Skip to content

Docling: Unsafe Playwright-based HTML Rendering

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 2, 2026 in docling-project/docling • Updated Jun 3, 2026

Package

pip docling (pip)

Affected versions

>= 2.82.0, < 2.91.0

Patched versions

2.91.0

Description

Impact

In versions >= 2.82.0, < 2.91.0, if the HTML backend was explicitly configured for rendering (rendering option by default deactivated), then the Playwright-based rendering feature could allow JavaScript execution and unrestricted network access when processing untrusted HTML documents. An attacker could craft malicious HTML that executes arbitrary JavaScript in the rendering context or makes unauthorized network requests to internal services, potentially leading to SSRF attacks, data exfiltration, or remote code execution in the rendering environment.

Patches

Fixed in version 2.91.0. The rendering context now explicitly disables JavaScript execution (java_script_enabled=False) and implements network isolation controls. When enable_remote_fetch is disabled, the browser operates in offline mode, preventing all network requests.

Workarounds

Refrain from using render_page=True when processing untrusted HTML documents.

References

References

@dolfim-ibm dolfim-ibm published to docling-project/docling Jun 2, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 3, 2026
Reviewed Jun 3, 2026
Last updated Jun 3, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(37th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')

The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment. Learn more on MITRE.

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-44016

GHSA ID

GHSA-pj2v-ggqh-cmq2

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.
⚡