Skip to content

@utcp/http: SSRF via attacker-controlled OpenAPI servers[0].url in HTTP communication protocol

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published May 10, 2026 in universal-tool-calling-protocol/typescript-utcp • Updated Jun 9, 2026

Package

npm @utcp/http (npm)

Affected versions

<= 1.1.1

Patched versions

1.1.2

Description

Summary

The @utcp/http package is vulnerable to a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) caused by a trust-boundary inconsistency between manual discovery and tool invocation. registerManual() validates the discovery URL against an HTTPS / loopback allowlist, but callTool() reuses the resolved toolCallTemplate.url directly without revalidating, and the OpenApiConverter blindly trusts whatever servers[0].url an attacker-hosted spec declares. An attacker who hosts a malicious OpenAPI spec on a legitimate HTTPS endpoint can declare e.g. servers: [{ url: "http://127.0.0.1:9090" }] or servers: [{ url: "http://169.254.169.254" }]; the converter then produces tools whose URL points at internal services on the agent host.

A separate prefix-bypass also affected the discovery-time check: the previous startsWith('http://localhost') guard let URLs like http://localhost.evil.com through.

Sister advisory

This is the npm/TypeScript counterpart of GHSA-39j6-4867-gg4w / CVE-2026-44661 on the Python utcp-http package. Same vulnerability, same fix shape, same reporter.

Versions and patch state

  • @utcp/http <= 1.1.1 — vulnerable. Both the loopback-redirect (http://127.0.0.1) and the non-loopback internal-IP variants (e.g. http://169.254.169.254, http://10.0.0.5) succeed. Note: the streamable_http and sse callToolStreaming paths in 1.1.1 are TODO placeholders and don't actually fetch URLs, so the runtime SSRF surface in these protocols is currently confined to discovery — a future implementation must also call ensureSecureUrl before issuing the request.
  • @utcp/http 1.1.2 — full fix. Runtime revalidation in callTool closes the non-loopback variants; the OpenApiConverter rejects, at conversion time, any spec fetched from a non-loopback source that declares a loopback servers[0].url, closing the loopback-redirect variant.

Impact

A remote attacker who can convince the agent (via the LLM context, prompt injection, or a tool-discovery surface) to register their HTTPS OpenAPI URL can:

  • Map internal networks behind the agent.
  • Read AWS/GCP IAM credentials from cloud metadata endpoints (http://169.254.169.254, http://metadata.google.internal).
  • Reach unauthenticated internal services exposed on loopback (Elasticsearch, Redis HTTP, internal admin panels, the agent's own HTTP server).
  • Have responses returned to the LLM, which combined with prompt injection enables exfiltration back to the attacker.

Patch

Commit on dev: 21f63e6.

New helper packages/http/src/_security.ts exposes isSecureUrl, isLoopbackUrl, ensureSecureUrl. Hostname-based validation closes the prefix bypass (http://localhost.evil.com → rejected). All three protocols' registerManual now call ensureSecureUrl(url, 'manual discovery'); callTool re-checks the resolved URL with ensureSecureUrl(url, 'tool invocation') immediately before the axios request. OpenApiConverter rejects remote spec → loopback server.

Workarounds

For users who cannot upgrade immediately:

  • Refuse to call registerManual with any URL controlled by an untrusted party, even over HTTPS.
  • Restrict outbound network access from the host running the agent so internal addresses (RFC1918, 169.254.0.0/16, loopback) are unreachable.

Credit

Discovered and reported by @YLChen-007 against the Python sibling implementation (universal-tool-calling-protocol/python-utcp#83). The TypeScript port shared the same code shape and the same vulnerability.

References

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database May 14, 2026
Reviewed May 14, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database May 28, 2026
Last updated Jun 9, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(9th percentile)

Weaknesses

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-45366

GHSA ID

GHSA-r8j5-8747-88cm

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.