Shade jersey dependencies in JDBC to avoid conflicts with jersey-test.#202
Merged
rnorth merged 1 commit intotestcontainers:masterfrom Aug 16, 2016
kunickiaj:jersey_shade_jdbc
Merged
Shade jersey dependencies in JDBC to avoid conflicts with jersey-test.#202rnorth merged 1 commit intotestcontainers:masterfrom kunickiaj:jersey_shade_jdbc
rnorth merged 1 commit intotestcontainers:masterfrom
kunickiaj:jersey_shade_jdbc
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Should resolve #196
Symptoms I encountered were a NoSuchMethod error on
RankedProvider.getContractTypes()It appeared that the jdbc module included both shaded and non-shaded Jersey dependencies. This should ensure that the packaged classes are shaded.