In one of my working projects built on RichTextFX, I use a workflow that enables me to specify the code area language like this
CodeEditorConfiguration cfg = new XmlCodeEditorConfiguration();
CodeEditor = new CodeEditor(cfg, sampleCode);
Also, each configuration get's to specify it's style within the class (with the use of a URLStreamHandlerFactory ) thus making each configuration class more compact and self dependent. So, I'm wondering if the idea is worth a pull request or if RichTextFX would be better without it (as the above example tends to be gearing towards a code editor rather than a control that an editor can be built upon ). Additionally, I'm also considering specifying line number functionality from the editor configuration.
In one of my working projects built on RichTextFX, I use a workflow that enables me to specify the code area language like this
Also, each configuration get's to specify it's style within the class (with the use of a
URLStreamHandlerFactory) thus making each configuration class more compact and self dependent. So, I'm wondering if the idea is worth a pull request or if RichTextFX would be better without it (as the above example tends to be gearing towards a code editor rather than a control that an editor can be built upon ). Additionally, I'm also considering specifying line number functionality from the editor configuration.