Contributing to Ralph for Claude Code

Thank you for your interest in contributing to Ralph! This guide will help you get started and ensure your contributions follow our established patterns and quality standards.

Every contribution matters - from fixing typos to implementing major features. We appreciate your help in making Ralph better!

Getting Started
Development Workflow
Code Style Guidelines
Testing Requirements
Pull Request Process
Code Review Guidelines
Quality Standards
Community Guidelines

Getting Started

Prerequisites

Before contributing, ensure you have the following installed:

Bash 4.0+ - For script execution
jq - JSON processing (required)
git - Version control (required)
tmux - Terminal multiplexer (recommended)
Node.js 18+ - For running tests via npm

Clone the Repository

# Fork the repository on GitHub first, then clone your fork
git clone https://github.com/YOUR_USERNAME/ralph-claude-code.git
cd ralph-claude-code

Install Dependencies

# Install BATS testing framework and dependencies
npm install

# Verify BATS is available
./node_modules/.bin/bats --version

# Optional: Install Ralph globally for testing
./install.sh

Verify Your Setup

# Run the test suite to ensure everything works
npm test

# You should see output like:
# ✓ 276 tests passed (100% pass rate)

Project Structure

ralph-claude-code/
├── ralph_loop.sh        # Main loop script
├── ralph_monitor.sh     # Live monitoring dashboard
├── setup.sh             # Project initialization
├── ralph_import.sh      # PRD import tool
├── install.sh           # Global installation script
├── lib/                 # Modular library components
│   ├── circuit_breaker.sh
│   ├── response_analyzer.sh
│   └── date_utils.sh
├── templates/           # Project templates
├── tests/               # Test suite
│   ├── unit/            # Unit tests
│   ├── integration/     # Integration tests
│   ├── e2e/             # End-to-end tests
│   └── helpers/         # Test utilities
└── docs/                # Documentation

Development Workflow

Branch Naming Conventions

Always create a feature branch - never work directly on main:

Branch Type	Format	Example
New features	`feature/<feature-name>`	`feature/log-rotation`
Bug fixes	`fix/<issue-name>`	`fix/rate-limit-reset`
Documentation	`docs/<doc-update>`	`docs/api-reference`
Tests	`test/<test-area>`	`test/circuit-breaker`
Refactoring	`refactor/<area>`	`refactor/response-analyzer`

# Create a new feature branch
git checkout -b feature/my-awesome-feature

Commit Message Format

We use Conventional Commits for clear, structured commit history:

<type>(<scope>): <description>

[optional body]

[optional footer]

Types:

Type	Description	Example
`feat`	New feature	`feat(loop): add dry-run mode`
`fix`	Bug fix	`fix(monitor): correct refresh rate`
`docs`	Documentation only	`docs(readme): update installation steps`
`test`	Adding/updating tests	`test(setup): add template validation tests`
`refactor`	Code change (no features/fixes)	`refactor(analyzer): simplify error detection`
`chore`	Maintenance tasks	`chore(deps): update bats-assert`

Examples from Recent Commits:

# Feature addition
feat(import): add JSON output format support

# Bug fix with scope
fix(loop): replace non-existent --prompt-file with -p flag

# Documentation update
docs(status): update IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md with phased structure

# Test addition
test(cli): add 27 comprehensive CLI parsing tests

Writing Good Commit Messages:

Use imperative mood ("add" not "added")
Explain WHAT changed and WHY (not HOW)
Keep the subject line under 72 characters
Reference issues when applicable (fixes #123)

Workflow Diagram

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    Contribution Workflow                            │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

  ┌──────────┐     ┌──────────┐     ┌──────────┐     ┌──────────┐
  │  1. Fork │────>│ 2. Clone │────>│ 3. Branch│────>│ 4. Code  │
  └──────────┘     └──────────┘     └──────────┘     └──────────┘
                                                           │
                                                           v
  ┌──────────┐     ┌──────────┐     ┌──────────┐     ┌──────────┐
  │ 8. Merge │<────│  7. PR   │<────│ 6. Push  │<────│ 5. Test  │
  └──────────┘     │ Approved │     └──────────┘     │ (100%)   │
                   └──────────┘                      └──────────┘
                        ^
                        │
                   ┌──────────┐
                   │  CI/CD   │
                   │  Passes  │
                   └──────────┘

Code Style Guidelines

Bash Best Practices

Ralph follows consistent bash conventions across all scripts:

File Structure:

#!/bin/bash
# Script description
# Purpose and usage notes

# Source dependencies
source "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/lib/date_utils.sh"

# Configuration constants (UPPER_CASE)
MAX_CALLS_PER_HOUR=100
CB_NO_PROGRESS_THRESHOLD=3
STATUS_FILE="status.json"

# Colors for output
RED='\033[0;31m'
GREEN='\033[0;32m'
YELLOW='\033[1;33m'
NC='\033[0m'

# Helper functions (snake_case)
helper_function() {
    local param1=$1
    local param2=$2
    # Implementation
}

# Main logic
main() {
    # Entry point
}

# Export functions for reuse
export -f helper_function

# Execute main if run directly
if [[ "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" == "${0}" ]]; then
    main "$@"
fi

Naming Conventions:

Element	Convention	Example
Functions	snake_case	`get_circuit_state()`
Local variables	snake_case	`local loop_count=0`
Constants	UPPER_SNAKE_CASE	`MAX_CALLS_PER_HOUR`
File names	snake_case.sh	`circuit_breaker.sh`
Control files	snake_case.md	`fix_plan.md`, `AGENT.md`

Function Documentation:

# Get current circuit breaker state
# Returns the state as a string: CLOSED, HALF_OPEN, or OPEN
# Falls back to CLOSED if state file doesn't exist
get_circuit_state() {
    if [[ ! -f "$CB_STATE_FILE" ]]; then
        echo "$CB_STATE_CLOSED"
        return
    fi

    jq -r '.state' "$CB_STATE_FILE" 2>/dev/null || echo "$CB_STATE_CLOSED"
}

Error Handling:

# Always validate inputs
if [[ -z "$1" ]]; then
    echo -e "${RED}Error: Missing required argument${NC}" >&2
    exit 1
fi

# Use proper exit codes
# 0 = success, 1 = general error, 2 = invalid usage

Cross-Platform Compatibility:

# Use portable date commands
if command -v gdate &> /dev/null; then
    DATE_CMD="gdate"  # macOS with coreutils
else
    DATE_CMD="date"   # Linux
fi

JSON State Management:

# Always validate JSON before parsing
if ! jq '.' "$STATE_FILE" > /dev/null 2>&1; then
    echo "Error: Invalid JSON in state file"
    return 1
fi

# Use jq for safe parsing
local state=$(jq -r '.state' "$STATE_FILE" 2>/dev/null || echo "CLOSED")

Testing Requirements

Mandatory Testing Standards

All new features must include tests. This is non-negotiable.

Requirement	Standard	Enforcement
Test Pass Rate	100%	Mandatory - CI blocks merge
Test Coverage	85%	Aspirational - informational only

Note on Coverage: Bash code coverage with kcov cannot trace subprocess executions. Test pass rate is the enforced quality gate, not coverage percentage.

Test Organization

tests/
├── unit/                       # Fast, isolated tests
│   ├── test_cli_parsing.bats   # CLI argument tests
│   ├── test_json_parsing.bats  # JSON output parsing
│   ├── test_exit_detection.bats
│   ├── test_rate_limiting.bats
│   ├── test_session_continuity.bats
│   └── test_cli_modern.bats
├── integration/                # Multi-component tests
│   ├── test_loop_execution.bats
│   ├── test_edge_cases.bats
│   ├── test_installation.bats
│   ├── test_project_setup.bats
│   └── test_prd_import.bats
├── e2e/                        # End-to-end workflows
└── helpers/
    └── test_helper.bash        # Shared test utilities

Running Tests

Command	Purpose	When to Use
`npm test`	Run all tests	Before committing, before PR
`npm run test:unit`	Unit tests only	During development
`npm run test:integration`	Integration tests only	Testing interactions
`bats tests/unit/test_file.bats`	Single test file	Debugging specific tests

Writing Tests

Test Structure:

#!/usr/bin/env bats
# Unit Tests for Feature X

load '../helpers/test_helper'

# Setup runs before each test
setup() {
    source "$(dirname "$BATS_TEST_FILENAME")/../helpers/test_helper.bash"

    # Create isolated test environment
    export TEST_TEMP_DIR="$(mktemp -d /tmp/ralph-test.XXXXXX)"
    cd "$TEST_TEMP_DIR"

    # Initialize test state
    echo "0" > ".call_count"
}

# Teardown runs after each test
teardown() {
    cd /
    rm -rf "$TEST_TEMP_DIR"
}

# Test: Descriptive name explaining what's being tested
@test "can_make_call returns success when under limit" {
    echo "50" > ".call_count"
    export MAX_CALLS_PER_HOUR=100

    run can_make_call
    assert_success
}

# Test: Failure case
@test "can_make_call returns failure when at limit" {
    echo "100" > ".call_count"
    export MAX_CALLS_PER_HOUR=100

    run can_make_call
    assert_failure
}

Test Best Practices:

Test both success and failure cases
Use descriptive test names that explain the scenario
Isolate tests - each test should be independent
Mock external dependencies (Claude CLI, tmux, etc.)
Test edge cases (empty files, invalid input, boundary values)
Add comments for complex test scenarios

Available Test Helpers:

# From tests/helpers/test_helper.bash

assert_success      # Check command succeeded (exit 0)
assert_failure      # Check command failed (exit != 0)
assert_equal        # Compare two values
assert_output       # Check command output
assert_file_exists  # Verify file exists
assert_dir_exists   # Verify directory exists
strip_colors        # Remove ANSI color codes
create_mock_prompt  # Create test PROMPT.md
create_mock_fix_plan # Create test fix_plan.md
create_mock_status  # Create test status.json

Pull Request Process

Before Creating a PR

Run through this checklist:

All tests pass locally (npm test)
New code includes appropriate tests
Commits follow conventional format
Documentation updated if needed
No debug code or console.log statements
No secrets or credentials committed

Creating the PR

Push your branch:
```
git push origin feature/my-feature
```
Open a Pull Request on GitHub with:

PR Title: Follow conventional commit format

feat(loop): add dry-run mode for testing

PR Description Template:

## Summary

Brief description of what this PR does (1-3 bullet points).

- Adds dry-run mode to preview loop execution
- Includes new CLI flag `--dry-run`
- Logs actions without making actual changes

## Test Plan

- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Integration tests added/updated
- [ ] Manual testing completed

## Related Issues

Fixes #123
Related to #456

## Screenshots (if applicable)

[Add screenshots for UI/output changes]

## Breaking Changes

[List any breaking changes, or "None"]

After PR Creation

Wait for CI/CD - GitHub Actions will run all tests
Address review feedback - Make requested changes promptly
Keep PR updated - Rebase if main branch has changed

Code Review Guidelines

For Contributors

Responding to Feedback:

Thank reviewers for their time
Ask questions if requirements are unclear
Make requested changes promptly
Update PR description as changes evolve
Don't take feedback personally - it's about the code

If You Disagree:

Explain your reasoning clearly
Provide context for your decisions
Be open to alternative approaches
Defer to maintainer judgment when in doubt

For Reviewers

What to Check:

Area	Questions to Ask
Correctness	Does the code do what it claims?
Tests	Are tests comprehensive? Do they pass?
Style	Does it follow bash conventions?
Documentation	Are comments and docs updated?
Breaking Changes	Will this affect existing users?
Performance	Any obvious performance issues?

Review Best Practices:

Be constructive - Focus on improvements, not criticism
Be specific - Point to exact lines when possible
Explain why - Help contributors learn
Acknowledge good work - Note well-written code
Approve when ready - Don't hold PRs hostage

Quality Standards

Quality Gates

All PRs must pass these automated checks:

Gate	Requirement	Enforcement
Unit Tests	100% pass	Blocks merge
Integration Tests	100% pass	Blocks merge
Coverage	85%	Informational only
Conventional Commits	Required	Manual review
Documentation	Updated	Manual review

Documentation Standards

When to Update Documentation:

Adding new CLI flags → Update README.md, CLAUDE.md
Adding new features → Update README.md "Features" section
Changing behavior → Update relevant docs
Adding new patterns → Update CLAUDE.md

Keep in Sync:

CLAUDE.md - Technical specifications, quality standards
README.md - User-facing documentation, installation
Templates - Keep template files current
Inline comments - Update when code changes

Feature Completion Checklist

Before marking any feature complete:

All tests pass (100% pass rate)
Script functionality manually tested
Commits follow conventional format
All commits pushed to remote
CI/CD pipeline passes
CLAUDE.md updated (if new patterns)
README.md updated (if user-facing)
Breaking changes documented
Installation verified (if applicable)

Community Guidelines

Priority Contribution Areas

High Priority - Help Needed!

Test Implementation - Expand test coverage
- See IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md for specifications
Feature Development
- Log rotation functionality
- Dry-run mode
- Config file support (.ralphrc)
- Metrics tracking
- Desktop notifications
- Backup/rollback system
Documentation
- Usage tutorials and examples
- Troubleshooting guides
- Video walkthroughs
Real-World Testing
- Use Ralph on your projects
- Report bugs and edge cases
- Share your experience

Communication

Before Major Changes:

Open an issue for discussion
Check existing issues for planned work
Join discussions on pull requests

Getting Help:

Review documentation first (README.md, CLAUDE.md)
Check IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md for roadmap
Open issues for questions
Reference related issues in discussions

Code of Conduct

Be respectful and professional
Welcome newcomers and help them succeed
Focus on constructive feedback
Assume good intentions
Celebrate diverse perspectives

Recognition

All contributors acknowledged in release notes
Significant contributions noted in README
Active contributors may become maintainers

Additional Resources

README.md - Project overview and quick start
CLAUDE.md - Technical specifications
IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md - Development roadmap
IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md - Progress tracking
GitHub Issues - Bug reports and feature requests

Thank you for contributing to Ralph! Your efforts help make autonomous AI development more accessible to everyone.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Contributing to Ralph for Claude Code

Table of Contents

Getting Started

Prerequisites

Clone the Repository

Install Dependencies

Verify Your Setup

Project Structure

Development Workflow

Branch Naming Conventions

Commit Message Format

Workflow Diagram

Code Style Guidelines

Bash Best Practices

Testing Requirements

Mandatory Testing Standards

Test Organization

Running Tests

Writing Tests

Pull Request Process

Before Creating a PR

Creating the PR

After PR Creation

Code Review Guidelines

For Contributors

For Reviewers

Quality Standards

Quality Gates

Documentation Standards

Feature Completion Checklist

Community Guidelines

Priority Contribution Areas

Communication

Code of Conduct

Recognition

Additional Resources

FilesExpand file tree

CONTRIBUTING.md

Latest commit

History

CONTRIBUTING.md

File metadata and controls

Contributing to Ralph for Claude Code

Table of Contents

Getting Started

Prerequisites

Clone the Repository

Install Dependencies

Verify Your Setup

Project Structure

Development Workflow

Branch Naming Conventions

Commit Message Format

Workflow Diagram

Code Style Guidelines

Bash Best Practices

Testing Requirements

Mandatory Testing Standards

Test Organization

Running Tests

Writing Tests

Pull Request Process

Before Creating a PR

Creating the PR

After PR Creation

Code Review Guidelines

For Contributors

For Reviewers

Quality Standards

Quality Gates

Documentation Standards

Feature Completion Checklist

Community Guidelines

Priority Contribution Areas

Communication

Code of Conduct

Recognition

Additional Resources