Skip to content

🧪 ci-code: unique coverage artifact per broker#7368

Open
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 1 commit into
aiidateam:mainfrom
GeigerJ2:fix/coverage-artifact-name-collision
Open

🧪 ci-code: unique coverage artifact per broker#7368
GeigerJ2 wants to merge 1 commit into
aiidateam:mainfrom
GeigerJ2:fix/coverage-artifact-name-collision

Conversation

@GeigerJ2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

The two py3.14 matrix variants (rmq, zmq) both upload an artifact named coverage, which collides under upload-artifact@v4+.

The two py3.14 matrix variants (rmq, zmq) both upload an artifact named
`coverage`, which collides under `upload-artifact@v4+`.
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 13, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.28%. Comparing base (e3aae79) to head (296dda1).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7368      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.28%   80.28%   -0.00%     
==========================================
  Files         577      577              
  Lines       45545    45545              
==========================================
- Hits        36562    36560       -2     
- Misses       8983     8985       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@GeigerJ2 GeigerJ2 requested a review from khsrali May 13, 2026 15:06
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v7
with:
name: coverage
name: coverage-${{ matrix.broker-backend }}
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@GeigerJ2
Thanks for taking care of this. quick question:
Why do we need to run coverage multiple times in the first place?
the results should be identical, right? or am i missing something

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants