Skip to content

Gogs: Overwriting critical files results in a denial of service

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 3, 2026 in gogs/gogs • Updated Jun 16, 2026

Package

gomod gogs.io/gogs (Go)

Affected versions

<= 0.13.4

Patched versions

0.14.0

Description

Vulnerability type: Path Traversal
Impact: DoS
Exploitation prerequisite: authorized user
Description: As an authorized user, an intruder can dictate the value which is passed to the git diff command which, together with bypassing the filtering of the passed value, allows the user to bypass the target directory and write the result of the comparison to any arbitrary path.
Researcher: Artyom Kulakov (Positive Technologies)
Mitigation:

  1. https://github.com/gogs/gogs/blob/b7372b1f32cd0bb40984debfb049e3fc04efaee4/internal/route/repo/editor.go#L307 — on this line, instead of the treePath variable, which comes directly from the user unchanged, we should first filter and then pass the entry variable.
  2. To filter the treePath variable, it is better to use the preexisting pathutil.Clean function instead of path.Clean from the standard Go library.

Exploitation

A Positive Technologies researcher discovered that the user has the ability to preview their changes when editing a file in the repository. The POST /:user/:repo/_preview/:branch/:path_to_file method is responsible for displaying the changes. The problem is how the POST /:user/:repo/_preview/:branch/:path_to_file method processes the value passed to the :path_to_file (see Listing 1).

Listing 1. _preview method processor
func DiffPreviewPost(c *context.Context, f form.EditPreviewDiff) {
	// В treePath попадает значение из :path_to_file
	treePath := c.Repo.TreePath

    // Проверка, что файл существует в репозитории
	entry, err := c.Repo.Commit.TreeEntry(treePath)

	-cut-

	// Значение, полученное от пользователя, передается в функцию в обход фильтра
	diff, err := c.Repo.Repository.GetDiffPreview(c.Repo.BranchName, treePath, f.Content)

	-cut-

The first problem to solve is to make the TreeEntry function think that the value passed in is a file that actually exists in the repository. To do this, we must consider how the TreeEntry function actually makes this decision (see Listing 2).

Listing 2. Path checking and cleaning function
func (t *Tree) TreeEntry(subpath string, opts ...LsTreeOptions) (*TreeEntry, error) {
	
	-cut-
	// Очистка пути от “.” И “/”
	subpath = path.Clean(subpath)
	
	// Разбиение результата на компоненты для их последующей верификации в цикле
	paths := strings.Split(subpath, "/")
	
	-cut-
	
	for i, name := range paths {
		-cut-
	}

Thus, we have a two-level path verification system. At the first stage, extra characters are removed, and at the second stage the resulting path is divided into components, each of which is then checked to be present in the repository. If the TreeEntry function receives a path that has the format of ../../../../../../etc/passwd, it will be transformed into an [.., .., .., .., .., .., etc, passwd] array. The first element of this array will fail further validation and an error will be returned. This problem can be bypassed if the path is directly from the root directory and the corresponding directory hierarchy is present in the repository. A path in the format of /etc/passwd will turn into an [, etc, passwd] array and successfully pass through the filter (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Example of filter bypass

image
The resulting value will be passed unchanged to the GetDiffPreview function, which will execute the git diff /etc/passwd command in the current repository (see Listing 3).

Listing 3. Change comparison function
func (repo *Repository) GetDiffPreview(branch, treePath, content string) (diff *gitutil.Diff, err error) {
	-cut-

	cmd := exec.Command("git", "diff", treePath)
	cmd.Dir = localPath
	cmd.Stderr = os.Stderr

	-cut-
}

However, we will not get any results because such a command will exit early with an error stating that the /etc/passwd is outside the repository boundaries. Because of the specifics of the exec.Command function, there is no way to embed commands or insert spaces to separate the arguments. So, we get one controllable command parameter diff.

Then a second task arises: to select a parameter which allows us to perform malicious actions. Such a parameter is --output=<file>. This option allows the result of the comparison to be written over the passed path. The malicious command looks like this: git diff —output=/data/gogs.db. It overwrites the database file with garbage, which leads to denial of service. Instead of a database file, we could also overwrite a app.ini configuration file.

The final challenge is to bypass the filter in order to pass the payload. This is possible through the use of some peculiarities in the library function path.Clean. By entering a specific sequence of characters, the path.Clean function discards everything that came before this sequence and the sequence itself, leaving only the remains. This behavior is best demonstrated by the following table (see Table 1).

Table 1. Results of the path.Clean function operation
Input data Result
any ../../target target
any1/…/any2/../any3/../target target
./target target
/../target /target
a/b/../../../../target ../../target

So, the payload that will bypass the filters and do as we wish, will look like this: —output=/../data/gogs.db.
Attack steps:

  1. Create a data directory in the repository and an empty gogs.db file in that directory.
  2. Send a payload request and check that the code returned is a 200 OK (see Figure 2).
Figure 2. Example of a successful attack

image

References

@unknwon unknwon published to gogs/gogs Jun 3, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 16, 2026
Reviewed Jun 16, 2026
Last updated Jun 16, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(14th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-52797

GHSA ID

GHSA-pm6v-2h4w-4rp2

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.