Update bytemuck#3858
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
@jamie-osec is attempting to deploy a commit to the Solana Foundation Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 1 Skipped Deployment
|
jacobcreech
approved these changes
Aug 19, 2025
Collaborator
|
@swaroop-osec I assume that this version change isn't going to break anything wrt zero copy implementation? |
swaroop-osec
pushed a commit
to swaroop-osec/anchor
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2025
WilfredAlmeida
pushed a commit
to KartikSoneji/anchor
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 22, 2025
Otter-0x4ka5h
pushed a commit
to Otter-0x4ka5h/anchor
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bytemuck's Pod implementation creates a struct that looks like StructWithoutPadding([u8; ]) and transmutes it as part of checking that the derive is sound.
Likely due to better dead code analysis, Rust 1.89 notices that the array is never read directly and emits a warning about this. Newer versions of bytemuck use a different approach that don't fire a warning.
Update both crates to avoid this causing CI to fail.