Skip to content

[IMP] apriori: l10n_it_riba -> l10n_it_riba_oca#5443

Merged
hbrunn merged 1 commit into
OCA:18.0from
PyTech-SRL:18.0-apriori-l10n_it_riba
Jan 10, 2026
Merged

[IMP] apriori: l10n_it_riba -> l10n_it_riba_oca#5443
hbrunn merged 1 commit into
OCA:18.0from
PyTech-SRL:18.0-apriori-l10n_it_riba

Conversation

@SirPyTech

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The rename happened in OCA/l10n-italy#4649.

@SirPyTech SirPyTech force-pushed the 18.0-apriori-l10n_it_riba branch from d4ae852 to 12440c8 Compare November 10, 2025 08:42
@SirPyTech

This comment was marked as resolved.

@SirPyTech

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@OCA/openupgrade-maintainers can someone have a look? Thanks!

@OCA-git-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@hbrunn

hbrunn commented Jan 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 18.0-ocabot-merge-pr-5443-by-hbrunn-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2026
Signed-off-by hbrunn
@OCA-git-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hbrunn your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 18.0-ocabot-merge-pr-5443-by-hbrunn-bump-nobump.

After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red.

@hbrunn

hbrunn commented Jan 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

see OCA/oca-github-bot#326

@hbrunn hbrunn merged commit 30666c1 into OCA:18.0 Jan 10, 2026
4 checks passed
@HekkiMelody HekkiMelody deleted the 18.0-apriori-l10n_it_riba branch April 9, 2026 09:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants