https://sssd.io/ hard to read

[garyemiller]

Light gray text on white is hard to read. Not ADA compliant. Can you please fix that so I don't have to use a special reader for your site?

[alexey-tikhonov]

@garyemiller, does https://sssdio--103.org.readthedocs.build/ look better?

[garyemiller]

My opinion will always be subjective. Best to use objective standards like the ADA.

This ADA checker says: Not Compliant:

https://www.accessibilitychecker.org/audit/?website=https%3A%2F%2Fsssdio--103.org.readthedocs.build%2F&flag=us

The @1 issue:

1 Ensures the contrast between foreground and background colors meets WCAG 2 AA minimum contrast ratio thresholds

[alexey-tikhonov]

My opinion will always be subjective. Best to use objective standards like the ADA.

This ADA checker says: Not Compliant:

https://www.accessibilitychecker.org/audit/?website=https%3A%2F%2Fsssdio--103.org.readthedocs.build%2F&flag=us

Thank you for the link.

The @1 issue:

1 Ensures the contrast between foreground and background colors meets WCAG 2 AA minimum contrast ratio thresholds

Unfortunately, vast majority of issues reported are in ReadTheDocs platforms widgets (i.e. not fixable at sssd.io) and should be reported against https://github.com/readthedocs/addons

[alexey-tikhonov]

1 Ensures the contrast between foreground and background colors meets WCAG 2 AA minimum contrast ratio thresholds

For this item specifically: if I read report correctly, both items reported are 'ea-*' - elements inserted by 'EthicalAds', i.e. advertisement.
I don't find a complain about "Start / Learn / ..." sections I changed even for original sssd.io

[garyemiller]

elements inserted by 'EthicalAds', i.e. advertisement.

Yeah, cant fix those.

I find the text that gets bolder when I mouse over it, is a tad to little contrast. But if they comply with ADA that is all I ask.

Thanks for looking at it. Now that you know, I expect you tot do better. The trend towards low contrast in the last year has been hard on me...