Skip to content

Unchecked keyboard-interactive prompt count in `russh` client auth path

Moderate
Eugeny published GHSA-g9g7-5cgw-6v28 May 20, 2026

Package

cargo russh (Rust)

Affected versions

>= 0.37.0,<0.61.0

Patched versions

0.61.0

Description

Summary

In the russh client keyboard-interactive authentication path, a malicious SSH server could send a USERAUTH_INFO_REQUEST with an attacker-controlled prompt count, and the client would use that raw count directly in Vec::with_capacity(...) before validating that enough prompt data was actually present in the packet.

This is a client-side denial-of-service / resource-exhaustion issue on the keyboard-interactive auth path.

Details

The vulnerable code path is in:

  • russh/src/client/encrypted.rs

When the client is in CurrentRequest::KeyboardInteractive state and receives SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_INFO_REQUEST, it parses:

  1. name
  2. instructions
  3. language tag
  4. n_prompts

Before the fix, the code then did:

let n_prompts = map_err!(u32::decode(&mut r))?;
let mut prompts = Vec::with_capacity(n_prompts.try_into().unwrap_or(0));

That means a malicious server could advertise an enormous n_prompts value even if the packet contained no prompt bodies at all.

The fix rejects inconsistent prompt counts before allocating:

let n_prompts = map_err!(u32::decode(&mut r))?;
let max_prompts = r.remaining_len() / 5;
let n_prompts = n_prompts as usize;
if n_prompts > max_prompts {
    return Err(crate::Error::Inconsistent.into());
}
let mut prompts = Vec::with_capacity(n_prompts);

Each prompt needs at least 4 bytes of string length plus 1 byte of echo flag, so remaining_len() / 5 is a safe upper bound. If the declared count exceeds what the packet can actually contain, the packet is malformed and is now rejected instead of being silently truncated.

I did not find a same-class server-side bug in the reciprocal USERAUTH_INFO_RESPONSE path. The server already bounds the response count by remaining packet length before allocating.

Affected package and versions:

  • package: russh
  • earliest affected stable: 0.37.0
  • confirmed affected current release: 0.60.2

I do not believe this issue affects the other crates in this workspace (russh-config, russh-cryptovec, pageant, or russh-util).

PoC

I added an in-tree regression test:

  • client::tests::oversized_keyboard_interactive_prompt_count_is_rejected

The test builds a client session in WaitingAuthRequest(KeyboardInteractive) state, feeds it a synthetic USERAUTH_INFO_REQUEST packet with:

  • normal name
  • normal instructions
  • empty language tag
  • n_prompts = u32::MAX
  • no prompt bodies

On the fixed code, the client rejects the packet with Error::Inconsistent and does not emit a reply to the caller.

For old-code impact verification, I also checked the pre-fix path separately with a constrained-memory repro. On unfixed upstream/main, the same malformed packet attempted a very large allocation and failed with:

memory allocation of 137438953440 bytes failed

Relevant verification commands:

cargo test -p russh oversized_keyboard_interactive_prompt_count_is_rejected -- --nocapture
cargo test -p russh --lib --no-default-features --features ring oversized_keyboard_interactive_prompt_count_is_rejected -- --nocapture

Impact

Suggested CVSS v3.1:

  • CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
  • Score: 6.5

Reasoning:

  • AV:N: reached by a malicious SSH server over the network
  • AC:L: the packet format is straightforward
  • PR:N: no prior authentication required
  • UI:R: the victim must initiate a connection and proceed into keyboard-interactive auth
  • C:N, I:N: I have not demonstrated confidentiality or integrity impact
  • A:H: the server can drive a very large allocation attempt in the client auth path, which can abort or exhaust client-side resources depending on allocator and platform behavior

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVE ID

CVE-2026-48107

Weaknesses

No CWEs

Credits