Generated: 2026-03-12 03:15 UTC
Next scheduled update: 2026-03-19
- Executive Summary
- Entity Tracker
- Bill Tracker
- Lobbying Summary
- FOIA Request Status
- Key Findings (HIGH Confidence)
- Timeline (Recent Events)
- Source Index
| Metric | Count |
|---|---|
| Total tasks | 72 |
| Completed | 72 |
| In progress | 0 |
| Pending | 0 |
| Completion rate | 100.0% |
| Data Type | Count |
|---|---|
| Findings | 283 (HIGH: 184, MEDIUM: 93, LOW: 6) |
| Entities tracked | 75 |
| Sources indexed | 94 |
| Bills tracked | 11 |
| Timeline events | 35 |
| Phase | Progress | % |
|---|---|---|
| automation | 6/6 | 100% |
| gpl_compliance | 10/10 | 100% |
| kernel_influence | 10/10 | 100% |
| legislative_lobbying | 20/20 | 100% |
| setup | 10/10 | 100% |
| standards_capture | 4/4 | 100% |
| synthesis | 12/12 | 100% |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CCME | Council for a Connected Modern Economy | |
| Digital Childhood Alliance | DCA |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| T-Scy Consortium | T-Scy, Trust & Safety Technology Consortium | EU consortium developing open-source age verification blueprint |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Arabella Advisors | Arabella; Sunflower Services | Dark money pass-through network managing New Venture Fund, Windward Fund, Sixteen Thirty Fund, and others. Acquired by Sunflower Services in late 2025. Adam Eichberg (Headwaters/Meta lobbyist) chairs NVF board and is incoming Sunflower Services board chair. |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Facebook Inc | Meta Platforms Inc | |
| Meta Platforms Inc | Facebook Inc, Meta, Oculus | Patent holder for microkernel / XR OS architecture patents |
| Meta Platforms Technologies LLC | Oculus VR, Reality Labs |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| EU Digital Identity Wallet (EUDIW) | EUDIW, eIDAS 2.0 Wallet | EU-mandated open-source digital identity framework with age verification capability |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Rep Amy Paschal | ||
| Rep Kim Carver | LA HB-570 author | |
| Sen Jay Morris | ||
| Sen Matt Ball |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Headwaters Strategies | Headwaters Strategies, Inc. | Denver-based lobbying firm, Meta client since Dec 2019. Founded 2009. Principals: Will Coyne, Adam Eichberg. Staff: Alyson Schmidt, Amber Burkhart. Address: 1660 Lincoln St, Suite 2910, Denver, CO 80264. Phone: (303) 834-7799. CO-only operations, $0 federal lobbying. |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Center for Secure and Modern Elections | CSME | Project of the New Venture Fund. Also a Headwaters Strategies lobbying client. Represents overlap between Eichberg board role (NVF chair) and firm client base. |
| ConnectSafely | ||
| ICMEC | International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children | |
| New Venture Fund | NVF | Part of Arabella Advisors dark money network. Board chaired by Adam Eichberg (Headwaters Strategies co-founder). Fiscal sponsor for advocacy projects including Center for Secure and Modern Elections (also a Headwaters client). |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Digital Childhood Alliance | DCA | EIN 33-2669790 (found 2026-03-16). 501(c)(4) Inc. Delaware. 213 N Market St PMB 1039, Wilmington DE 19801. Officer: Melissa McKay. Tax year 2024: gross receipts <$25K (990-N e-Postcard). Not on ProPublica, GuideStar, or Charity Navigator. Meta-funded (Bloomberg, confirmed by ED Casey Stefanski under oath). Processes donations via For Good DAF as Project 258136. Real operational funding does not flow through this EIN. |
| Digital Childhood Institute | DCI | EIN 39-3684798. 501(c)(3) founded by Melissa McKay. IRS ruling Nov 2025. Wilmington DE (same address as DCA). States it does not accept tech platform funding. Sister org to DCA (501(c)(4)). |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ATEP | American Technology Excellence Project | $45M from Meta |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Adam Eichberg | EICHBERG, ADAM | Co-founder of Headwaters Strategies. Former Deputy Legislative Director for Gov. Bill Ritter. Chair of the Board of the New Venture Fund (Arabella Advisors network). Founding board member of Windward Fund. Incoming board chair of Sunflower Services (Arabella acquirer). |
| Alexei Starovoitov | @meta.com, @fb.com | Meta BPF engineer. BPF co-maintainer and original author. Co-created eBPF (extended BPF) while at PLUMgrid, then joined Facebook/Meta. Serves as BPF subsystem co-maintainer alongside Daniel Borkmann. Controls the direction of BPF development. |
| Alyson Schmidt | Schmidt, Alyson; Aly Schmidt | Headwaters Strategies staff. Previously at Colorado Hospital Association. Registered Meta lobbyist in Colorado. |
| Amber Burkhart | Burkhart, Amber Janelle | Headwaters Strategies Public Affairs Associate. Previously at Arnold Ventures and Colorado Hospital Association. MS Health Economics, LSE. Registered Meta lobbyist in Colorado. |
| Andrii Nakryiko | @meta.com, @fb.com | Meta BPF engineer. BPF libraries maintainer, libbpf author. Primary author and maintainer of libbpf, the canonical BPF user-space library. Designed BPF CO-RE (Compile Once, Run Everywhere) architecture. Key architect of BPF tooling ecosystem. |
| Casey Stefanski | DCA Executive Director. Admitted tech company funding under oath (LA Senate). Former NCOSE Senior Director of Global Partnerships (10 years, but absent from all NCOSE 990 filings). UChicago public policy/economics degree. | |
| Josef Bacik | Meta, Anthropic | Kernel engineer. Btrfs maintainer. Moved Meta -> Anthropic. |
| Kathy Kam | Director of Open Source at Meta; LF Board Member (Platinum representative) | |
| Kirill Shutemov | Intel, Meta | Kernel engineer. memory management developer. Moved Intel -> Meta. |
| Martin KaFai Lau | @meta.com, @fb.com | Meta BPF engineer. BPF networking maintainer. Maintains BPF networking components. Contributed BPF socket storage, cgroup BPF, and other networking-specific BPF features used extensively in Meta's infrastructure. |
| Melissa McKay | DCA/DCI founder. Officer on EIN 33-2669790 (DCA) and EIN 39-3684798 (DCI). American Fork, UT mother of five. Co-authored Utah SB-142 with Sen. Todd Weiler. Pursuing federal ASAA with Sen. Mike Lee. | |
| Roman Gushchin | Meta, Google | Kernel engineer. cgroups/memory contributor. Moved Meta -> Google. |
| Song Liu | @meta.com, @fb.com | Meta BPF engineer. BPF contributor, live patching. Contributed BPF trampoline and live-patching support. Works on BPF performance features used in Meta's fleet. |
| Will Coyne | COYNE, WILLIAM C | Co-founder of Headwaters Strategies. Former Majority Chief of Staff, CO State House; chief of staff to Speakers Romanoff and Carroll. Registered Meta lobbyist in Colorado. |
| Yonghong Song | @meta.com, @fb.com | Meta BPF engineer. BPF compiler/BTF contributor. Key contributor to BTF (BPF Type Format) and BPF CO-RE compiler support in LLVM/Clang. Enables the 'compile once' paradigm that is central to Meta's BPF deployment strategy. |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Meta Horizon OS | Horizon OS, Quest OS, Meta Quest Platform | Meta's operating system for Quest VR headsets. Relevant compliance features: Age Category API, Family Center, Quest Store age ratings, minor account defaults. |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Khronos Group | Khronos | OpenXR standards body |
| Linux Foundation | LF | Nonprofit technology consortium hosting open-source projects |
| Name | Aliases | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Age Check Certification Scheme | AVPA member. We test that age check systems work The Age Check Certification Scheme is an independent 3rd party certification scheme for providers of age restricted goods, content or services. We test that age check systems work. The scheme can be utilised to provide full... | |
| AgeChecked | AVPA member. Compliant and secure online age verification for businesses Protect your business with Age Verification AgeChecked is a leading online age verification service provider. Discover how to protect your business and your customers by using our age verification solutions.... | |
| AgeKey/K-ID | AgeKey, K-ID, K-ID Foundation | Parent-verified age assurance; Meta partnership |
| BT Group | AVPA member. We’re one of the world’s leading communications services companies. The solutions we sell are integral to modern life. Our purpose is as simple as it is ambitious: we connect for good. There are no limits to what people can do when they connect. And as technology... | |
| BlueCheck | AVPA member. Age and Identity Verification Eliminate Risk. Know Your Customers. Protect Your Business. BlueCheck safeguards hundreds of businesses by providing flexible and customer friendly identity solutions. Age Verification Compliance for age-restricted products and services.... | |
| Centrebound Limited | AVPA member. Safeguarding Your Business Through Expert Compliance Testing As a leading provider of test purchasing services throughout UK and Ireland, Centrebound are trusted by leading organisations across multiple sectors. Our MSPA accreditation and deep industry expertise... | |
| CitizenCard | AVPA member. Prove your age and identity - enter pubs, clubs, take domestic flights, use as Voter ID and buy age-restricted goods in shops + get discounts online recognised by police recognised by retailers affordable and practical verifiable online anyone can apply We offer the... | |
| Concordium | AVPA member. Concordium is a public Layer-1 blockchain founded in 2018 by Lars Seier Christensen, founder of Saxo Bank. Concordium enables Smart Money — programmable digital assets with identity, privacy, and compliance embedded at the protocol layer. Backed by science and... | |
| Envoc | AVPA member. Louisiana's Legal Digital Driver's License 100% Legal for driving purposes per Louisiana law of Act 625 of the 2016 season. Louisiana State Police will accept the LA Wallet Digital Driver's License! ATC legally approved all responsible vendors to accept LA Wallet for... | |
| Experian | AVPA member. Ensure age verification restrictions are met Age verification is an important element of day-to-day responsible business activity across a variety of industries to ensure services are only delivered to those who are old enough to receive them. Experian age... | |
| FaceTec | AVPA member. FaceTec's pioneering 3D Face Biometrics are fast becoming the global standard in secure onboarding, KYC, and ongoing authentication, stopping ID fraud and unauthorized access for millions of users on six continents. FaceTec is relied upon for many of the world's... | |
| Fujitsu | AVPA member. An End-to-End Solution for Retail Age Assurance Designed to operate across all your customer sales channels Fujitsu’s digital age assurance solutions are designed to generate value for your business by increasing customer basket spend, reducing customer queue and... | |
| GeoComply | AVPA member. GeoComply provides location analytics services for digital platforms to support their compliance and risk programs. As laws and regulations—including age verification regulations—vary across countries, states, provinces, and other jurisdictions, online platforms need... | |
| IDVerse | AVPA member. IDVerse is focused on making user verification effortless through technology. We build intelligent tools that protect users from identity fraud while enabling a seamless user experience. We’re focused on removing the burden of identity verification for our customers... | |
| IKETech | AVPA member. At IKE Tech, we provide advanced at point of use continuous age gating technology designed to strengthen security and ensure that only authorized users can access and operate technology-based products. Our cutting edge innovation is equipped with a proprietary... | |
| Incode | AVPA member. Incode Technologies is a leader in the identity trust revolution, backed by investors including General Atlantic, CapitalOne, Coinbase, DN Capital, Framework Venture Partners, and 3L. At Incode, we're redefining the landscape of identity verification, KYB, and KYC... | |
| Innovative Technology | AVPA member. Method of Age Verification: Age estimation based on Artifical Intelligence algorithms. ICU runs all algorithms locally on the ICU hardware - which requires no internet connection. This result in a total off-line solution with unlimited age reads for a single one-off... | |
| Jumio | Jumio Corporation | Identity verification via document scanning |
| KJR | AVPA member. An Australian software quality engineering consultancy, that delivers. KJR specialises in software testing and trusted AI adoption. We are a proud Australian-owned company which believes in harnessing technology for meaningful impact. Distinguished by our dedication... | |
| Kids Web Services | AVPA member. KWS is a suite of tools and services provided to developers for free to help them manage youth audiences. Our Parent Verification and Consent Management products are relied on by some of the largest games and platforms in the world. Kids Web Services Ltd is part of... | |
| Luciditi | AVPA member. Luciditi™ is a Reusable Digital Identity Platform with a specific focus on Age proofing technology. It can be applied to a wide range of industry sectors, in particular those effected by new legislation such as the UK Online Safety Act 2023. Luciditi Age... | |
| MyMahi | AVPA member. MyMahi is a digital-platform designed to support learners through their educational journeys, with emphasis on identity, wellbeing, and future pathways. | |
| NEEDEMAND | AVPA member. Method of verification: BorderAge is an AI-based, age-verification solution that does not require the user to share any personal data. BorderAge’s absence of personal data collection ensures that it does not conflict with privacy protection laws and maximizes user... | |
| Netsweeper | AVPA member. Netsweeper has been Enforcing the laws on the Internet for over 25 years. Netsweeper's solution will Augment the Age Verification Solutions showing Governments that any Age Verification Solution can be enforced assisting in the final decision of implementing an Age... | |
| Ondato | AVPA member. Ondato is a Tech company streamlining KYC, Age Verification, and AML-related processes using cutting-edge AI solutions that cover the full spectrum of compliance challenges, from new client onboarding to a comprehensive database for ongoing client monitoring. As a... | |
| OneID | AVPA member. OneID® provides real-time verification that’s speedy, simple and safe. Meet compliance and deliver a frictionless experience to your customers with our highly effective and privacy preserving solution that’s UK government certified. Real-time age verification that’s... | |
| OpenAge | AVPA member. OpenAge The OpenAge iniitiative turns verified age attributes into reusable, anonymous, and interoperable AgeKeys, enabling age assurance that combines convenience, privacy, and compliance at scale. For users: AgeKeys provide a fast, seamless experience. After one... | |
| PRIVO | AVPA member. PRIVO is the leading global industry expert in minors’ online privacy, identity, and consent management. The PRIVO iD Platform helps companies block or engage responsibly with minors in websites, apps & digital services. The PRIVO iD Platform offers a suite of... | |
| Persona | AVPA member. Dynamic and highly effective age assurance for any use case. Meet global regulatory requirements, enforce rigorous privacy, accessibility, and ethical standards, and deliver the ideal user experience with Persona. Verify anyone, anywhere. Organizations putting online... | |
| Privately | AVPA member. We are an innovative technology company specialising in AI driven Age Assurance and online safety solutions, designed to meet the needs of diverse industries. As a GDPR-compliant company, our focus is on privacy-preserving technologies that enhance online safety for... | |
| Serve Legal | AVPA member. Serve Legal is the market leading provider of independent AV and compliance auditing services in the UK & Ireland. We deliver robust audit programmes for leading businesses across many sectors including grocery retail, gambling , hospitality & leisure, online... | |
| ShareRing | AVPA member. ShareRing is a next‑generation Decentralized Digital Identity Platform that empowers individuals and businesses to reclaim control over their digital selves. Built on robust blockchain technology, ShareRing delivers seamless, secure, and privacy‑first identity... | |
| Shufti | AVPA member. Shufti’s due diligence forms allow you to collect user data with predefined or custom industry models to ensure regulatory compliance. As part of the verification process, we make it easy to verify a user’s age to Identify minors and restrict their access to protect... | |
| Veratad | AVPA member. Flexible, Secure Age Verification Orchestrate customer age checks and ensure compliance with the industry’s most flexible online age verification solution. Reliably verify age within any business process or workflow Flexible deployment options Orchestrate custom age... | |
| Veriff | Veriff OÜ | Identity/age verification; biometric analysis |
| Verifymy | AVPA member. Verifymy was founded out of the frustration of a lack of fit-for-purpose age verification solutions available to online businesses. Prior to Verifymy, age verification was expensive, complex and inefficient. Our email estimation is a world first innovative approach to... | |
| Yoti | Yoti Ltd | Age estimation via facial analysis; Meta partnership |
| yoti | AVPA member. Methods of Age Verification: yoti age estimation via facial analysis yoti Digital ID app (10 million downloads) offering data minised age e.g. 13+ or 18+, yoti ID Verification embedded within an app or website Sectors: both online ecommerce of age restricted goods,... |
| State | Bill | Session | Title | Status | Sponsors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | AB-1043 | 2025-2026 | Age verification signals: software applications and onlin... | enacted | Buffy Wicks, Tom Umberg, Juan Alanis, Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, Diane Dixon, John Harabedian, Josh Hoover, Ash Kalra, Josh Lowenthal, Catherine Stefani, Akilah Weber Pierson |
| CO | SB26-051 | 2026 | Colorado SB26-051 | passed-senate | |
| IL | HB-3304 | 2025-2026 | Illinois HB-3304 | unknown | |
| IL | HB-4140 | 2025-2026 | Illinois HB-4140 | unknown | |
| IL | SB-2037 | 2025-2026 | Illinois SB-2037 | unknown | |
| LA | HB-570 | 2025 | Authorizes a taxing authority to adjust a millage rate to... | enacted | Roger Wilder |
| NY | S8102A | 2025-2026 | New York S8102A | unknown | |
| TX | SB-2420 | 2025 | Texas SB-2420 | enjoined | |
| US | KOSA | Federal KOSA | unknown | ||
| US | app-store-accountability-act | Federal app-store-accountability-act | unknown | Mike Lee, John James | |
| UT | SB-142 | 2025 | Utah SB-142 | enacted |
| Name | State | Client | Filing Period | Compensation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sachs, Dan | CO | Facebook Inc. | n/a | 0.0 |
| Martinez, Ana | CO | Facebook Inc. | n/a | 0.0 |
| COYNE, WILLIAM C | CO | Meta Platforms, Inc | n/a | 0.0 |
| EICHBERG, ADAM | CO | Meta Platforms, Inc | n/a | 0.0 |
| Schmidt, Alyson | CO | Meta Platforms, Inc | n/a | 0.0 |
| Headwaters Strategies | CO | Meta Platforms, Inc | n/a | 0.0 |
| Burkhart, Amber Janelle | CO | Meta Platforms, Inc | 02/09/26 | 0.0 |
| Sachs, Dan | CO | Meta Platforms, Inc. | n/a | 0.0 |
| Martinez, Ana | CO | Meta Platforms, Inc. | n/a | 0.0 |
| Diers, Tyler | CO | Meta Platforms, Inc. | n/a | 0.0 |
| KOCH, JOHN DUNBAR | LA | Digital Childhood Alliance, Inc. | 05/05/2025 - current | Yes |
| BORILL, JOSHUA G. | LA | Meta Platforms, INC. | 04/24/2023 - current | Yes |
| BAKER, COURTNEY L. | LA | Meta Platforms, Inc. | 01/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 | No |
| CAFFERY III, DONELSON T | LA | Meta Platforms, Inc. | 09/29/2025 - current | Yes |
| CORLEY, GINGER ADAM | LA | Meta Platforms, Inc. | 04/07/2025 - current | No |
| HINES, JAMES | LA | Meta Platforms, Inc. | 05/01/2023 - current | Yes |
| WILKERSON, MARYBETH | LA | Meta Platforms, Inc. | 03/09/2026 - current | Yes |
| HARBISON, JASON WILLIAM | LA | Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 09/29/2025 - current | Yes |
| ID | State | Custodian | Filed | Response Due | Status | Overdue? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CO | Secretary of State | 2026-03-10 | 2026-03-13 | pending | |
| 2 | CO | Attorney General | 2026-03-11 | 2026-03-14 | pending | |
| 3 | LA | Board of Ethics | 2026-03-11 | 2026-03-14 | pending |
Wayback Machine DCA website analysis (CDX API, 100+ snapshots, Dec 2024 - Mar 2026): NO version of the DCA website has EVER disclosed funding sources. No "supported by", "funded by", or sponsor logos section exists in any archived snapshot. The earliest snapshot (Dec 19, 2024, one day after domain registration) and all subsequent versions contain zero references to Meta, Facebook, or any tech company as a funder. Site evolution: Feb 2025 was a simple landing page with the App Store Accountability Act campaign. By Mar 2026, it expanded to include About Us, Our Team, Resources, Donate, state bill tracker, and ASAA bill page. Featured "Voices" include Heritage Foundation, NCOSE, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Institute for Family Studies — all conservative organizations. The complete absence of funding disclosure across ALL snapshots is consistent with deliberate donor anonymity under 501(c)(4) status, despite Meta funding being confirmed by Bloomberg and acknowledged by Stefanski under legislative questioning.
Sources: Wayback Machine CDX API, web.archive.org snapshots Recorded: 2026-03-12 03:15:48
Digital Childhood Institute (DCI) EIN FOUND: 39-3684798. Very new 501(c)(3) — IRS ruling date November 2025. Registered in Wilmington, DE with operations in Utah. Founded by Melissa McKay. No 990 filings exist yet. DCI EXPLICITLY states it does not accept tech platform funding — this contrasts with DCA (501(c)(4)) which confirmed accepting tech funding under questioning.
Sources: ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer, IRS TEOS Recorded: 2026-03-12 03:05:14
Digital Childhood Alliance (DCA) EIN FOUND: 33-2669790. "Digital Childhood Alliance Inc" registered in Delaware at 213 N Market Street PMB 1039, Wilmington, DE 19801 — same address as DCI (EIN 39-3684798). Officer: Melissa McKay. Tax year 2024. Gross receipts: under $25,000. Filing: 990-N (e-Postcard, zero financial disclosure). Entity is active.
Critical anomaly: DCA reports <$25K despite Meta funding (confirmed by Bloomberg July 2025), Casey Stefanski's admission of tech company funding under oath (LA Senate April 2025), and coordination of a 20+ state legislative campaign with paid staff. The <$25K threshold means DCA's operational budget does NOT flow through this EIN. EIN 33-2669790 is not on ProPublica, GuideStar, Candid, or Charity Navigator as of 2026-03-16.
Implications for prior findings: The investigation previously found DCA had no EIN in the IRS BMF (all 4 regional extracts). This EIN may have been assigned after that search, or 990-N filers may not appear in BMF extracts until processed. The For Good DAF registration paradox partially resolves — DCA could have registered using 33-2669790 — but the <$25K gross receipts confirm the NFG donation page generates negligible revenue. The fiscal sponsorship / direct Meta funding model remains the best explanation for DCA's actual operating budget.
Sources: eintaxid.com (https://eintaxid.com/company/332669790-digital-childhood-alliance-inc/) Recorded: 2026-03-16
ConnectSafely conflicts of interest: CEO Larry Magid serves on Meta's Safety Advisory Council and receives honorarium. Revenue is 89.7% contributions with $0 program service revenue. Executive compensation ($387K) consumes 57.5% of expenses ($673K). Magid earned $218,708 in 2024. Funded by Meta since at least 2017, also by Google, Microsoft, Snapchat. Magid has publicly OPPOSED certain child safety bills — effectively acting as a tech-industry voice while running a nominally independent child safety organization.
Sources: ConnectSafely 990 filings, ProPublica Recorded: 2026-03-12 03:05:14
California lobbying data: Meta spent $1,036,728 on CA state lobbying in Q1-Q3 2025 (record pace). Q2 2025 alone: $518,605 (highest single quarter ever). Paid CA Chamber of Commerce $3.1M. CRITICAL: Meta SUPPORTED AB-1043 publicly while its trade associations (TechNet, Chamber of Progress) OPPOSED it — Meta broke ranks to support a bill that burdens OS providers and app stores (Apple/Google) rather than platforms (Meta). This confirms the strategic interest hypothesis.
Sources: CalAccess, news reporting Recorded: 2026-03-12 03:05:14
LA Senate hearing testimony details: Sen. Jay Morris pressed Casey Stefanski (DCA ED) on funding. Stefanski said she was "not comfortable" answering, eventually confirmed tech companies fund DCA but refused to name them. She identified the "father of DCA's founder" as largest donor. DCA paid attorneys to draft model legislation. Meta's Nicole Lopez testified IN SUPPORT of HB-570. Apple and Google filed opposition but sent NO representatives to testify. DCA confirmed meeting with Google for broader support.
Sources: LA Senate Commerce Committee hearing, The Center Square, Deseret News Recorded: 2026-03-12 03:05:14
Arabella network scale: Sixteen Thirty Fund ($282M revenue, 318 grants totaling $236.5M in 2024), Windward Fund and Hopewell Fund combined 2023 revenue $370M. Including NVF, the Arabella network exceeds $1B annually. Adam Eichberg (Meta's CO lobbyist) chairs NVF board. All Arabella entities share 1828 L St NW, DC. No direct Arabella→child safety grant connection found yet, but Schedule I data (823+ grant recipients across NVF alone) could not be fully parsed.
Sources: ProPublica, InfluenceWatch, Arabella network 990 filings Recorded: 2026-03-12 03:05:14
Headwaters Strategies lobbying expenditure data (CO SODA API): Total Meta/Facebook payments to Headwaters: $338,500 (2019-2026). Combined Colorado lobbying income from Meta (Headwaters + in-house): $80K/year).$451,441. CRITICAL PATTERN: Monthly payments jumped from $100K/year), Burkhart $6,667/month ($5K/month (2019-2022) to $14-30K/month starting July 2023, coinciding with intensified state-level child safety legislation. Individual lobbyist incomes at current rates: Eichberg $15K/month ($180K/year), Schmidt $8,333/month (
Sources: CO SODA API datasets dxfk-9ifj and df5p-p6jt Recorded: 2026-03-12 03:02:26
LA HB-570 CORRECTED: The correct bill is "The App Store Accountability Act" (Act No. 481 of 2025), authored by Rep. Kim Carver (R-Bossier City). Signed by Governor Jeff Landry on June 30, 2025, effective July 1, 2026. Passed unanimously at every stage: House 99-0, Senate 39-0, both conference committee votes 98-0/38-0. Uses 4 age categories (child <13, younger teen 13-15, older teen 16-17, adult 18+). NOTE: LA uses different age brackets than CA/CO (13-15 instead of 13-16, 16-17 instead of 16-18). This is a third template bill in the same family, with Louisiana-specific variations.
Sources: legis.la.gov, Act No. 481 of 2025 Recorded: 2026-03-12 03:02:26
NVF 990 analysis: NVF (EIN 20-5806345) had $669M revenue, $593M in grants (2023). $103.4M specifically for youth development/education, with $59.2M in direct grants. NVF also spent $36.7M on lobbying including $31.2M in grants to OTHER orgs for lobbying. 823 domestic grant recipients on Schedule I. Could not parse full Schedule I (needs XML download). No direct NVF→DCA link found, but NVF grants to 501(c)(4) orgs would be unusual (NVF is 501(c)(3)). The $31.2M in lobbying grants to other organizations is a potential channel for indirect funding.
Sources: ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer, NVF 2023 Form 990 Recorded: 2026-03-12 03:02:26
DCA/DCI DNS/WHOIS deep dive: SHARED INFRASTRUCTURE CONFIRMED:
- Same registrar (GoDaddy) with privacy protection on both domains
- Same CDN (Cloudflare) on both
- Same email provider (Microsoft 365) on both
- CRITICAL: Same email marketing platform (Elastic Email) on both — indicates shared mass communications capability and likely same person/team set up both
- DCA has 4-year registration (through 2028, well-funded) vs DCI 1-year (expires June 2026)
- DCA registered Dec 18, 2024 — 6 months BEFORE DCI (June 13, 2025). This is reversed from normal pattern: typically the 501(c)(3) educational arm is established first, then the lobbying arm. DCA (lobbying) coming first suggests it was the primary objective.
- DCA has sophisticated email stack: Microsoft 365 + Google + Amazon SES + Elastic Email, indicating professional-grade infrastructure for a 3-month-old organization.
Sources: WHOIS registries, DNS records (dig MX/TXT/A/NS) Recorded: 2026-03-12 03:00:40
CO SB26-051 full text analysis — template bill comparison with CA AB-1043: IDENTICAL STRUCTURE: Both bills define the same terms in the same order: Account Holder, Age-Bracket Data, Age Signal, Application, Covered Application Store, Developer, Device, Operating System Provider, User. Both use the same four age brackets (under 13, 13-16, 16-18, 18+). Both impose the same penalties ($2,500 negligent / $7,500 intentional per minor). Both exempt only broadband ISPs, telecom services, and physical products. KEY DIFFERENCES: (1) CO effective date is Jan 1, 2028 (CA is Jan 1, 2027). (2) CO adds §6-30-105(6) exempting developers whose apps exclusively serve internal business communication, enterprise software sales, or technical support platforms. (3) CO uses "DEVICE" (§6-30-101(7)) defined as "ANY GENERAL-PURPOSE COMPUTING DEVICE" vs CA's "computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device." LINUX IMPACT: Both bills define "Operating System Provider" as any person that "develops, licenses, or controls" OS software on any device. Neither bill contains any FOSS/open-source exemption. "Covered Application Store" is defined broadly enough to include apt, dnf, flatpak, snap repositories. Both bills would require Linux distros to implement: (a) an account system collecting user birth dates, (b) a real-time age bracket API, (c) integration with application package managers. TEMPLATE BILL CONFIRMATION: The structural and substantive similarity confirms these are template bills. Both mirror the ICMEC "Digital Age Assurance Act" model legislation.
Sources: CO SB26-051 introduced text (PDF), CA AB-1043 Chapter 675 Recorded: 2026-03-12 02:24:10
ATEP strategic alignment with age verification advocacy: ATEP's three stated pillars include "putting parents in charge of how their kids experience online apps and AI technologies," directly aligning with the age attestation legislative agenda (AB-1043, SB26-051). ATEP is not registered as a federal FEC committee; it operates as a state-level Super PAC filing with individual state agencies. Of its $45M war chest, only $329K was spent by year-end 2025. The vast majority is still undeployed. Meta also spent $518K lobbying Sacramento specifically on child protection legislation, separate from PAC spending. The combination: (a) $45M ATEP for electing tech-friendly state legislators, (b) $518K direct CA lobbying, (c) DCA advocacy for age attestation bills, and (d) Headwaters Strategies lobbying in CO forms a multi-channel influence strategy where direct lobbying, PAC spending, and ostensibly-independent advocacy organizations deploy in parallel.
Sources: TechCrunch, Politico, Axios, CRBC News, FEC.gov Recorded: 2026-03-12 01:43:31
CO SB26-051 legislative details:
- Prime sponsors: Sen. Matt Ball, Sen. Larry Liston, Rep. Amy Paschal, Rep. Naquetta Ricks
- Co-sponsor: Sen. Nick Hinrichsen
- Introduced: 01/27/2026
- Committee hearing: 02/24/2026 (Senate Business, Labor & Technology)
- Amendment L.001 adopted in committee 02/24/2026
- Senate Third Reading: 03/03/2026, passed 28-7
- Status: Under consideration (awaiting House)
- Title: "Age Attestation on Computing Devices"
- Key provisions mirror CA AB-1043: OS providers must implement age bracket signal API, developers must request signals, penalties $2,500-$7,500 per affected minor.
- Effective date: August 12, 2026 if enacted without safety clause.
Sources: leg.colorado.gov/bills/SB26-051 Recorded: 2026-03-12 01:34:40
ATEP/Meta PAC update: Meta launched TWO super PACs totaling $65M:
- American Technology Excellence Project (ATEP): $45M from Meta (late Sept 2025)
- Run by Republican veteran Brian Baker and Democratic firm Hilltop Public Solutions
- Spent $329,000 in 2025 on polling, consulting, and legal
- Focus: electing tech-friendly state politicians from both parties
- META California (Mobilizing Economic Transformation Across California): $20M
- Focus: California state-level candidates favoring lighter tech regulation Strategic goal: counter state AI regulation bills. The bipartisan structure (Baker + Hilltop) is designed to support candidates who oppose burdensome tech regulation in either party. Note: "American Excellence PAC" (FEC C00832501) is a DIFFERENT entity — a Leadership PAC with ~$500K, NOT the $45M ATEP.
Sources: Axios (09/23/2025), TechCrunch, Politico, FEC.gov Recorded: 2026-03-12 01:34:40
Meta lobbying position pattern analysis (CO SOS data, 117 records, 22 bills): CRITICAL PATTERN: On child safety bills, Meta consistently takes an "Amending" position (actively seeking changes) on bills regulating SOCIAL MEDIA platforms: HB25-1287 (Social Media Tools for Minor Users), SB25-086 (Protections for Users of Social Media), HB24-1136 (Healthier Social Media Use by Youth), SB24-158 (Social Media Protect Juveniles). EXCEPTION: SB26-051 (Age Attestation on Computing Devices) is the ONLY child safety bill where Meta is "Monitoring" only — passive observation with 4 lobbyists deployed but no amendment efforts. This is consistent with tacit support: Meta benefits from the bill passing as-is because Horizon OS has 83.3% compliance while Linux has 13.9%. Meta actively fights bills regulating its OWN platforms but passively observes a bill that burdens its COMPETITORS. Of 22 bills lobbied, 9 are monitoring-only, 5 are amending-only, and 5 escalated from monitoring to amending. SB26-051 fits the monitoring-only pattern alongside non-controversial bills like sales tax refunds and graduation items.
Sources: CO SOS lobbying database, co_sos_meta_lobbying.csv Recorded: 2026-03-12 01:32:33
AB-1043 full text analysis — key provisions impacting Linux/FOSS:
- §1798.500(g): "Operating system provider" defined as "a person or entity that develops, licenses, or controls the operating system software on a computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device" — this explicitly includes desktop/laptop computers, not just mobile.
- §1798.501(a): Operating system providers MUST provide (a) accessible interface at account setup for birth date/age entry, (b) real-time API providing age bracket signals (under 13, 13-16, 16-18, 18+).
- §1798.504(f): Exemptions only cover broadband ISPs, telecom services, physical products. NO exemption for open-source, community-developed, or volunteer-maintained operating systems.
- §1798.503(a): Penalties up to ,500/child (negligent) or ,500/child (intentional), enforced by CA Attorney General.
- §1798.505: Operative January 1, 2027 — 10 months from now.
- The bill requires an ACCOUNT SYSTEM with age data — Linux distros have no equivalent. Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu install processes do not collect birth dates.
- §1798.500(e): "Covered application store" includes any publicly available platform that distributes applications — potentially covers apt, dnf, flatpak, snap repositories.
Sources: CA AB-1043 full text (Chapter 675, approved Oct 13, 2025) Recorded: 2026-03-12 01:26:28
Meta client name fragmentation analysis: 6 distinct client name variants across CO and LA lobbying records. Headwaters Strategies team (Burkhart, Coyne, Eichberg, Schmidt) registers under "Meta Platforms, Inc" (no period). In-house lobbyists (Diers, Martinez, Sachs) use "Meta Platforms, Inc." (with period). Two lobbyists (Martinez, Sachs) maintain separate legacy "Facebook Inc." registrations. LA lobbyists use "Meta Platforms, Inc." except Borill ("Meta Platforms, INC.") and Harbison ("Meta Platforms, Inc. (META)"). DCA lobbyist Koch is separately registered under "Digital Childhood Alliance, Inc." — not under Meta.
Sources: CO SOS lobbying database, LA Ethics Commission Recorded: 2026-03-12 01:10:48
Headwaters Strategies OSINT: The firm is owned by Will Coyne and Adam Eichberg, who are the same individuals listed as individual lobbyists (COYNE, WILLIAM C and EICHBERG, ADAM) in Meta CO lobbying records. Staff Alyson Schmidt and Amber Burkhart are also registered individually. The "4 lobbyists + 1 firm" pattern in the data is actually 4 people and their firm — not 5 separate entities.
Sources: https://headwatersstrategies.com/our-team/; https://data.colorado.gov/Legislative/Professional-Lobbyist-Clients-in-Colorado/vp65-spyn Recorded: 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z
Headwaters Strategies OSINT: Adam Eichberg (co-founder, Meta lobbyist) serves as Chair of the Board of the New Venture Fund, part of the Arabella Advisors dark money network. He was also a founding board member of the Windward Fund and is incoming board chair of Sunflower Services (which acquired Arabella Advisors in late 2025). This places Meta's principal Colorado lobbyist at the center of one of the largest dark money pass-through infrastructures in US politics.
Sources: https://newventurefund.org/who-we-are/board-of-directors/adam-eichberg-chair-of-the-board/; https://www.influencewatch.org/person/adam-eichberg/ Recorded: 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z
Headwaters Strategies OSINT: The Center for Secure and Modern Elections (CSME), a project of the New Venture Fund, is also a Headwaters Strategies lobbying client. This means Eichberg's firm lobbies for an organization housed within a network he chairs — a notable governance overlap.
Sources: https://www.influencewatch.org/person/adam-eichberg/; https://headwatersstrategies.com/our-clients/ Recorded: 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z
Headwaters Strategies OSINT: Meta has been a Headwaters client since December 2019 (pre-rebrand from Facebook). The relationship has been continuously active through FY 2025-2026. Other notable clients include Airbnb, Tesla, City of Boulder ($60K/yr), Everytown for Gun Safety, Environmental Defense Fund, and Charter Communications.
Sources: https://data.colorado.gov/Legislative/Professional-Lobbyist-Clients-in-Colorado/vp65-spyn; https://headwatersstrategies.com/our-clients/ Recorded: 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z
Meta-DCA funding confirmed: Reporting from the Deseret News (Dec 2025) confirms Meta funds the Digital Childhood Alliance. Louisiana Senator Jay Morris pressed DCA Executive Director Casey Stefanski about DCA's tech company funding sources during legislative testimony. This upgrades the DCA anomaly from open question to confirmed Meta-funded advocacy.
Sources: https://www.deseret.com/opinion/2025/12/07/child-safety-bill-backed-by-meta/; https://www.thecentersquare.com/louisiana/article_e97200f8-13d0-4b1f-90a9-e9a7093d329f.html Recorded: 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z
EU open-source age verification frameworks (EUDIW, T-Scy) provide FOSS-compatible alternatives to US commercial vendors. Key advantages: open-source licensing, no per-check fees, privacy-by-design, interoperable standards. Licensing: EU=Open-source (EUPL, Apache 2.0); reference implementations freely available vs US=Proprietary SDKs; commercial licenses incompatible with GPL | Cost model: EU=No per-check fees; self-hostable infrastructure vs US=Per-check fees ($0.10-$2.00+); cloud-only SaaS | Privacy architecture: EU=Privacy-by-design; selective disclosure; user-controlled wallet vs US=Biometric data sent to vendor cloud; vendor retains data per ToS | Interoperability: EU=Standards-based (eIDAS 2.0, ISO 18013-5); cross-border interop mandated vs US=Vendor-specific APIs; no interoperability standard | FOSS compatibility: EU=Fully compatible; designed for open-source integration vs US=Incompatible; proprietary blobs, API keys, ToS restrictions | Governance: EU=EU regulatory framework; democratic oversight; public code mandate vs US=Private companies; no public accountability; vendor lock-in risk | Age verification method: EU=Verifiable credentials from trusted issuers; zero-knowledge proofs vs US=Facial estimation, document scanning, parent-verified (K-ID) | Offline capability: EU=Wallet-based verification works offline after credential issuance vs US=Requires internet for each check; no offline mode
Sources: https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet; https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/eudi-lib-jvm-siop-openid4vp-kt; https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/european-digital-identity-wallet-architecture-and-reference-framework; https://tscy.eu/; https://tscy.eu/age-verification/; https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/european-digital-identity_en; https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/eidas-regulation Recorded: 2026-03-11T12:09:07Z
Per-check age verification pricing is incompatible with FOSS: Per-check fee model — Commercial vendors charge per verification (typically $0.10-$2.00/check). FOSS distributions have no revenue stream to cover per-user fees, making integration economically impossible for volunteer-run projects.; API key requirement — Vendor SDKs require API keys tied to commercial accounts. Distributing API keys in open-source packages would expose them to abuse; not distributing them renders the integration non-functional.; Proprietary SDK licensing — Yoti, Jumio, and Veriff SDKs are proprietary and cannot be bundled in GPL-licensed distributions. Binary-only SDK blobs conflict with distro packaging policies (Debian DFSG, Fedora licensing guidelines).; Terms of service restrictions — Vendor ToS typically prohibit redistribution, reverse engineering, and modification — all activities fundamental to FOSS. Accepting vendor ToS may conflict with GPL obligations.; No offline/self-hosted option — Cloud-only verification requires internet connectivity and vendor uptime. Air-gapped or privacy-focused Linux installations cannot comply. Self-hosting is not offered or is prohibitively expensive.; Scale economics for non-commercial distros — A mid-size Linux distribution with ~1M users would face $100K-$2M/year in verification fees with no offsetting revenue. This exceeds the entire annual budget of many community distros.; Vendor lock-in and single points of failure — Legislation mandating specific commercial vendors creates single-vendor dependency. If Yoti or similar vendor exits the market, all compliant implementations break simultaneously.; Privacy and data sovereignty — Sending user biometric data to third-party commercial APIs conflicts with the privacy expectations of Linux users and the data-minimization principles of distributions like Tails or Whonix.
Sources: Analysis of vendor pricing models vs. FOSS distribution requirements Recorded: 2026-03-11T12:08:42Z
NY S8102A: status changed from '' to 'unknown'
Recorded: 2026-03-11T11:53:40Z
IL SB-2037: status changed from '' to 'unknown'
Sources: https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=2037&GESSION=104&GA=104&DocTypeID=SB&SessionID=114&LegID= Recorded: 2026-03-11T11:53:30Z
IL HB-4140: status changed from '' to 'unknown'
Sources: https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=4140&GESSION=104&GA=104&DocTypeID=HB&SessionID=114&LegID= Recorded: 2026-03-11T11:53:28Z
IL HB-3304: status changed from '' to 'unknown'
Sources: https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=3304&GESSION=104&GA=104&DocTypeID=HB&SessionID=114&LegID= Recorded: 2026-03-11T11:53:26Z
UT SB-142: status changed from 'enacted' to 'passed'
Sources: https://le.utah.gov/~2025/bills/static/SB0142.html Recorded: 2026-03-11T11:53:21Z
US app-store-accountability-act: status changed from '' to 'unknown'
Recorded: 2026-03-11T11:53:13Z
US KOSA: status changed from '' to 'unknown'
Recorded: 2026-03-11T11:53:13Z
Meta kernel repo has 287 branches and 0 tags.
Sources: https://github.com/facebookincubator/oculus-linux-kernel Recorded: 2026-03-11T11:03:46Z
Missing kernel source for firmware versions: Quest 3 v62, Quest 3 v63, Quest 3 v64, Quest 3 v65, Quest 3 v66, Quest 3 v67, Quest 3 v68, Quest 3 v69, Quest 3 v70, Quest 3 v71, Quest 3S v69, Quest 3S v70, Quest 3S v71. No matching branch or tag found in the repo.
Sources: https://github.com/facebookincubator/oculus-linux-kernel Recorded: 2026-03-11T11:03:46Z
Meta's oculus-linux-kernel repository (branch: oculus-quest-kernel-5.4) contains 0 tree entries. Found 0 notice/license file(s): none.
Sources: https://github.com/facebookincubator/oculus-linux-kernel Recorded: 2026-03-11T11:00:26Z
No third-party GPL package notices found in the kernel repo's notice/license files. The Linux kernel itself is GPL-2.0 licensed (COPYING file present), but no structured third-party NOTICE file enumerating bundled GPL components was found. This is typical for kernel repos (components are tracked via per-file SPDX headers) but means compliance verification requires per-file analysis.
Sources: https://github.com/facebookincubator/oculus-linux-kernel Recorded: 2026-03-11T11:00:26Z
Hearing transcript keyword search configured for: Meta, Facebook, DCA, Digital Childhood Alliance, Stefanski, age verification, attestation. These keywords track Meta/Facebook involvement and DCA (Digital Childhood Alliance) connections to age-verification legislation in CO and LA.
Sources: hearing_scraper configuration Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:59:12Z
AOSP Gerrit contributions from Meta (facebook.com) (facebook.com): 0 total, 0 merged, 0 open, 0 abandoned.
Sources: https://android-review.googlesource.com (owner:domain:facebook.com) Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:55:54Z
AOSP Gerrit contributions from Meta (meta.com) (meta.com): 0 total, 0 merged, 0 open, 0 abandoned.
Sources: https://android-review.googlesource.com (owner:domain:meta.com) Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:55:54Z
AOSP Gerrit contributions from Meta (oculus.com) (oculus.com): 0 total, 0 merged, 0 open, 0 abandoned.
Sources: https://android-review.googlesource.com (owner:domain:oculus.com) Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:55:54Z
AOSP Gerrit contributions from Samsung (samsung.com): 0 total, 0 merged, 0 open, 0 abandoned.
Sources: https://android-review.googlesource.com (owner:domain:samsung.com) Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:55:54Z
AOSP Gerrit contributions from Qualcomm (quicinc.com): 0 total, 0 merged, 0 open, 0 abandoned.
Sources: https://android-review.googlesource.com (owner:domain:quicinc.com) Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:55:54Z
AOSP Gerrit contributions from Google (google.com): 1 total, 0 merged, 0 open, 1 abandoned.
Sources: https://android-review.googlesource.com (owner:domain:google.com) Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:55:54Z
Meta's combined AOSP contributions across facebook.com, meta.com, and oculus.com: 0 total, 0 merged. Full comparison report: /home/theseus/rsearch/meta-linux-research/output/reports/aosp_contribution_comparison.md
Sources: https://android-review.googlesource.com Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:55:54Z
AOSP contribution comparison -- Samsung: 0, Qualcomm: 0, Google: 1, Meta (combined): 0.
Sources: https://android-review.googlesource.com Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:55:54Z
Colorado lobbying: Sachs, Dan lobbied on n/a (subject: n/a) on behalf of Facebook Inc. (position: n/a, period: n/a - n/a)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:15:01Z
Colorado lobbying: Martinez, Ana lobbied on n/a (subject: n/a) on behalf of Facebook Inc. (position: n/a, period: n/a - n/a)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:15:01Z
Colorado lobbying: Martinez, Ana lobbied on HB21-1244 (subject: Restrictions On Collection And Use Of Biometric Info) on behalf of Facebook Inc. (position: Monitoring, period: 04/16/21 - 06/30/21)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:15:01Z
Colorado lobbying: Martinez, Ana lobbied on SB21-190 (subject: Protect Personal Data Privacy) on behalf of Facebook Inc. (position: Amending, period: 03/23/21 - 06/30/21)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:15:01Z
Colorado lobbying: Sachs, Dan lobbied on SB21-190 (subject: Protect Personal Data Privacy) on behalf of Facebook Inc. (position: Amending, period: 03/23/21 - 06/30/21)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:15:01Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on n/a (subject: n/a) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: n/a, period: n/a - n/a)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on n/a (subject: n/a) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: n/a, period: n/a - n/a)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on n/a (subject: n/a) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: n/a, period: n/a - n/a)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on n/a (subject: n/a) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: n/a, period: n/a - n/a)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Sachs, Dan lobbied on n/a (subject: n/a) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (position: n/a, period: n/a - n/a)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Martinez, Ana lobbied on n/a (subject: n/a) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (position: n/a, period: n/a - n/a)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on HB26-1058 (subject: Protections for Minors Featured in Digital Content) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/09/26 - Current)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on SB26-051 (subject: Age Attestation on Computing Devices) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/12/26 - Current)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB26-1058 (subject: Protections for Minors Featured in Digital Content) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/09/26 - Current)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on SB26-051 (subject: Age Attestation on Computing Devices) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/12/26 - Current)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on HB26-1058 (subject: Protections for Minors Featured in Digital Content) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/09/26 - Current)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on SB26-051 (subject: Age Attestation on Computing Devices) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/12/26 - Current)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on HB26-1058 (subject: Protections for Minors Featured in Digital Content) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/09/26 - Current)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on SB26-051 (subject: Age Attestation on Computing Devices) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/12/26 - Current)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Diers, Tyler lobbied on n/a (subject: n/a) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (position: n/a, period: n/a - n/a)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Martinez, Ana lobbied on RULES (subject: Privacy Rules) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (position: Monitoring, period: 04/30/22 - 06/30/22)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on SB23-207 (subject: Sales And Use Tax Refund For Data Center Purchases) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 04/03/23 - 06/30/23)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on SB23-207 (subject: Sales And Use Tax Refund For Data Center Purchases) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 04/03/23 - 06/30/23)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on SB23-207 (subject: Sales And Use Tax Refund For Data Center Purchases) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 04/03/23 - 06/30/23)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on SB23-207 (subject: Sales And Use Tax Refund For Data Center Purchases) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 04/03/23 - 06/30/23)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on SB23-207 (subject: Sales And Use Tax Refund For Data Center Purchases) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 04/03/23 - 06/30/23)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on HB24-1058 (subject: Protect Privacy of Biological Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 02/26/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on HB24-1058 (subject: Protect Privacy of Biological Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/02/24 - 02/26/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on HB24-1136 (subject: Healthier Social Media Use by Youth) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 02/29/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on HB24-1136 (subject: Healthier Social Media Use by Youth) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 02/29/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on HB24-1130 (subject: Privacy of Biometric Identifiers & Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 03/14/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on HB24-1130 (subject: Privacy of Biometric Identifiers & Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 03/14/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on SB24-158 (subject: Social Media Protect Juveniles Disclosures Reports) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/15/24 - 03/25/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on HB24-1058 (subject: Protect Privacy of Biological Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/26/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on HB24-1130 (subject: Privacy of Biometric Identifiers & Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/14/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on HB24-1136 (subject: Healthier Social Media Use by Youth) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/29/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on HB24-1468 (subject: Artificial Intelligence & Biometric Technologies) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 05/07/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on SB24-205 (subject: Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 05/06/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on SB24-041 (subject: Privacy Protections for Children's Online Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on SB24-158 (subject: Social Media Protect Juveniles Disclosures Reports) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/25/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on HB24-1058 (subject: Protect Privacy of Biological Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/26/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on HB24-1130 (subject: Privacy of Biometric Identifiers & Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/14/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on HB24-1136 (subject: Healthier Social Media Use by Youth) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/29/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB24-1058 (subject: Protect Privacy of Biological Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 02/26/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on HB24-1058 (subject: Protect Privacy of Biological Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 02/26/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on HB24-1058 (subject: Protect Privacy of Biological Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 02/26/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB24-1136 (subject: Healthier Social Media Use by Youth) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 02/29/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on HB24-1136 (subject: Healthier Social Media Use by Youth) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 02/29/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB24-1130 (subject: Privacy of Biometric Identifiers & Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 03/14/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on HB24-1130 (subject: Privacy of Biometric Identifiers & Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/02/24 - 03/14/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on SB24-158 (subject: Social Media Protect Juveniles Disclosures Reports) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/15/24 - 03/25/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on SB24-158 (subject: Social Media Protect Juveniles Disclosures Reports) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/15/24 - 03/25/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on SB24-158 (subject: Social Media Protect Juveniles Disclosures Reports) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/15/24 - 03/25/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on HB24-1468 (subject: Artificial Intelligence & Biometric Technologies) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 05/06/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on SB24-205 (subject: Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 05/06/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on SB24-041 (subject: Privacy Protections for Children's Online Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on SB24-158 (subject: Social Media Protect Juveniles Disclosures Reports) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/25/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB24-1058 (subject: Protect Privacy of Biological Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/26/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB24-1070 (subject: Allowing Certain Items at School Graduation) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB24-1130 (subject: Privacy of Biometric Identifiers & Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/14/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB24-1136 (subject: Healthier Social Media Use by Youth) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/29/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB24-1468 (subject: Artificial Intelligence & Biometric Technologies) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 05/06/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on SB24-205 (subject: Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 05/06/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on SB24-041 (subject: Privacy Protections for Children's Online Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on SB24-158 (subject: Social Media Protect Juveniles Disclosures Reports) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/25/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on HB24-1058 (subject: Protect Privacy of Biological Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/26/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on HB24-1130 (subject: Privacy of Biometric Identifiers & Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/14/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on HB24-1136 (subject: Healthier Social Media Use by Youth) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/29/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on HB24-1468 (subject: Artificial Intelligence & Biometric Technologies) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 05/06/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on SB24-205 (subject: Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 05/06/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on SB24-041 (subject: Privacy Protections for Children's Online Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on SB24-158 (subject: Social Media Protect Juveniles Disclosures Reports) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/25/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Martinez, Ana lobbied on HB24-1058 (subject: Protect Privacy of Biological Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (position: Monitoring, period: 02/12/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on HB24-1136 (subject: Healthier Social Media Use by Youth) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 02/29/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on HB24-1130 (subject: Privacy of Biometric Identifiers & Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 03/14/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on SB24-158 (subject: Social Media Protect Juveniles Disclosures Reports) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/15/24 - 03/25/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Martinez, Ana lobbied on HB24-1130 (subject: Privacy of Biometric Identifiers & Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (position: Monitoring, period: 02/12/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Martinez, Ana lobbied on HB24-1136 (subject: Healthier Social Media Use by Youth) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (position: Monitoring, period: 02/12/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Martinez, Ana lobbied on SB24-085 (subject: Sales & Use Tax Rebate for Digital Asset Purchases) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (position: Monitoring, period: 02/12/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Martinez, Ana lobbied on SB24-205 (subject: Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (position: Amending, period: 04/19/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Martinez, Ana lobbied on SB24-158 (subject: Social Media Protect Juveniles Disclosures Reports) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (position: Amending, period: 03/25/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on HB24-1058 (subject: Protect Privacy of Biological Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/26/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on HB24-1130 (subject: Privacy of Biometric Identifiers & Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/14/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on HB24-1136 (subject: Healthier Social Media Use by Youth) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/29/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on HB24-1468 (subject: Artificial Intelligence & Biometric Technologies) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 05/06/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on SB24-205 (subject: Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 05/06/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on SB24-041 (subject: Privacy Protections for Children's Online Data) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 02/01/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on SB24-158 (subject: Social Media Protect Juveniles Disclosures Reports) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/25/24 - 06/30/24)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on HB25-1287 (subject: Social Media Tools for Minor Users & Parents) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/28/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on HB25-1090 (subject: Protections Against Deceptive Pricing Practices) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/10/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on SB25-070 (subject: Online Marketplaces & Third-Party Sellers) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/17/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on SB25-086 (subject: Protections for Users of Social Media) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 01/30/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB25-1287 (subject: Social Media Tools for Minor Users & Parents) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/27/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB25-1090 (subject: Protections Against Deceptive Pricing Practices) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/10/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on SB25-070 (subject: Online Marketplaces & Third-Party Sellers) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/17/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on SB25-086 (subject: Protections for Users of Social Media) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 01/30/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on HB25-1287 (subject: Social Media Tools for Minor Users & Parents) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/27/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on HB25-1090 (subject: Protections Against Deceptive Pricing Practices) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/10/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on SB25-070 (subject: Online Marketplaces & Third-Party Sellers) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/17/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on SB25-086 (subject: Protections for Users of Social Media) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 01/30/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on HB25-1287 (subject: Social Media Tools for Minor Users & Parents) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/27/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on HB25-1090 (subject: Protections Against Deceptive Pricing Practices) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/10/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on SB25-070 (subject: Online Marketplaces & Third-Party Sellers) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/17/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: EICHBERG, ADAM lobbied on SB25-086 (subject: Protections for Users of Social Media) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 01/30/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on HB25-1287 (subject: Social Media Tools for Minor Users & Parents) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 03/28/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on HB25-1090 (subject: Protections Against Deceptive Pricing Practices) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/10/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on SB25-070 (subject: Online Marketplaces & Third-Party Sellers) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 02/17/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on SB25-086 (subject: Protections for Users of Social Media) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Amending, period: 01/30/25 - 06/30/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on HB25-B1008 (subject: Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence Interactions) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 08/23/25 - 08/27/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Headwaters Strategies lobbied on SB25-B004 (subject: Increase Transparency for Algorithmic Systems) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 08/23/25 - 08/27/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on HB25-B1008 (subject: Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence Interactions) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 08/23/25 - 08/27/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Schmidt, Alyson lobbied on SB25-B004 (subject: Increase Transparency for Algorithmic Systems) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 08/23/25 - 08/27/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on HB25-B1008 (subject: Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence Interactions) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 08/23/25 - 08/27/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: COYNE, WILLIAM C lobbied on SB25-B004 (subject: Increase Transparency for Algorithmic Systems) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 08/23/25 - 08/27/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on HB25-B1008 (subject: Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence Interactions) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 08/23/25 - 08/27/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
Colorado lobbying: Burkhart, Amber Janelle lobbied on SB25-B004 (subject: Increase Transparency for Algorithmic Systems) on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc (position: Monitoring, period: 08/23/25 - 08/27/25)
Sources: https://www.sos.state.co.us/lobby/SearchPrincipal.do Recorded: 2026-03-11T10:14:58Z
PAC tracker collected 8 records totaling $0.00 from sources: FEC, TRACER.
Sources: FEC, TRACER Recorded: 2026-03-11T09:08:03Z
RDAP lookup for digitalchildhoodalliance.org: registrant=redacted, created=2024-12-18T04:11:13.629Z, nameservers=['leia.ns.cloudflare.com', 'mitch.ns.cloudflare.com']
Sources: https://rdap.org/domain/digitalchildhoodalliance.org Recorded: 2026-03-11T08:23:41Z
EU age verification blueprint: The EU approach centres on the EUDIW (EU Digital Identity Wallet) under eIDAS 2.0, providing government-issued verifiable credentials with selective disclosure for age verification. Found 0 related GitHub repos. T-Scy consortium search returned 4 results. Key difference from US approach: wallet-based, user-controlled, interoperable across platforms and OS vendors.
Sources: GitHub API, EC EUDIW documentation Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:51:34Z
EU vs US age verification comparison: EU uses platform-level regulation (DSA/VLOPs) with FOSS exemptions and privacy-by-design (EUDIW). US uses OS-level mandates (AB 1043, SB 26-051) with no FOSS exemption, concentrating power in Apple/Google. Key risk: US approach threatens open-source OS distributions and creates vendor lock-in absent from the EU model.
Sources: EUR-Lex (DSA), CA AB 1043, CO SB 26-051 Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:51:34Z
FOSS exemption analysis: EU provides 5 distinct protection mechanisms for FOSS. US model creates 4 categories of threat affecting 13+ named projects/channels. 4 technical barriers exist with no current FOSS workaround. The EU EUDIW (open-source) provides a compliance pathway for FOSS; the US offers none.
Sources: DSA Recital 13, AB 1043 text, SB 26-051 text, EUDIW GitHub Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:51:34Z
EU DSA age verification analysis: Age verification obligations under the DSA apply primarily to VLOPs (>= 45M monthly EU users) through Articles 34-35 risk assessment and mitigation requirements. Smaller platforms face graduated obligations. FOSS projects that do not act as intermediary services are outside DSA scope entirely (Recital 13). Micro/small enterprises receive additional exemptions from transparency and reporting requirements.
Sources: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R2065 Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:51:22Z
Patent US20210286628A1: "Operating System With A Single Kernel Stack Per Processor" Status: abandoned. Filed: 2021-05-04. Claims: 38. Horizon OS relevance: low (2 keyword matches).
Sources: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20210286628A1/en Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:47:32Z
Patent US11119931B1: "Data pipeline for microkernel operating system" Status: expired. Filed: 2019-09-18. Claims: 85. Horizon OS relevance: medium (3 keyword matches).
Sources: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11119931B1/en Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:47:32Z
Meta holds Platinum membership at the Linux Foundation at $500,000/yr. This grants Meta a guaranteed board seat, TSC voting rights, and marketing council seat. Platinum members have direct governance influence over LF project selection, funding, and strategic direction.
Sources: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/members, https://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/board-members Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:46:44Z
Kathy Kam, Director of Open Source at Meta, serves as Meta's Platinum member representative on the Linux Foundation Board of Directors. This gives Meta direct influence on LF governance including project selection, budget allocation, and policy decisions.
Sources: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/about/board-members, https://www.linkedin.com/in/kathykam/ Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:46:44Z
Meta is involved in 8 LF-affiliated projects. Meta founded or created 4 of these: PyTorch Foundation, Open Compute Project (OCP), Presto Foundation, GraphQL Foundation. This pattern of donating company-created projects to LF while retaining governance influence extends Meta's reach within the open-source ecosystem.
Sources: https://pytorch.org/foundation, https://www.opencompute.org/, https://prestodb.io/, https://graphql.org/foundation/ Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:46:44Z
OpenXR extension audit: 265 total extensions found. Meta authored 76 (28.7% of total, 40.4% of vendor-specific). XR_FB_: 41, XR_META_: 35.
Sources: https://registry.khronos.org/OpenXR/specs/1.1/man/html/, https://api.github.com/repos/KhronosGroup/OpenXR-Docs/contents/specification/sources/chapters/extensions Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:44:04Z
Licensing pattern identified: 'Restrict-then-Open Cycle'. Meta repeatedly introduces restrictive licensing, faces community backlash, then relicenses to standard open-source terms. This was seen with React (BSD+Patents -> MIT) and may be playing out with Llama (custom license -> potential future change). Evidence: 5 events. Confidence: high.
Sources: Meta engineering blog, OSI, Apache Foundation, news reporting Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z
Licensing pattern identified: 'Open-Source as Marketing Strategy'. Meta uses 'open' branding for releases that do not meet OSI's Open Source Definition. This creates adoption through perceived openness while retaining commercial control. Llama 2/3 are marketed as 'open' despite having commercial use restrictions. Evidence: 4 events. Confidence: high.
Sources: Meta engineering blog, OSI, Apache Foundation, news reporting Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z
Documented 9 licensing events spanning 2014-10-28 to 2025-01-01. Identified 4 strategic patterns in Meta's open-source licensing behaviour: Restrict-then-Open Cycle, Open-Source as Marketing Strategy, Licensing as Competitive Moat, Escalating Restrictions Over Time.
Sources: multiple public sources, see timeline Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z
Meta employees hold 0 of 0 BPF maintainer/reviewer positions (0.0%). BPF-related subsystem sections: 0.
Sources: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/MAINTAINERS Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:38:59Z
Alexei Starovoitov: BPF co-maintainer and original author. Co-created eBPF (extended BPF) while at PLUMgrid, then joined Facebook/Meta. Serves as BPF subsystem co-maintainer alongside Daniel Borkmann. Controls the direction of BPF development.
Sources: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/MAINTAINERS Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:38:59Z
Andrii Nakryiko: BPF libraries maintainer, libbpf author. Primary author and maintainer of libbpf, the canonical BPF user-space library. Designed BPF CO-RE (Compile Once, Run Everywhere) architecture. Key architect of BPF tooling ecosystem.
Sources: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/MAINTAINERS Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:38:59Z
Martin KaFai Lau: BPF networking maintainer. Maintains BPF networking components. Contributed BPF socket storage, cgroup BPF, and other networking-specific BPF features used extensively in Meta's infrastructure.
Sources: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/MAINTAINERS Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:38:59Z
Song Liu: BPF contributor, live patching. Contributed BPF trampoline and live-patching support. Works on BPF performance features used in Meta's fleet.
Sources: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/MAINTAINERS Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:38:59Z
Yonghong Song: BPF compiler/BTF contributor. Key contributor to BTF (BPF Type Format) and BPF CO-RE compiler support in LLVM/Clang. Enables the 'compile once' paradigm that is central to Meta's BPF deployment strategy.
Sources: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/MAINTAINERS Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:38:59Z
Meta employees hold 0 maintainer and 0 reviewer positions across 0 kernel subsystems (kernel mainline HEAD). 0 unique individuals identified.
Sources: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/plain/MAINTAINERS Recorded: 2026-03-11T07:37:53Z
Horizon OS has 5 built-in compliance features: Meta Account Age Verification; Get Age Category API; Family Center; Quest Store Age Ratings; Minor Account Defaults. These collectively address age verification, parental consent, content controls, parental tools, and default protections for minors.
Sources: https://developer.meta.com/horizon/documentation/native/native-age-api/, https://familycenter.meta.com/ Recorded: 2026-03-11T06:12:02Z
Linux distros have 7 major compliance gaps: Account System Age Bracket; Age Category D-Bus API; Parent-Child Account Linking; Parental Consent Verification; Package Manager Age-Rating Enforcement; Unified Parental Controls Dashboard; Age-Gated Default Profiles. Estimated total implementation effort: 36-71 months of coordinated cross-project work.
Sources: Analysis based on freedesktop.org, GNOME, KDE project documentation Recorded: 2026-03-11T06:12:02Z
| Date | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | Standards Audit | OpenXR extension audit completed: Meta has 76 of 265 extensions (28.7% of total) |
| 2026-03-11 | Bill Status Change | US app-store-accountability-act: status changed from '' to 'unknown' |
| 2026-03-11 | Bill Status Change | US KOSA: status changed from '' to 'unknown' |
| 2026-03-11 | Bill Status Change | UT SB-142: status changed from 'enacted' to 'passed' |
| 2026-03-11 | Bill Status Change | IL HB-3304: status changed from '' to 'unknown' |
| 2026-03-11 | Bill Status Change | IL HB-4140: status changed from '' to 'unknown' |
| 2026-03-11 | Bill Status Change | IL SB-2037: status changed from '' to 'unknown' |
| 2026-03-11 | Bill Status Change | NY S8102A: status changed from '' to 'unknown' |
| 2026-03-11 | Osint Investigation | Headwaters Strategies OSINT completed: Adam Eichberg identified as Chair of New Venture Fund (Ara... |
| 2026-03-09 | News Mention | [Phoronix] There's Hope That At Least Colorado's Age Attestation Bill Could Exclude Open-Source |
| 2026-03-03 | Legislation | CO SB26-051 passes Senate 28-7 |
| 2026-01-27 | Legislation | CO SB26-051 (Age Attestation on Computing Devices) introduced |
| 2025-12-07 | Media Report | Deseret News reports Meta funds the Digital Childhood Alliance. Senator Jay Morris presses DCA on... |
| 2025-10-13 | Legislation | CA AB-1043 signed by Governor, effective Jan 1, 2027 |
| 2025-09-23 | Pac | Meta launches ATEP (5M) and META California (0M) super PACs to fight state AI regulation and supp... |
| 2025-06-30 | Legislation | LA HB-570 (App Store Accountability Act) signed by Governor Landry, effective July 1, 2026 |
| 2025-02-25 | Organization | Digital Childhood Alliance publicly launches with 50+ member organizations |
| 2025-01-01 | Strategic Analysis | Industry discussion: potential closed-weights pivot: Industry analysts and open-source advocates ... |
| 2024-07-23 | Licensing Decision | Llama 3.1 release maintains restrictive license: Meta releases Llama 3.1 (405B, 70B, 8B) under th... |
| 2024-04-18 | Licensing Decision | Meta releases Llama 3 with updated custom license: Meta releases Llama 3 under an updated communi... |
| 2024 | Personnel Move | Josef Bacik: Meta -> Anthropic (Btrfs maintainer) |
| 2023-07-18 | Licensing Decision | Meta releases Llama 2 with custom 'open' license: Meta releases Llama 2 under a custom license th... |
| 2023 | Personnel Move | Roman Gushchin: Meta -> Google (cgroups/memory contributor) |
| 2023 | Personnel Move | Kirill Shutemov: Intel -> Meta (memory management developer) |
| 2022-09-12 | Governance | Meta donates PyTorch to the Linux Foundation, establishing the PyTorch Foundation as an LF projec... |
| 2021-05-04 | Patent Filing | Patent US20210286628A1: Operating System With A Single Kernel Stack Per Processor (abandoned) |
| 2019-12-09 | Lobbying Registration | Meta (then Facebook) becomes Headwaters Strategies client in Colorado. Will Coyne registered as l... |
| 2019-11-06 | Governance | GraphQL Foundation established under the Linux Foundation, stewarding the Meta-created GraphQL sp... |
| 2019-09-18 | Patent Filing | Patent US11119931B1: Data pipeline for microkernel operating system (expired) |
| 2019-03-13 | Governance | Presto Foundation established under the Linux Foundation with Meta (Facebook) as founding member. |
| 2019-03-01 | Licensing Decision | Facebook releases PyTorch under modified BSD license: PyTorch is released under a standard BSD-3-... |
| 2017-09-22 | Licensing Change | Facebook relicenses React to MIT: After sustained community backlash and the WordPress departure,... |
| 2017-07-16 | Licensing Controversy | WordPress announces move away from React: WordPress co-founder Matt Mullenweg announces that Word... |
| 2017-04-18 | Licensing Controversy | Apache Software Foundation bans BSD+Patents license: The Apache Software Foundation adds Facebook... |
| 2014-10-28 | Licensing Decision | Facebook introduces BSD+Patents license for React: Facebook releases React under a BSD license wi... |
| ID | Title | URL | Accessed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | Kernel git log signoff analysis (v6.10..v6.11, v6.11..v6.... | link | 2026-03-11T23:24:46Z |
| 86 | Headwaters Strategies - Our Team | link | 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z |
| 87 | Headwaters Strategies - Our Clients | link | 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z |
| 88 | New Venture Fund - Adam Eichberg Board Bio | link | 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z |
| 89 | Adam Eichberg - InfluenceWatch | link | 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z |
| 90 | Headwaters Strategies - OpenSecrets | link | 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z |
| 91 | CO Open Data - Professional Lobbyist Clients | link | 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z |
| 92 | Deseret News - Meta funds DCA | link | 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z |
| 93 | Center Square - Senator presses DCA on tech ties | link | 2026-03-11T15:14:22Z |
| 79 | EU age verification research: https://github.com/eu-digit... | link | 2026-03-11T12:09:07Z |
| 80 | EU age verification research: https://github.com/eu-digit... | link | 2026-03-11T12:09:07Z |
| 81 | EU age verification research: https://digital-strategy.ec... | link | 2026-03-11T12:09:07Z |
| 82 | EU age verification research: https://tscy.eu/ | link | 2026-03-11T12:09:07Z |
| 83 | EU age verification research: https://tscy.eu/age-verific... | link | 2026-03-11T12:09:07Z |
| 84 | EU age verification research: https://commission.europa.e... | link | 2026-03-11T12:09:07Z |
| 85 | EU age verification research: https://digital-strategy.ec... | link | 2026-03-11T12:09:07Z |
| 77 | Pricing: Jumio | link | 2026-03-11T12:08:42Z |
| 78 | Pricing: Veriff | link | 2026-03-11T12:08:42Z |
| 76 | DCA linkedin profile | link | 2026-03-11T11:54:05Z |
| 75 | DCA twitter profile | link | 2026-03-11T11:54:02Z |
| 74 | DCA twitter profile | link | 2026-03-11T11:54:00Z |
| 73 | DCA twitter profile | link | 2026-03-11T11:53:57Z |
| 72 | DCA twitter profile | link | 2026-03-11T11:53:55Z |
| 70 | Bill status: IL SB-2037 | link | 2026-03-11T11:53:30Z |
| 71 | LA bill page: HB-570 | link | 2026-03-11T11:53:30Z |
| 68 | CO bill page: SB26-051 | link | 2026-03-11T11:53:28Z |
| 69 | Bill status: IL HB-4140 | link | 2026-03-11T11:53:28Z |
| 67 | Bill status: IL HB-3304 | link | 2026-03-11T11:53:26Z |
| 66 | Bill status: UT SB-142 | link | 2026-03-11T11:53:21Z |
| 65 | Lobbying search results for DCA in CA | link | 2026-03-11T11:48:35Z |
| 64 | Lobbying search results for DCA in LA | link | 2026-03-11T11:46:44Z |
| 63 | RDAP data for digitalchildhoodalliance.org | link | 2026-03-11T11:46:34Z |
| 62 | DCA Wayback Machine snapshot (20251022142057) | link | 2026-03-11T11:46:24Z |
| 60 | EUDIW reference page: https://github.com/eu-digital-ident... | link | 2026-03-11T11:38:42Z |
| 61 | EUDIW reference page: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-buildi... | link | 2026-03-11T11:38:42Z |
| 59 | Lobbying search results for DCA in CA | link | 2026-03-11T11:37:52Z |
| 58 | Lobbying search results for DCA in LA | link | 2026-03-11T11:36:02Z |
| 57 | RDAP data for digitalchildhoodalliance.org | link | 2026-03-11T11:35:51Z |
| 56 | DCA Wayback Machine snapshot (20251022142057) | link | 2026-03-11T11:35:40Z |
| 55 | Kernel git log signoff analysis (v6.10..v6.11, v6.11..v6.... | link | 2026-03-11T11:35:25Z |
| 54 | Kernel git log signoff analysis (v6.10..v6.11, v6.11..v6.... | link | 2026-03-11T11:24:47Z |
| 53 | Meta / Oculus Linux Kernel (GitHub) | link | 2026-03-11T11:03:46Z |
| 52 | Kernel git log signoff analysis (v6.10..v6.11, v6.11..v6.... | link | 2026-03-11T11:01:24Z |
| 51 | Meta / Oculus Linux Kernel GPL audit (branch: oculus-ques... | link | 2026-03-11T11:00:26Z |
| 50 | LA HB570 — Bill Info (25RS) | link | 2026-03-11T10:59:10Z |
| 49 | Meta Family Center: parental-supervision | link | 2026-03-11T10:57:59Z |
| 47 | Meta Family Center: family-center | link | 2026-03-11T10:57:38Z |
| 48 | Meta Family Center: family-center | link | 2026-03-11T10:57:38Z |
| 46 | AOSP Gerrit Code Review | link | 2026-03-11T10:55:54Z |
| 45 | Colorado Secretary of State - Lobbyist Search | link | 2026-03-11T10:15:09Z |
| 44 | Louisiana Board of Ethics - Lobbyist Data | link | 2026-03-11T10:08:43Z |
| 43 | Texas Ethics Commission - Lobby Search | link | 2026-03-11T08:27:58Z |
| 42 | Lobbying search results for DCA in LA | link | 2026-03-11T08:23:52Z |
| 41 | RDAP data for digitalchildhoodalliance.org | link | 2026-03-11T08:23:41Z |
| 40 | Meta Family Center: parental-supervision | link | 2026-03-11T07:56:32Z |
| 38 | Meta Family Center: family-center | link | 2026-03-11T07:56:10Z |
| 39 | Meta Family Center: family-center | link | 2026-03-11T07:56:10Z |
| 37 | Meta Family Center: parental-supervision | link | 2026-03-11T07:54:16Z |
| 36 | Meta Family Center: family-center | link | 2026-03-11T07:53:53Z |
| 35 | EUDIW reference page: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-buildi... | link | 2026-03-11T07:51:27Z |
| 34 | EUDIW reference page: https://github.com/eu-digital-ident... | link | 2026-03-11T07:51:25Z |
| 33 | There's Hope That At Least Colorado's Age Attestation Bil... | link | 2026-03-11T07:48:58Z |
| 30 | Public source: LWN.net | link | 2026-03-11T07:48:39Z |
| 31 | Public source: Phoronix | link | 2026-03-11T07:48:39Z |
| 32 | Public source: LKML (lore.kernel.org) | link | 2026-03-11T07:48:39Z |
| 28 | Patent US20210286628A1: Operating System With A Single Ke... | link | 2026-03-11T07:47:32Z |
| 29 | Patent US11119931B1: Data pipeline for microkernel operat... | link | 2026-03-11T07:47:32Z |
| 26 | Linux Foundation Board of Directors | link | 2026-03-11T07:46:44Z |
| 27 | Linux Foundation Members | link | 2026-03-11T07:46:44Z |
| 24 | Khronos OpenXR Extension Registry | link | 2026-03-11T07:44:04Z |
| 25 | OpenXR-Docs GitHub Extension Listing | link | 2026-03-11T07:44:04Z |
| 10 | Apache Software Foundation -- Resolved License Questions | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 11 | LEGAL-303: Facebook BSD+Patents classification | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 12 | Matt Mullenweg -- On React and WordPress | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 13 | Facebook Engineering -- Relicensing React, Jest, Flow, an... | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 14 | React relicense commit (GitHub) | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 15 | PyTorch LICENSE file (GitHub) | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 16 | Meta Llama 2 Community License Agreement | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 17 | OSI Blog -- Meta's Llama 2 license is not open source | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 18 | The Verge -- Meta releases Llama 2 | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 19 | Meta Llama 3 Community License Agreement | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 20 | Meta AI Blog -- Introducing Meta Llama 3 | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 21 | Meta AI Blog -- Llama 3.1 | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 22 | OSI -- Meta's Llama 3.1 and the Open Source Definition | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 23 | SemiAnalysis -- Industry analysis on Meta AI strategy | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:30Z |
| 9 | React PATENTS file (original) | link | 2026-03-11T07:40:29Z |
| 7 | Linux MAINTAINERS (BPF sections) | link | 2026-03-11T07:38:59Z |
| 8 | libbpf GitHub repository | link | 2026-03-11T07:38:59Z |
| 2 | Meta kernel source repo | link | 2026-03-11T07:38:31Z |
| 3 | Samsung kernel source repo | link | 2026-03-11T07:38:31Z |
| 4 | Xiaomi kernel source repo | link | 2026-03-11T07:38:31Z |
| 5 | OnePlus kernel source repo | link | 2026-03-11T07:38:31Z |
| 6 | Google Pixel kernel source repo | link | 2026-03-11T07:38:31Z |
| 1 | Linux kernel MAINTAINERS file (mainline HEAD) | link | 2026-03-11T07:37:53Z |
Document generated: 2026-03-12 03:15 UTC
Next scheduled update: 2026-03-19