Switch to Ubuntu for docker#10100
Conversation
Sir-Boops
commented
Feb 23, 2019
Sir-Boops
commented
- Based on my image Here
- 200~ish MB smaller then the current build ( When built right )
- Build with jemalloc for slightly less ram usage
- /Should/ be an exact drop in replacement ( I've been told by other that switched to using this image that's a complete drop in replacement and I don't see any reason it wouldn't be but another confirmation would be nice 😄 )
- Only real downfall of this image is it has to be built using --squash ( docker beta feature ) or the image size will be huge from all the individual RUNs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why sirboops namespace instead of official images?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just so everything is built using the same libs
Official images afaik use alpine/Deb not Ubuntu
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you want everything built here I can switch it over to this
Just means alot longer build times
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In for a penny, in for a pound. Let's switch to that. Just to have more confidence over long-term availability of these images.
|
Updated to build everything locally I haven't tested this exact build on a live server yet but everything built and assets compiled just fine locally 👍 |
|
Thanks for the work @Sir-Boops. I agree with the local building method over prebaked images :) |
3 participants
