There is a whole slew of problems once you add an element with id:0.
For example, if you keep performing collection.set(collection.serialize()) (which should be more or less idempotent) you get more and more elements appended to the end, all of which have the same .cid.
Moreover you can not clean up this collection as collection.set([]) is unable to remove them.
I think the problem is in this line:
if (order && ((model.isNew && model.isNew() || !model[this.mainIndex]) || !modelMap[model.cid || model[this.mainIndex]])) order.push(model);
In particular the condition !model[this.mainIndex] treats id=0 as a missing id, and subsequently schedulles the model for ordering phase.
In that phase it gets pushed at the end:
var orderedModels = order || toAdd;
for (i = 0, length = orderedModels.length; i < length; i++) {
this.models.push(orderedModels[i]);
}
It's also important that the model pushed to the order array is actually the already existing one found by get(0), which means that we push exactly the same instance at the end of this.models array, so now we have two entries with the same .cid.
This in turn means that this elements never get purged, even if one calls set([]), because of two other problems (I think there is a separate bug for that in issue tracker) - one is that there is
if (query == null) return;
in get(query) function, and for some reason the toRemove array contains undefined as values.
The second problem is that once any element with given cid is removed it is also removed from _indexes.cid. So if there are multiple such elements, once the first is removed, then subsequent are irremovable, due to:
model = models[i] = this.get(models[i]);
if (!model) continue;
in remove().
I think the two problems are related in that, once there is an element missing from the index, it is quite possible that undefined will occur in the toRemove array.
In general, I'd suggest scanning the whole code against expressions like "!x" and carefully replacing them with more semantically valid x === undefined or blah in x or whatever the programmer actually had in mind.
There is a whole slew of problems once you add an element with id:0.
For example, if you keep performing
collection.set(collection.serialize())(which should be more or less idempotent) you get more and more elements appended to the end, all of which have the same.cid.Moreover you can not clean up this collection as
collection.set([])is unable to remove them.I think the problem is in this line:
In particular the condition
!model[this.mainIndex]treats id=0 as a missing id, and subsequently schedulles the model for ordering phase.In that phase it gets pushed at the end:
It's also important that the model pushed to the
orderarray is actually the already existing one found byget(0), which means that we push exactly the same instance at the end ofthis.modelsarray, so now we have two entries with the same.cid.This in turn means that this elements never get purged, even if one calls
set([]), because of two other problems (I think there is a separate bug for that in issue tracker) - one is that there isin
get(query)function, and for some reason thetoRemovearray containsundefinedas values.The second problem is that once any element with given cid is removed it is also removed from _indexes.cid. So if there are multiple such elements, once the first is removed, then subsequent are irremovable, due to:
in
remove().I think the two problems are related in that, once there is an element missing from the index, it is quite possible that
undefinedwill occur in thetoRemovearray.In general, I'd suggest scanning the whole code against expressions like "!x" and carefully replacing them with more semantically valid
x === undefinedorblah in xor whatever the programmer actually had in mind.