Add back pre-commit job for mypy type-checking

[danielhollas]

Add back pre-commit CI job that runs all pre-commit hooks, including mypy, see #6831 for details.

Here are mypy failures that are currently present on main:

src/aiida/storage/sqlite_zip/utils.py:75: error: Argument 1 to "_contains" has incompatible type "str | bytes | bytearray | dict[Any, Any] | list[Any]"; expected "dict[Any, Any] | list[Any]"  [arg-type]
src/aiida/storage/sqlite_zip/utils.py:75: error: Argument 2 to "_contains" has incompatible type "str | bytes | bytearray | dict[Any, Any] | list[Any]"; expected "dict[Any, Any] | list[Any]"  [arg-type]
Found 2 errors in 1 file (checked 457 source files)

I wasn't sure how to fix them, as they seem to be false-positives so I just added type-ignores for now.

Closes #6831

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 78.44%. Comparing base (936185b) to head (ea3213e).
⚠️ Report is 56 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/aiida/orm/nodes/node.py	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6827      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.45%   78.44%   -0.00%     
==========================================
  Files         568      568              
  Lines       43092    43093       +1     
==========================================
  Hits        33802    33802              
- Misses       9290     9291       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[danielhollas]

If somebody modifies environment.yml manually, this hook should run.

[agoscinski]

Thanks for the PR, I rebased on main and fixed the new type checking error as far as possible. There is an inherent problem in the pydantic model PR #6255 that does not allow a fix of the type checks. We merged the PR as an experimental feature and I marked this as an issue in #6842. @danielhollas Could you review my changes then I merge.

[agoscinski]

Sorry for the additional changes but the version change did not work so I had to find a different solution (changing it back at the end^^). I finished now.

[danielhollas]

@agoscinski thanks for the rebase and fixes. LGTM with just one comment. Hopefully we can get rid of the type-ignores in later PRs, but for now it's I think important to get this in to prevent further type-checking problems and to unblock other type-checking PRs.