-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 358
[ENG-9831] Cedar metadata record creation/deletion in share for collection submission #11710
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ihorsokhanexoft
wants to merge
9
commits into
CenterForOpenScience:feature/es2-consolidation
Choose a base branch
from
ihorsokhanexoft:feature/ENG-9831
base: feature/es2-consolidation
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+551
−50
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3634ac5
added cedar metadata record creation/deletion in share for collection…
ihorsokhanexoft f52c484
removed validate_required_metadata redefinition
ihorsokhanexoft ec8fb9f
enqueue cedar record update in share
ihorsokhanexoft 06ef868
added focus_iri to shtrove POST request
ihorsokhanexoft 52c8fed
separate cedar record identifier to avoid potential issues
ihorsokhanexoft 13ccfd3
separate cedar record serialization
ihorsokhanexoft b1630a1
added retry, moved tasks to task__update_share
ihorsokhanexoft 3561ed0
added more tests, make delete cedar record function working without c…
ihorsokhanexoft ff4876f
fixed tests
ihorsokhanexoft File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these'll be run multiple times, for each osfmap partition -- probably want them in an else block, run when
_next_partitionis None (after the last osfmap partition has been sent)also for cleanliness sake, would make sense in a separate function