What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?
To ease the downscaling group's use of NorESM atmosphere output, some new fields should be added to CAM:
- Fraction of wet days per month (
> 1 mm / day) (FRAC_WETDAYS)
- This can be collected as an
outfld call once per day (at 00:00) with a zero or a one.
- With monthly averaged output (standard
h0a), this will output correct quantity
- Monthly average of total precipitation only counting wet days (
PREC_TOT_WETDAYS)
- Keep a running total of precipitation during a day (reset at 00:00). This is also needed for
FRAC_WETDAYS
- Call
outfld with the day's total precipitation only if > 1 mm.
- I had in mind the standard deviation of the daily mean
2m surface air temperature over a season (DJF, MAM, JJA, & SON)
- CAM does not usually save seasonal fields. They are computed per
outfld call with collection frequency determined by the namelist.
- One idea is to create a special 3-month output file. This would only work if the experiment fun starts off at a season boundary (instead of a year boundary).
- Another idea is to keep track of seasons internally and call
outfld only at the season end. Only non-zero entries would be used by post-processing tools.
Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?
@brasmus
Will this change (regression test) answers?
No
Will you be implementing this enhancement yourself?
Yes
What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?
To ease the downscaling group's use of NorESM atmosphere output, some new fields should be added to CAM:
> 1 mm / day) (FRAC_WETDAYS)outfldcall once per day (at 00:00) with a zero or a one.h0a), this will output correct quantityPREC_TOT_WETDAYS)FRAC_WETDAYSoutfldwith the day's total precipitation only if> 1 mm.2msurface air temperature over a season (DJF, MAM, JJA, & SON)outfldcall with collection frequency determined by the namelist.outfldonly at the season end. Only non-zero entries would be used by post-processing tools.Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?
@brasmus
Will this change (regression test) answers?
No
Will you be implementing this enhancement yourself?
Yes