% <100%> (-0.35%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 13bf7c7...1ec9cbc. Read the comment docs.

[scotthovestadt]

Benchmarks on perf?

[Connormiha]

https://jsperf.com/jest-get-type-is-primitive

[jeysal]

That's actually a quite beautiful way of doing it 👌

[scotthovestadt]

Elegant solution.

Change log please.

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.