When migrating REO2.4.2 to REO2.5, some unexpected behavior occurs:
additions = desired - actual results in only the new triples. So far so good.
deletions = actual - desired results in 200+ triples:
schema:color for classes. This is expected, because we manually add them in the migration.
owl:inverseOf for a few CIDOC properties. My guess is Protégé inferred these.
rdfs:comment without rdf:dataype=xsd.string attributes.
skos:notation without rdf:dataype=xsd.string attributes.
The last two are problematic. I can see how they are technically not the same triples, but I am unsure why they are not in additions, as they are in the REO2.5 graph.
When migrating REO2.4.2 to REO2.5, some unexpected behavior occurs:
additions = desired - actualresults in only the new triples. So far so good.deletions = actual - desiredresults in 200+ triples:schema:colorfor classes. This is expected, because we manually add them in the migration.owl:inverseOffor a few CIDOC properties. My guess is Protégé inferred these.rdfs:commentwithoutrdf:dataype=xsd.stringattributes.skos:notationwithoutrdf:dataype=xsd.stringattributes.The last two are problematic. I can see how they are technically not the same triples, but I am unsure why they are not in
additions, as they are in the REO2.5 graph.