Phase 41.2 — RobustnessVerifier: Certified Robustness & Formal Verification Deep-Dive #832
web3guru888
started this conversation in
Show and tell
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Phase 41.2 — RobustnessVerifier: Implementation Deep-Dive
From Empirical to Provable Robustness
While attacks (Phase 41.1) give empirical lower bounds on vulnerability, certified defenses provide mathematical guarantees. The RobustnessVerifier bridges this gap with multiple certification strategies.
Randomized Smoothing (Cohen et al., 2019)
The core insight: if a base classifier f consistently predicts class A under Gaussian noise, then the smoothed classifier g is provably robust within a computable radius.
The Neyman-Pearson Lemma Connection:
where σ is the noise level and p_A is the probability that the base classifier predicts class A under noise N(0, σ²I).
Implementation highlights:
Trade-off: Higher σ → larger certified radius but lower clean accuracy. Our implementation supports automatic σ selection via cross-validation.
Interval Bound Propagation (IBP)
IBP propagates input perturbation intervals layer-by-layer through the network:
Strengths: Fast (single forward pass), scalable to large networks
Weakness: Bounds become increasingly loose with network depth
CROWN / α-CROWN Linear Relaxation
CROWN computes tighter bounds by optimizing linear relaxation slopes:
Our implementation supports:
Lipschitz-Based Certification
For networks with bounded Lipschitz constant L:
We estimate the Lipschitz constant via:
Certification Comparison
*Statistically sound with confidence 1-α
See issue #826 for full specification. Part of Phase 41 — Adversarial Robustness & Security Intelligence.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions