Udate to 2026.04.000 deployment#678
Conversation
|
!test repro commit |
|
❌ The Bitwise Reproducibility Check Failed ❌ When comparing:
🔧 The new checksums will be committed to this PR, if they differ from what is on this branch. Further informationThe experiment can be found on Gadi at The checksums generated by this The checksums compared against are found here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/tree/a7ad7679f735de3d50c5effbfd370701307c5a47/testing/checksum Test summary: |
JhanSrbinovsky
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
better to include the restart in the config I suspect
|
Thanks @JhanSrbinovsky, I'll do the restart in a separate PR to make it a bit simpler to copy this change to the other configs |
|
!cherry-pick 2259971 into dev-preindustrial+concentrations dev-4xCO2+concentrations dev-historical+concentrations dev-1pctCO2 dev-1pctCO2-rad dev-1pctCO2-bgc dev-amip dev-historical+emissions dev-flat10 |
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 2259971 into dev-amip failed. This usually happens when cherry-picking results in a conflic or an empty commit. To manually cherry-pick the commits and open a pull request, please follow these instructions:
git checkout dev-amip
git pull
git checkout -b cherry_pick_from_pr678_into_dev-amip
git cherry-pick 225997183ccb1a247832d190683c31df72f410e4
git push --set-upstream origin cherry_pick_from_pr678_into_dev-amip
|
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 2259971 into dev-historical+concentrations was successful. The new pull request can be reviewed and approved here. |
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 2259971 into dev-4xCO2+concentrations was successful. The new pull request can be reviewed and approved here. |
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 2259971 into dev-flat10 was successful. The new pull request can be reviewed and approved here. |
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 2259971 into dev-1pctCO2-bgc was successful. The new pull request can be reviewed and approved here. |
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 2259971 into dev-historical+emissions was successful. The new pull request can be reviewed and approved here. |
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 2259971 into dev-1pctCO2 was successful. The new pull request can be reviewed and approved here. |
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 2259971 into dev-1pctCO2-rad was successful. The new pull request can be reviewed and approved here. |
|
Automatic Git cherry-picking of commit(s) 2259971 into dev-preindustrial+concentrations was successful. The new pull request can be reviewed and approved here. |
* Udate to 2026.04.000 deployment * Updated checksums as part of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/actions/runs/24377839036 --------- Co-authored-by: Spencer Wong <spencer.wong@anu.edu.au> Co-authored-by: access-bot <113399144+access-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
* Udate to 2026.04.000 deployment * Updated checksums as part of https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-esm1.6-configs/actions/runs/24377857922 --------- Co-authored-by: Spencer Wong <spencer.wong@anu.edu.au> Co-authored-by: access-bot <113399144+access-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
…ev-1pctCO2 Cherry-pick commits from #678
1. Summary:
What has changed?
This PR updates the executable to the 2026.04.000 deployment, which fixes a CO2 conservation bug in the UM.
2. Issues Addressed:
3. Dependencies (e.g. on payu, or model)
This change requires changes to (note pull request(s) where relevant):
4. Ad-hoc Testing
What ad-hoc testing was done? How are you convinced this change is correct (plots are good)?
See ad hoc testing results in https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/UM7/issues/208
5. CI Testing
!test reprohas been run6. Reproducibility
Is this reproducible with the previous commit? (If not, why not?)
!test repro commithas been run.Changes answers in emissions driven configurations due to changes in the CO2 fluxes.
7. Performance
Has the model performance (say, throughput of model-years/wall-day) changed?
Small change to flux calculation in UM code not expected to affect performance.
If yes, provide the numbers from your testing. Is the performance better or worse?
8. Manifests
Have you changed the executable, the input files and/or the restart files?
If yes, have you updated the manifests?
To update the manifests, run payu setup (in a cloned copy of your feature branch) with reproducibility tests turned off:
Then commit the newly created manifest files (under manifests/) only to the branch for this PR.
9. Documentation
Is the documentation updated?
10. Merge Strategy