Conversation
|
@gajus my concern is that this is not backward-compatible (from what I can tell) since |
|
Sorry, I meant as a configuration. |
|
@gajus you mean as a separate rule? |
I think it doesn't necessitate a separate rule. However, Alternatively, a new rule, |
|
Hm, not sure I understand. Isn't the rule already accepting a configuration? I just added another option for mixed there. |
Sorry. Ignore my comments. :-) |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 3.0.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Fixes #361