Skip to content

Ajvb/support multiple pgbouncers#361

Merged
truthbk merged 3 commits intoDataDog:masterfrom
procore:ajvb/support-multiple-pgbouncers
Nov 22, 2017
Merged

Ajvb/support multiple pgbouncers#361
truthbk merged 3 commits intoDataDog:masterfrom
procore:ajvb/support-multiple-pgbouncers

Conversation

@ajvb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ajvb ajvb commented Oct 26, 2017

This adds support for an optional 'pgbouncers' parameter that works exactly like the processes parameter in the process integration.

This PR also includes specs for the pgbouncer integration.

Side note: I don't really like the parameter name pgbouncers. Would love to change it :)

AJ Bahnken added 3 commits October 26, 2017 14:19
This adds support for an optional 'pgbouncers' parameter that
works exactly like the processes parameter in the process integration.

This commit also includes specs for the pgbouncer integration.
@truthbk truthbk self-assigned this Nov 16, 2017
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@truthbk truthbk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ajvb solid stuff! Merging! Thanks for the tests 😍

@truthbk truthbk merged commit 819ae8b into DataDog:master Nov 22, 2017
@ajvb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ajvb commented Nov 27, 2017

My pleasure! :)

@truthbk truthbk added this to the 1.12.0 milestone Dec 13, 2017
cegeka-jenkins pushed a commit to cegeka/puppet-datadog_agent that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2018
* Support for multiple pgbouncers + pgbouncer spec

This adds support for an optional 'pgbouncers' parameter that
works exactly like the processes parameter in the process integration.

This commit also includes specs for the pgbouncer integration.

* Minor style/doc changes + spec updates

* Fix ruby version differences within specs
@samhanes-fs samhanes-fs deleted the ajvb/support-multiple-pgbouncers branch October 10, 2019 20:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants