|
| 1 | +/- |
| 2 | +Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved. |
| 3 | +Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE. |
| 4 | +Authors: Bhavik Mehta |
| 5 | +
|
| 6 | +! This file was ported from Lean 3 source module category_theory.limits.shapes.split_coequalizer |
| 7 | +! leanprover-community/mathlib commit 024a4231815538ac739f52d08dd20a55da0d6b23 |
| 8 | +! Please do not edit these lines, except to modify the commit id |
| 9 | +! if you have ported upstream changes. |
| 10 | +-/ |
| 11 | +import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Equalizers |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +/-! |
| 14 | +# Split coequalizers |
| 15 | +
|
| 16 | +We define what it means for a triple of morphisms `f g : X ⟶ Y`, `π : Y ⟶ Z` to be a split |
| 17 | +coequalizer: there is a section `s` of `π` and a section `t` of `g`, which additionally satisfy |
| 18 | +`t ≫ f = π ≫ s`. |
| 19 | +
|
| 20 | +In addition, we show that every split coequalizer is a coequalizer |
| 21 | +(`CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer.isCoequalizer`) and absolute |
| 22 | +(`CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer.map`) |
| 23 | +
|
| 24 | +A pair `f g : X ⟶ Y` has a split coequalizer if there is a `Z` and `π : Y ⟶ Z` making `f,g,π` a |
| 25 | +split coequalizer. |
| 26 | +A pair `f g : X ⟶ Y` has a `G`-split coequalizer if `G f, G g` has a split coequalizer. |
| 27 | +
|
| 28 | +These definitions and constructions are useful in particular for the monadicity theorems. |
| 29 | +
|
| 30 | +## TODO |
| 31 | +
|
| 32 | +Dualise to split equalizers. |
| 33 | +-/ |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +namespace CategoryTheory |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +universe v v₂ u u₂ |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +variable (G : C ⥤ D) |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +variable {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +/-- A split coequalizer diagram consists of morphisms |
| 49 | +
|
| 50 | + f π |
| 51 | + X ⇉ Y → Z |
| 52 | + g |
| 53 | +
|
| 54 | +satisfying `f ≫ π = g ≫ π` together with morphisms |
| 55 | +
|
| 56 | + t s |
| 57 | + X ← Y ← Z |
| 58 | +
|
| 59 | +satisfying `s ≫ π = 𝟙 Z`, `t ≫ g = 𝟙 Y` and `t ≫ f = π ≫ s`. |
| 60 | +
|
| 61 | +The name "coequalizer" is appropriate, since any split coequalizer is a coequalizer, see |
| 62 | +`Category_theory.IsSplitCoequalizer.isCoequalizer`. |
| 63 | +Split coequalizers are also absolute, since a functor preserves all the structure above. |
| 64 | +-/ |
| 65 | +structure IsSplitCoequalizer {Z : C} (π : Y ⟶ Z) where |
| 66 | + /-- A map from the coequalizer to `Y` -/ |
| 67 | + rightSection : Z ⟶ Y |
| 68 | + /-- A map in the opposite direction to `f` and `g` -/ |
| 69 | + leftSection : Y ⟶ X |
| 70 | + /-- Composition of `π` with `f` and with `g` agree -/ |
| 71 | + condition : f ≫ π = g ≫ π |
| 72 | + /-- `rightSection` splits `π` -/ |
| 73 | + rightSection_π : rightSection ≫ π = 𝟙 Z |
| 74 | + /-- `leftSection` splits `g` -/ |
| 75 | + leftSection_bottom : leftSection ≫ g = 𝟙 Y |
| 76 | + /-- `leftSection` composed with `f` is `pi` composed with `rightSection` -/ |
| 77 | + leftSection_top : leftSection ≫ f = π ≫ rightSection |
| 78 | +#align category_theory.is_split_coequalizer CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer |
| 79 | +#align category_theory.is_split_coequalizer.right_section CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer.rightSection |
| 80 | +#align category_theory.is_split_coequalizer.left_section CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer.leftSection |
| 81 | +#align category_theory.is_split_coequalizer.right_section_π CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer.rightSection_π |
| 82 | +#align category_theory.is_split_coequalizer.left_section_bottom CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer.leftSection_bottom |
| 83 | +#align category_theory.is_split_coequalizer.left_section_top CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer.leftSection_top |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +instance {X : C} : Inhabited (IsSplitCoequalizer (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X) (𝟙 X)) where |
| 86 | + default := ⟨𝟙 X, 𝟙 X, rfl, Category.id_comp _, Category.id_comp _, rfl⟩ |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +open IsSplitCoequalizer |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +attribute [reassoc] condition |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] rightSection_π leftSection_bottom leftSection_top |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +variable {f g} |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +/-- Split coequalizers are absolute: they are preserved by any functor. -/ |
| 97 | +@[simps] |
| 98 | +def IsSplitCoequalizer.map {Z : C} {π : Y ⟶ Z} (q : IsSplitCoequalizer f g π) (F : C ⥤ D) : |
| 99 | + IsSplitCoequalizer (F.map f) (F.map g) (F.map π) |
| 100 | + where |
| 101 | + rightSection := F.map q.rightSection |
| 102 | + leftSection := F.map q.leftSection |
| 103 | + condition := by rw [← F.map_comp, q.condition, F.map_comp] |
| 104 | + rightSection_π := by rw [← F.map_comp, q.rightSection_π, F.map_id] |
| 105 | + leftSection_bottom := by rw [← F.map_comp, q.leftSection_bottom, F.map_id] |
| 106 | + leftSection_top := by rw [← F.map_comp, q.leftSection_top, F.map_comp] |
| 107 | +#align category_theory.is_split_coequalizer.map CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer.map |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +section |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +open Limits |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +/-- A split coequalizer clearly induces a cofork. -/ |
| 114 | +@[simps! pt] |
| 115 | +def IsSplitCoequalizer.asCofork {Z : C} {h : Y ⟶ Z} (t : IsSplitCoequalizer f g h) : |
| 116 | + Cofork f g := Cofork.ofπ h t.condition |
| 117 | +#align category_theory.is_split_coequalizer.as_cofork CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer.asCofork |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +@[simp] |
| 120 | +theorem IsSplitCoequalizer.asCofork_π {Z : C} {h : Y ⟶ Z} (t : IsSplitCoequalizer f g h) : |
| 121 | + t.asCofork.π = h := rfl |
| 122 | +#align category_theory.is_split_coequalizer.as_cofork_π CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer.asCofork_π |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +/-- |
| 125 | +The cofork induced by a split coequalizer is a coequalizer, justifying the name. In some cases it |
| 126 | +is more convenient to show a given cofork is a coequalizer by showing it is split. |
| 127 | +-/ |
| 128 | +def IsSplitCoequalizer.isCoequalizer {Z : C} {h : Y ⟶ Z} (t : IsSplitCoequalizer f g h) : |
| 129 | + IsColimit t.asCofork := |
| 130 | + Cofork.IsColimit.mk' _ fun s => |
| 131 | + ⟨t.rightSection ≫ s.π, by |
| 132 | + dsimp |
| 133 | + rw [← t.leftSection_top_assoc, s.condition, t.leftSection_bottom_assoc], fun hm => by |
| 134 | + simp [← hm]⟩ |
| 135 | +#align category_theory.is_split_coequalizer.is_coequalizer CategoryTheory.IsSplitCoequalizer.isCoequalizer |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +end |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +variable (f g) |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +/-- |
| 142 | +The pair `f,g` is a split pair if there is a `h : Y ⟶ Z` so that `f, g, h` forms a split coequalizer |
| 143 | +in `C`. |
| 144 | +-/ |
| 145 | +class HasSplitCoequalizer : Prop where |
| 146 | + /-- There is some split coequalizer -/ |
| 147 | + splittable : ∃ (Z : C)(h : Y ⟶ Z), Nonempty (IsSplitCoequalizer f g h) |
| 148 | +#align category_theory.has_split_coequalizer CategoryTheory.HasSplitCoequalizer |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +/-- |
| 151 | +The pair `f,g` is a `G`-split pair if there is a `h : G Y ⟶ Z` so that `G f, G g, h` forms a split |
| 152 | +coequalizer in `D`. |
| 153 | +-/ |
| 154 | +abbrev Functor.IsSplitPair : Prop := |
| 155 | + HasSplitCoequalizer (G.map f) (G.map g) |
| 156 | +#align category_theory.functor.is_split_pair CategoryTheory.Functor.IsSplitPair |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | +/-- Get the coequalizer object from the typeclass `IsSplitPair`. -/ |
| 159 | +noncomputable def HasSplitCoequalizer.coequalizerOfSplit [HasSplitCoequalizer f g] : C := |
| 160 | + (@splittable _ _ _ _ f g).choose |
| 161 | +#align category_theory.has_split_coequalizer.coequalizer_of_split CategoryTheory.HasSplitCoequalizer.coequalizerOfSplit |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +/-- Get the coequalizer morphism from the typeclass `IsSplitPair`. -/ |
| 164 | +noncomputable def HasSplitCoequalizer.coequalizerπ [HasSplitCoequalizer f g] : |
| 165 | + Y ⟶ HasSplitCoequalizer.coequalizerOfSplit f g := |
| 166 | + (@splittable _ _ _ _ f g).choose_spec.choose |
| 167 | +#align category_theory.has_split_coequalizer.coequalizer_π CategoryTheory.HasSplitCoequalizer.coequalizerπ |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +/-- The coequalizer morphism `coequalizeπ` gives a split coequalizer on `f,g`. -/ |
| 170 | +noncomputable def HasSplitCoequalizer.isSplitCoequalizer [HasSplitCoequalizer f g] : |
| 171 | + IsSplitCoequalizer f g (HasSplitCoequalizer.coequalizerπ f g) := |
| 172 | + Classical.choice (@splittable _ _ _ _ f g).choose_spec.choose_spec |
| 173 | +#align category_theory.has_split_coequalizer.is_split_coequalizer CategoryTheory.HasSplitCoequalizer.isSplitCoequalizer |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +/-- If `f, g` is split, then `G f, G g` is split. -/ |
| 176 | +instance map_is_split_pair [HasSplitCoequalizer f g] : HasSplitCoequalizer (G.map f) (G.map g) |
| 177 | + where splittable := |
| 178 | + ⟨_, _, ⟨IsSplitCoequalizer.map (HasSplitCoequalizer.isSplitCoequalizer f g) _⟩⟩ |
| 179 | +#align category_theory.map_is_split_pair CategoryTheory.map_is_split_pair |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +namespace Limits |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +/-- If a pair has a split coequalizer, it has a coequalizer. -/ |
| 184 | +instance (priority := 1) hasCoequalizer_of_hasSplitCoequalizer [HasSplitCoequalizer f g] : |
| 185 | + HasCoequalizer f g := |
| 186 | + HasColimit.mk ⟨_, (HasSplitCoequalizer.isSplitCoequalizer f g).isCoequalizer⟩ |
| 187 | +#align category_theory.limits.has_coequalizer_of_has_split_coequalizer CategoryTheory.Limits.hasCoequalizer_of_hasSplitCoequalizer |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +end Limits |
| 190 | + |
| 191 | +end CategoryTheory |
| 192 | + |
0 commit comments