Replies: 2 comments
-
The new RBAC is a bug we fixed in #1145, we completely missed this bit. You were not expected to update any RBAC manually.
What problems did this cause? The
This was the old probe. The new manifest has dedicated probes, already configured in the manifest in the release. We have to document the new authorisation process to query the metrics, I simply haven't found the time to PR the docs. If you are not scraping the metrics to e.g. Prometheus, this is a no-op for you.
We don't expect the "upgrade" to be performed as you did. Just updating the image and tag. The YAML manifest attached in the release contains all the updated objects (except the events bit). The release notes are not a substitute for the docs, nor for testing upgrades in a staging environment. There's also a big warning in the release notes, which I hoped would hint everyone to tread this new version carefully. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We're deploying the operator via the bitnami chart, not via the 1 big manifest. Which is another can of worms that has had his own share of discussion already, not going to continue on that. I'm sorry if this came of as you broke our production because the release notes were insufficient that was not my intent. As for the big warning, that's only about the containers being served from a different registry now, not about any possible functionality changes. Something like There has been some major refactorings (migrating to Kubebuilder V4), expect changes on how the operator has to be deployed (probes, metrics endpoints, RBAC, etc...) would already be a big help. I get that you missed some things and fixed them afterwards (like the RBAC), but I personally would have edited the existing release notes to tell users to either manually apply them, or wait for the next release. Anyways, love your work on the operator, just wanted to suggest some improvements on the release notes, that's all. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Describe the bug
We recently updated from v1.18.3 to v1.19.0. We read the changelog, changed the registry we're pulling from and figured we should be fine, bumped the tag and figured we should be fine.
But we weren't:
These seem to be part of #1105
Reproduction steps
Update operator, notice the undocumented changes
Expected behavior
For the changes to be correctly documented
Additional context
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions