Skip to content

Actions: milvus-io/pymilvus

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
2,500+ workflow runs
2,500+ workflow runs

Filter by Workflow

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Event

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Status

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Branch

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Actor

⌥ + click/return to exclude
fix:use list join instead of += to operate bytes to prevent oom Test on pull request #3809: Pull request #3181 synchronize by jac0626
11m 58s jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
11m 58s
fix:use list join instead of += to operate bytes to prevent oom Code checker on pull request #3009: Pull request #3181 synchronize by jac0626
7m 6s jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
7m 6s
fix:use list join instead of += to operate bytes to prevent oom Check proto on pull request #3174: Pull request #3181 synchronize by jac0626
7m 57s jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
7m 57s
fix:use list join instead of += to operate bytes to prevent oom Test on pull request #3808: Pull request #3181 synchronize by jac0626
8m 41s jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
8m 41s
fix:use list join instead of += to operate bytes to prevent oom Code checker on pull request #3008: Pull request #3181 synchronize by jac0626
1m 57s jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
1m 57s
fix:use list join instead of += to operate bytes to prevent oom Check proto on pull request #3173: Pull request #3181 synchronize by jac0626
6m 46s jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
6m 46s
[Backport 2.6] fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arrays (#3182) Backport #56: Pull request #3183 closed by sre-ci-robot
8s
8s
[Backport 2.6] fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to sup… Publish Python 🐍 distributions 📦 to TestPyPI #1557: Commit 0c0c67a pushed by sre-ci-robot
37s 2.6
2.6
37s
[Backport 2.6] fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to sup… Test on pull request #3807: Commit 0c0c67a pushed by sre-ci-robot
3m 40s 2.6
2.6
3m 40s
fix:use list join instead of += to operate bytes to prevent oom Test on pull request #3806: Pull request #3181 synchronize by jac0626
4m 10s jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
4m 10s
fix:use list join instead of += to operate bytes to prevent oom Code checker on pull request #3007: Pull request #3181 synchronize by jac0626
54s jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
54s
fix:use list join instead of += to operate bytes to prevent oom Check proto on pull request #3172: Pull request #3181 synchronize by jac0626
1m 39s jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
1m 39s
[Backport 2.6] fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arrays (#3182) Test on pull request #3805: Pull request #3183 opened by pymilvus-bot
3m 28s backport-3182-to-2.6-1767867166-15170
backport-3182-to-2.6-1767867166-15170
3m 28s
[Backport 2.6] fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arrays (#3182) Check proto on pull request #3171: Pull request #3183 opened by pymilvus-bot
58s backport-3182-to-2.6-1767867166-15170
backport-3182-to-2.6-1767867166-15170
58s
[Backport 2.6] fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arrays (#3182) Code checker on pull request #3006: Pull request #3183 opened by pymilvus-bot
55s backport-3182-to-2.6-1767867166-15170
backport-3182-to-2.6-1767867166-15170
55s
fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arrays Backport #55: Pull request #3182 closed by sre-ci-robot
20s
20s
fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arra… Publish Python 🐍 distributions 📦 to TestPyPI #1556: Commit 7fe32ed pushed by sre-ci-robot
38s master
master
38s
fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arra… Test on pull request #3804: Commit 7fe32ed pushed by sre-ci-robot
3m 54s master
master
3m 54s
fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arrays Check proto on pull request #3170: Pull request #3182 synchronize by XuanYang-cn
56s zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
56s
fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arrays Code checker on pull request #3005: Pull request #3182 synchronize by XuanYang-cn
1m 4s zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
1m 4s
fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arrays Test on pull request #3803: Pull request #3182 synchronize by XuanYang-cn
3m 14s zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
3m 14s
fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arrays Code checker on pull request #3004: Pull request #3182 opened by zhuwenxing
50s zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
50s
fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arrays Test on pull request #3802: Pull request #3182 opened by zhuwenxing
3m 23s zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
3m 23s
fix: struct_validator returns True instead of x to support empty arrays Check proto on pull request #3169: Pull request #3182 opened by zhuwenxing
1m 4s zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
zhuwenxing:fix/struct-validator-empty-array
1m 4s
fix:use list join instead of += to operate bytes to prevent oom Check proto on pull request #3168: Pull request #3181 synchronize by jac0626
52s jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
jac0626:fix/bytes_oom
52s
ProTip! You can narrow down the results and go further in time using created:<2026-01-08 or the other filters available.
⚡