80 cice5+nc compress

[anton-seaice]

Demo for ACCESS-NRI/cice5#57

[anton-seaice]

!test repro

[github-actions]

❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌

When comparing:

• 80-cice5+nc_compress (checksums created using commit 11a12e6), against
• 80-202504-dev-preindustrial+concentrations+cice5 (checksums in commit 32923a0)

Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-esm1.6-configs/11a12e63739c92dd085e2724bb151bfed15d7d9b, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/runs/45891832998.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/actions/runs/16255705330/artifacts/3523023999.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/tree/32923a0ae70806704cc2382e26f4172bb79550bc/testing/checksum

[anton-seaice]

!test repro

[github-actions]

✅ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Succeeded ✅

When comparing:

• 80-cice5+nc_compress (checksums created using commit 181e207), against
• 80-202504-dev-preindustrial+concentrations+cice5 (checksums in commit 32923a0)

Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-esm1.6-configs/181e207b465f087f73995e08b1b7c4ee648eba3f, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/runs/45892628511.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/actions/runs/16256013303/artifacts/3523102496.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/tree/32923a0ae70806704cc2382e26f4172bb79550bc/testing/checksum

[anton-seaice]

!test repro

[github-actions]

✅ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Succeeded ✅

When comparing:

• 80-cice5+nc_compress (checksums created using commit 26e1248), against
• 80-202504-dev-preindustrial+concentrations+cice5 (checksums in commit 32923a0)

Further information

The experiment can be found on Gadi at /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-esm1.6-configs/26e1248e952e148ac42a2987f3cf3ed421f834da, and the test results at https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/runs/45892815018.

The checksums generated by this !test command are found in the testing/checksum directory of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/actions/runs/16256105722/artifacts/3523120599.

The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/tree/32923a0ae70806704cc2382e26f4172bb79550bc/testing/checksum

[anton-seaice]

First failure might have been a transient file system thing ??

[blimlim]

The error log /scratch/tm70/repro-ci/experiments/access-esm1.6-configs/11a12e63739c92dd085e2724bb151bfed15d7d9b/control/exp_default_runtime/access-esm1.6.err has:

 ice: error reading coupling namelist in "input_ice.nml"

Which is a bit confusing. The stdout file has

CICE: input_ice.nml opened at unit =           11
 &COUPLING
 JOBNUM  =           1,
 RUNTIME =       86400,
 DT_CICE =        3600,
 DT_CPL_AI       =       21600,
 INPUTDIR        = INPUT            
                  ,                                                                               
 RESTARTDIR      = RESTART            
               ,                                                                                
 POP_ICEDIAG     = T,
 USE_OCNSLOPE    = F,
 USE_UMASK       = F,
 ICE_PRESSURE_ON = T,
 AIR_PRESSURE_ON = F,
 ICE_FWFLUX      = F,
 ROTATE_WINDS    = F,
 LIMIT_ICEMELT   = F,
 LIMIT_STFLX     = F,
 MELTLIMIT       =  -200.000000000000     ,
 USE_CORE_RUNOFF = T,
 GBM2PERICEAREA  = T,
 DO_SCALE_FLUXES = T,
 EXTREME_TEST    = F,
 IMSK_EVAP       = T,
 ICEBERG =           2,
 ICEBERG_RATE_S  =  0.500000000000000     ,
ICEBERG_RATE_N  =  0.500000000000000     ,
 ICEBERG_LH      =   1.00000000000000     ,
 ICEBERG_JE_S    =          70,
 RUNOFF_JE_S     =          45,
 ICEBERG_JS_N    =         201,
 RUNOFF_IS_N     =         222,
 RUNOFF_IE_N     =         270,
 RUNOFF_JS_N     =         230,
 RUNOFF_JE_N     =         300,
 RUNOFF_LH       = T,
 ADD_LPREC       =  5.131900000000000E-008,
 OCN_SSUV_FACTOR =   1.00000000000000     ,
 IOSTRESS_FACTOR =   1.00000000000000     ,
 CHK_A2I_FIELDS  = F,
 CHK_I2A_FIELDS  = F,
 CHK_I2O_FIELDS  = F,
 CHK_O2I_FIELDS  = F
 /

and so it looks like it read the namelist ok...

The same error came up during the long run I was doing at one point, but it's tricky as it seems pretty random

[anton-seaice]

I think you can only get to this if release_fileunit fails? which I don't understand. It worked on a rerun