Fixing Pydantic Extension

[sydney-runkle]

Hey tfranzel,

Thanks for your help with adding support for pydantic a few weeks ago.

It came to my attention earlier today while running some tests that the __schema_cache__ from pydantic was causing problems when any of the pages associated with the schema views were refreshed. The model_schema function from pydantic doesn't use a cache, whereas the model.schema() does utilize this cache. Additionally, the ref_prefix param of the model_schema function allows for the removal of some of the other functionality we hard coded.

I came up with the above solution based on the pydantic documentation as well as this previously opened issue.

Let me know what you think!

[tfranzel]

excellent point @sydney-runkle. it is the better implementation.

I totally forgot about #801 and reimplemented the extension. 🤣 I wonder though how he got the extension working without the 3 fixes we applied specifically for this to work.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (e0f749e) 98.54% compared to head (f31c7a6) 98.54%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1021   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.54%   98.54%           
=======================================
  Files          68       68           
  Lines        8338     8338           
=======================================
  Hits         8217     8217           
  Misses        121      121           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[tfranzel]

excellent! thx sydney.