Skip to content

FileLockMutex: fix API, prevent silent success in withLocalMutex when locking failed#2344

Merged
neko-kai merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
feature/file-lock-mutex-with-with-local-mutex
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

FileLockMutex: fix API, prevent silent success in withLocalMutex when locking failed#2344
neko-kai merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
feature/file-lock-mutex-with-with-local-mutex

Conversation

@neko-kai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@neko-kai neko-kai commented Apr 8, 2026

No description provided.

@neko-kai neko-kai requested a review from Caparow April 8, 2026 00:29
@neko-kai neko-kai requested a review from pshirshov as a code owner April 8, 2026 00:29
@neko-kai neko-kai enabled auto-merge (squash) April 8, 2026 00:29
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 67.21%. Comparing base (b747cec) to head (6be843e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2344      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    67.25%   67.21%   -0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          636      636              
  Lines        12637    12639       +2     
  Branches      1551     1431     -120     
===========================================
- Hits          8498     8494       -4     
- Misses        4139     4145       +6     
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@neko-kai neko-kai merged commit e742811 into develop Apr 8, 2026
86 of 88 checks passed
@neko-kai neko-kai deleted the feature/file-lock-mutex-with-with-local-mutex branch April 8, 2026 02:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant