Clarify what part of message retention is still experimental (element-hq#17099)

### Pull Request Checklist

<!-- Please read
https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html
before submitting your pull request -->

* [X] Pull request is based on the develop branch
* [x] Pull request includes a [changelog
file](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#changelog).
The entry should:
- Be a short description of your change which makes sense to users.
"Fixed a bug that prevented receiving messages from other servers."
instead of "Moved X method from `EventStore` to `EventWorkerStore`.".
  - Use markdown where necessary, mostly for `code blocks`.
  - End with either a period (.) or an exclamation mark (!).
  - Start with a capital letter.
- Feel free to credit yourself, by adding a sentence "Contributed by
@github_username." or "Contributed by [Your Name]." to the end of the
entry.
* [X] [Code
style](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/code_style.html) is
correct
(run the
[linters](https://element-hq.github.io/synapse/latest/development/contributing_guide.html#run-the-linters))

Author: devonh

changelog.d/17099.doc

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Clarify what part of message retention is still experimental.

docs/message_retention_policies.md

@@ -7,8 +7,10 @@ follow the semantics described in
 and allow server and room admins to configure how long messages should
 be kept in a homeserver's database before being purged from it.
 **Please note that, as this feature isn't part of the Matrix
-specification yet, this implementation is to be considered as
-experimental.**
+specification yet, the use of `m.room.retention` events for per-room
+retention policies is to be considered as experimental. However, the use
+of a default message retention policy is considered a stable feature
+in Synapse.**
 
 A message retention policy is mainly defined by its `max_lifetime`
 parameter, which defines how long a message can be kept around after