This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 27, 2022. It is now read-only.
Closed
Conversation
Owner
|
Thanks for your contribution @Metropo! I've slightly updated your changes and added it for next release (source not public available at the moment). |
andi34
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2021
- changes adjusted by Andreas Blaesius - introduced on #181 Change-Id: I7e1b6c99edcd82dbd28cf5e748cf30239643ae5c
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "x" next to an item)
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
The install script is now able to to also install on ubuntu linux systems. Most features already worked, so now it prints a warning, that some pi-specific features are missing and you can continue.
No changes on the fotobooth itself.
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Not really