Feature request: Role-based Issues section access control #191479
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
This doesn't exist at the repo settings level right now. The closest you can get natively is disabling issues entirely, or using issue templates with blank issues turned off. The second option is probably what you want:
blank_issues_enabled: false
contact_links:
- name: Community Discussions
url: https://github.com/yourorg/yourrepo/discussions
about: Questions, feedback, and informal reports go hereThis removes the "Open a blank issue" option from the new issue page and lets you redirect people to Discussions. It doesn't technically block anyone from filing an issue via the API or direct URL, but it removes the friction for casual users who follow the UI flow. For actual role-based access control scoped to the Issues section, that's a gap in GitHub's permission model right now. The org-level roles (triage, write, maintain) don't let you carve out Issues specifically. Your best bet is filing this at https://github.com/github/feedback with the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏷️ Discussion Type
Question
💬 Feature/Topic Area
Issues
Body
Requested feature
Ability for repository owners to manage accesses to a repository's Issues section based on the user role (eg.
contributor,collaboratorandmember) and the access type (eg.read-onlyandread-write).Need
Related
Guidelines
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions