[14.0][MIG] l10n_it_fatturapa_out_triple_discount#3269
Closed
odooNextev wants to merge 53 commits into
Closed
Conversation
…API and to new file names
it fixes: - removes xs:dateTime if bogus and not mandatory i.e. 0001-01-01T00:00:00.000+02:00 where python raises OverflowError - removes timezone from xs:date to make pyxb able to compare with 1-1-1970, it also removes the need of patching pyxb - removes space only strings if not mandatory, else replace with a dash breaking change: modules needs to import binding.fatturapa instead of bindings.fatturapa_v_1_2, this would be asl useful for new specs
…e now rounded to the nearest even result instead of away from zero". See https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.0.html#builtins Examples: >>> '%.2f' % 75.845 '75.84' >>> '%.2f' % 75.855 '75.86' >>> round(2.5) 2 >>> round(3.5) 4
…scount: modifica del type di Importo in ScontoMaggiorazioneType (OCA#1875) * [IMP] l10n_it_fatturapa_out: change precision_rounding of ScontoMaggiorazioneType according to e-invoicing specs 1.6 * [IMP] l10n_it_fatturapa_out_triple_discount: change precision_rounding of ScontoMaggiorazioneType according to e-invoicing specs 1.6
…API and to new file names
it fixes: - removes xs:dateTime if bogus and not mandatory i.e. 0001-01-01T00:00:00.000+02:00 where python raises OverflowError - removes timezone from xs:date to make pyxb able to compare with 1-1-1970, it also removes the need of patching pyxb - removes space only strings if not mandatory, else replace with a dash breaking change: modules needs to import binding.fatturapa instead of bindings.fatturapa_v_1_2, this would be asl useful for new specs
…14.0-mig-l10n_it_fatturapa_out_triple_discount
54464d5 to
b954f21
Compare
Contributor
|
@odooNextev vi è chiaro come procedere su questa? |
Contributor
Author
Dobbiamo prima risolvere la issue in fatturapa_in #3274 |
Contributor
Author
|
Nel modulo l10n_it_fatturapa_in https://github.com/OCA/l10n-italy/blob/14.0/l10n_it_fatturapa_in/models/account.py#L321 processando le righe negative salta il controllo che il movimento sia "quadrato". Questo è corretto oppure va rivisto? |
added 2 commits
July 25, 2023 16:13
Contributor
|
/ocabot rebase |
Contributor
|
@sergiocorato The rebase process failed, because command |
Contributor
|
Prendendo spunto da questa PR, ne ho creato una nuova con alcuni fix e senza conflitti sul branch |
Contributor
|
@odooNextev chiudiamo questa? |
Contributor
Author
|
superseded #3681 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.