Skip to content

OpenMRS Module Upload Vulnerable to Path Traversal (Zip Slip)

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 4, 2026 in openmrs/openmrs-core • Updated May 8, 2026

Package

maven org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web (Maven)

Affected versions

<= 2.7.8
>= 2.8.0, <= 2.8.5

Patched versions

None

Description

Affected Versions

version ≤ 2.7.8 (latest version at time of disclosure)

https://github.com/openmrs/openmrs-core

Impact

The endpoint POST /openmrs/ws/rest/v1/module is vulnerable to a path traversal (Zip Slip) attack. An authenticated attacker can upload a crafted .omod archive containing ZIP entries with directory traversal sequences. Upon automatic extraction by the server, the incomplete path validation in WebModuleUtil.startModule() fails to prevent entries such as web/module/../../../../malicious.jsp from being written outside the intended module directory. If the traversal target falls within the web application root (e.g., /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/openmrs/), the attacker achieves arbitrary file write and subsequent Remote Code Execution.

Notably, other extraction methods in the same codebase (ModuleUtil.expandJar(), TestInstallUtil.addZippedTestModules()) are properly protected with normalize().startsWith() checks — this vulnerability is an oversight where the same fix was not applied.

Furthermore, the module.allow_web_admin runtime property, which is intended to restrict administrators from managing modules via the web interface, only gates the Legacy UI controller entry point. The REST API endpoint POST /openmrs/ws/rest/v1/module does not check this property, allowing this restriction to be fully bypassed.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Construct a malicious .omod file (which is a ZIP/JAR archive) containing a ZIP entry with a path traversal payload in its entry name, such as web/module/../../../../<target_filename>. Upload this file to POST /openmrs/ws/rest/v1/module with valid admin credentials via Basic Auth.

image

image

  1. The server parses and loads the module. During WebModuleUtil.startModule(), entries under web/module/ are automatically extracted. The existing check Paths.get(name).startsWith("..") only blocks entries beginning with .., so an entry starting with web/module/ passes the check. The ../ sequences in the remaining path cause the file to be written outside the intended WEB-INF/view/module/ directory — for example, into the web application root at /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/openmrs/.

image

  1. The traversed file is now accessible under the web application root. If the written file is a JSP script, accessing it via the browser triggers server-side execution, achieving RCE.

image

Root Cause Analysis

The vulnerability exists in WebModuleUtil.startModule() (web/src/main/java/org/openmrs/module/web/WebModuleUtil.java).

Vulnerable code:

Enumeration<JarEntry> entries = jarFile.entries();
while (entries.hasMoreElements()) {
    JarEntry entry = entries.nextElement();
    String name = entry.getName();

    // ❌ Incomplete check — only blocks entries starting with ".."
    if (Paths.get(name).startsWith("..")) {
        throw new UnsupportedOperationException("...");
    }

    if (name.startsWith("web/module/")) {
        String filepath = name.substring(11);
        StringBuilder absPath = new StringBuilder(realPath + "/WEB-INF");
        absPath.append("/view/module/");
        absPath.append(mod.getModuleIdAsPath()).append("/").append(filepath);

        // ❌ No normalize() or startsWith() boundary check before writing
        File outFile = new File(absPath.toString().replace("/", File.separator));
        outStream = new FileOutputStream(outFile, false);
        inStream = jarFile.getInputStream(entry);
        OpenmrsUtil.copyFile(inStream, outStream);
    }
}

Why the check fails: For an entry named web/module/foo/../../../../evil.jsp, Paths.get(name) starts with web, not .., so the check passes. After name.substring(11), the filepath foo/../../../../evil.jsp is concatenated directly into the output path without normalization, resulting in a write outside the intended directory.

Correctly protected code in the same codebase:

ModuleUtil.expandJar():

// ✅ Correct — uses normalize().startsWith()
if (!parent.toPath().normalize().startsWith(docBase)) {
    throw new UnsupportedOperationException("...");
}

TestInstallUtil.addZippedTestModules():

// ✅ Correct — uses normalize().startsWith()
if (!zipEntryFile.toPath().normalize().startsWith(moduleRepository.toPath().normalize())) {
    throw new IOException("Bad zip entry");
}

The fix pattern is already known and applied elsewhere in the codebase. WebModuleUtil.startModule() is an oversight.

Bypass of module.allow_web_admin

The module.allow_web_admin property only restricts module operations at the Legacy UI layer (ModuleListController). The REST API endpoint does not consult this property:

Legacy UI:  POST /admin/modules/moduleList.form → allowAdmin() check → [BLOCKED]
REST API:   POST /ws/rest/v1/module             → No allowAdmin() check → [ALLOWED]
                ↓
        ModuleFactory.loadModule()
                ↓
        WebModuleUtil.startModule()   ← Zip Slip here, no allowAdmin check
                ↓
        FileOutputStream.write()      ← Arbitrary file write

Remediation

Add normalize().startsWith() boundary validation before writing, consistent with the existing pattern in ModuleUtil.expandJar():

File outFile = new File(absPath.toString().replace("/", File.separator));

// ✅ Add this check
if (!outFile.toPath().normalize().startsWith(
        Paths.get(realPath, "WEB-INF").normalize())) {
    throw new UnsupportedOperationException(
        "Zip entry '" + name + "' would be written outside the allowed directory.");
}

Additionally, enforce the module.allow_web_admin restriction consistently across all module upload entry points, including the REST API.

References

@ibacher ibacher published to openmrs/openmrs-core May 4, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 4, 2026
Reviewed May 4, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 6, 2026
Last updated May 8, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity Low
Attack Requirements None
Privileges Required High
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability High
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality High
Integrity High
Availability High

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(31st percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-40076

GHSA ID

GHSA-78fc-9688-w8xw

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.